Rethinking Gender Equity in Education: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on CAMFED’s Individualized Material Support in Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia
Authors
School of Built Environment, Graduate Studies, the Copperbelt University, Kitwe Campus (Zambia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000152
Subject Category: Educational Research
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2115-2130
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-22
Accepted: 2026-07-27
Published: 2026-08-04
Abstract
This study evaluated stakeholders’ perceptions of the impact of CAMFED’s individualized material support on educational outcomes and gender equity in Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia. Guided by Liberal Feminist Theory, Intersectionality Theory, and Social Learning Theory, the study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to examine both the intended benefits and unintended consequences of gender-exclusive resource allocation. Quantitative data were collected from a stratified sample of 69 educators and learners and analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and Chi-square tests in SPSS. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions involving district education officials, school administrators, teachers, mentors, and parents were analyzed thematically.
The findings revealed broad stakeholder consensus that individualized material support significantly improved girls’ school attendance, retention, and academic focus. However, inferential analysis identified an emerging equity paradox. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-square analyses indicated significant disparities in access to learning materials and perceptions of systemic unfairness, particularly among non-beneficiary boys and classroom teachers. Qualitative evidence further showed that rigid gender-based targeting overlooked intersectional vulnerabilities, including rural household poverty, exposing vulnerable boys to increased risks of poor academic performance and school dropout. The study also found substantial institutional dependence on NGO funding, raising concerns about the sustainability of programme gains beyond donor support. Although attitudes toward girls’ education had improved, perceptions of exclusion among vulnerable boys threatened long-term stakeholder support.
The study concludes that individualized material support enhances educational participation and retention among vulnerable girls but that sustainable gender equity requires more inclusive, intersectional approaches that address the needs of all vulnerable learners. It recommends adopting an Intersectional Vulnerability Assessment Tool (IVAT) to guide need-based beneficiary selection and strengthening the institutional capacity of the District Education Board Secretary (DEBS) office to institutionalize sustainability mechanisms beyond external donor funding.
Keywords
Gender equity, Targeted support, Intersectionality, Inclusive education, Equity paradox
Downloads
References
1. REFERENCES [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.191–215. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chipungu, S. N. (1992). Guardians in Their Times: Experiences of Zambian Under Colonial Rule, 1890-1964. London: Macmillan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex. . University of Chicago Legal Forum,, 139–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). . Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Evans, D. M. (2024). Girls'Education at Scale. The World Bank Research Observer, 39(1), 47-74. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/Ika002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fund., U. N. (2024). The State of the World's Children 2024: The future of childhood in a changing world. UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Gordon, R. M. (2019). 12 years of quality education for all girls: A Commonwealth perspective. . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2542579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jha, J. K. (2006). Boys' underachievement in education: An exploration in selected Commonwealth countries. Commonwealth Secretariat & Commonwealth of Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Sandoy, I. F. (2024). ffectiveness of Economic support, comprehensive Sexuality Education and Community Dialogue on Early Childbearing and Sitting for Grade Nine Exams Among Adolescent Girls in rural Zambia: A Clusterd randomised trial. eClinicalMedicine,, 78-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report: Inclusion and Education – All Means All. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. UNESCO(A). (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/25: Leadership in education. UNESCO Publishing. . Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/gem-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. UNESCO(B). (2022). Gender report: Deepening the debate on those still left behind. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. UNESCO. (2022a). Leave no child behind: Global report on boys' disengagement from education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. United Nations Children's Fund. (2024). The state of the world's children 2024. UNICEF. Retrieved September 20, 2025, from https://www.unicef.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Unterhalter, E. (2017). Negative capability? Measuring gender equality in education. Comparative Education, 53(1), 24-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Watkins, T. (2010). The Great Depression: America in the 1930s. . New Jersey: Back Bay Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. World Health Organisation (WHO), a. U. (2024). Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in schools 2015–2023: Special focus on menstrual health. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. Retrieved September 20, 2025, from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240097490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Effectiveness of Localized Context-Based STEM Education Approach on Teaching Science 6
- Effectiveness of Contingency Management and Systematic Desensitisation as Behaviour Modification Techniques in Reducing Food Consumption Among Obese Students in South West Nigeria
- Senior High School Background and Learning Practices as Predictors of First-Year Academic Performance in Board Examination-Related Mathematics Subjects among Civil Engineering Students