Trade Union Pluralism, Institutional Coordination and Collective Bargaining: Evidence from Zambia's Public Sector
Authors
Mulungushi University (Zambia)
Mulungushi University (Zambia)
Mulungushi University (Zambia)
London School of Commerce (United Kingdom)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700451
Subject Category: Public Administration
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 6608-6621
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-16
Accepted: 2026-07-21
Published: 2026-08-04
Abstract
The liberalisation of trade union registration has expanded freedom of association in many developing countries, yet its implications for collective bargaining and worker representation remain contested. This study investigates the factors driving trade union proliferation in Zambia's public sector and examines their implications for industrial relations. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining survey data from public sector employees (n=68), with semi-structured interviews involving trade union leaders, employers, and labour administrators (n=18). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses were subjected to thematic analysis to triangulate the findings.
It was found that the liberalisation of union registration following the 1997 Industrial and Labour Relations reforms was perceived as the principal driver of union proliferation. However, leadership disputes, personal ambitions, governance deficits, and dissatisfaction with existing representation also emerged as significant contributory factors. The pre-1997 one-union-one-industry model was perceived as having provided stronger collective bargaining, more coherent worker representation, and more effective dispute resolution than the current pluralist framework. The findings further suggest that union proliferation reflects the interaction of legal reform and organisational governance rather than legislative liberalisation alone.
The study contributes to industrial relations theory by proposing the Contributory Institutional Coordination Framework. The emergent framework identifies institutional coordination as the mechanism through which legal reform shapes the relationship between freedom of association and collective bargaining effectiveness. This presents a departure from the assumption that increased organisational choice necessarily strengthens worker representation. Rather, the findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of union pluralism depends on institutional arrangements capable of coordinating representation. Conclusively, labour law reforms should balance constitutional guarantees of freedom of association with governance mechanisms. This helps to sustain coherent and effective systems of collective bargaining.
Keywords
Collective Bargaining, Governance, Institutional, Pluralism, Trade Union, Zambia
Downloads
References
1. Allen, C.H., 2023. Union-Party Relationships in Francophone West Africa: A Critique of ‘Teleguidage’Interpretations. In The Development of an African Working Class (pp. 99-125). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ayentimi, D.T., Amankwaa, A. and Burgess, J., 2025. A Decade of Industrial Relations Research in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Industrial Relations Journal, 56(5), pp.363-381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bean, R., 2021. Comparative industrial relations: An introduction to cross-national perspectives. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bhuller, M., Moene, K.O., Mogstad, M. and Vestad, O.L., 2022. Facts and fantasies about wage setting and collective bargaining. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(4), pp.29-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Callaci, B., 2023. Labor Unions and the Problem of Monopoly: Collective Bargaining and Market Governance, 1890 to the Present. Politics & Society, 51(3), pp.387-408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cohen, R., 2024. Labour and politics in Nigeria. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Doellgast, V. and Wagner, I., 2022. Collective regulation and the future of work in the digital economy: Insights from comparative employment relations. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(3), pp.438-460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dorfman, A. and Harel, A., 2023. The Necessity of Institutional Pluralism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 43(4), pp.753-776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hafiz, H., 2025. Toward a progressive labor antitrust. Columbia Law Review, 125(2), pp.319-412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hamann, S., 2020. The global food system, agro-industrialization and governance: alternative conceptions for sub-Saharan Africa. Globalizations, 17(8), pp.1405-1420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hepburn, S., 2019. Service and solidarity: domestic workers, informal organising and the limits of unionisation in Zambia. Journal of Southern African Studies, 45(1), pp.31-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hertel-Fernandez, A., Kimball, W. and Kochan, T., 2022. What forms of representation do American workers want? Implications for theory, policy, and practice. ILR Review, 75(2), pp.267-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Horwitz, F.M. and Cooke, F.L., 2021. Labor-management relations in emerging economies and developing countries. In Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics (pp. 1-35). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hyman, R. and Gumbrell-McCormick, R., 2020. Collective representation at work: Institutions and dynamics. In Comparative employment relations in the global economy (pp. 215-238). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Jaeck, M., Marais, M., Joly, C. and Preuss, L., 2024. Navigating the moral-economic paradox of diversity management: plurality of stakeholder perceptions and coping strategies. Group & Organization Management, 49(6), pp.1495-1535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Jäger, S., Noy, S. and Schoefer, B., 2022. The German model of industrial relations: Balancing flexibility and collective action. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(4), pp.53-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kaufman, B.E., Barry, M., Wilkinson, A., Lomas, G. and Gomez, R., 2021. Using unitarist, pluralist, and radical frames to map the cross-section distribution of employment relations across workplaces: A four-country empirical investigation of patterns and determinants. Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(2), pp.204-234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kratou, H. and Laakso, L., 2022. The impact of academic freedom on democracy in Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 58(4), pp.809-826. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lambert, R. and Webster, E., 2024. The re-emergence of political unionism in contemporary South Africa?. In Popular Struggles in South Africa (pp. 20-41). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Landau, I., Howe, J., Thi Kieu Tran, T., Mahy, P. and Sutherland, C., 2023. Regulatory pluralism and the resolution of collective labour disputes in Southeast Asia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 65(4), pp.472-496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Libebe, E.L. and Warikandwa, T.V., 2022. The agency problem in trade unions: A case for enforcing trade union leadership accountability in Namibia’s labour laws. Obiter, 43(2), pp.375-393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Madimutsa, C., 2023. Industrial relations, social dialogue and pacification of public sector unions in Zambia: Rethinking trade union strategies. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 58(8), pp.1528-1544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Madimutsa, C. and Pretorius, L.G., 2021. Public sector reform and the challenges of open and expansive unionism in Zambia. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(4), pp.707-720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Marino, S. and Lucio, M.M., 2024. Power resource theories and the case of trade unions and migrant labour in increasingly fragmented labour markets. In Workers, Power and Society (pp. 202-221). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. McNamara, T., 2021. The union has reoriented towards entrepreneurship: neoliberal solidarities on Zambia’s Copperbelt. Third World Quarterly, 42(9), pp.2152-2171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Meardi, G., 2024. Capitalist crises and industrial relations theorizing. In The Value of Industrial Relations (pp. 26-36). Bristol University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Meardi, G., 2025. The role of trade unions. Handbook of Comparative Political Economy, pp.201-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mikander, P. and Satokangas, H., 2024. Addressing democracy and its threats in education: Exploring a pluralist perspective in light of Finnish social studies textbooks. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 43(5), pp.555-571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Musić, G. and Harisch, I.R., 2026. Industrial Participatory Democracy: A ‘Paper Tiger’of the Zambian One-Party State and Its Transnational Entanglements. In Visions and Practices of Democracy in Socialist and Post-Colonial States (pp. 351-378). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Nyarko, S., Atinga, R.A. and Mahama, J.C., 2026. Pain, policy, and the opioid dilemma in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of access, regulation, and health governance from 1990 to 2024. Health Policy and Planning, 41(5), pp.898-912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Öker, İ., Kına, M.F. and Kuran, İ., 2026. Belonging to unions across the world: Macro and micro dynamics. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(2), pp.159-186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Prouska, R., Nyfoudi, M., Psychogios, A., Szamosi, L.T. and Wilkinson, A., 2023. Solidarity in action at a time of crisis: The role of employee voice in relation to communication and horizontal solidarity behaviour. British Journal of Management, 34(1), pp.91-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Rulashe, T. and Jam, A., 2025. The Impact Of Labour Union Fragmentation On Service Delivery In The South African Public Sector. Journal Of Governance And Administrative Reform, 6(1), pp.160-193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Sanz de Miguel, P., Welz, C., Caprile, M. and Rodríguez Contreras, R., 2020. Industrial democracy in Europe: a quantitative approach. Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 30(2), pp.101-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Spiggle, S., 1994. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, pp.491-503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Webster, E., 2022. The rise of social-movement unionism: the two faces of the black trade union movement in South Africa. In State, resistance and change in South Africa (pp. 174-196). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
- Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
- Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
- Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
- The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark