A Navigating Midlife with Purpose: Quality of Life Experiences among Consecrated Women Religious in Kenya

Authors

Lucia Mwikali. K. Mutuku

Department of Counseling Psychology, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa (Kenya)

Dr. Sr. Sabina Mutisya

Department of Counseling Psychology, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa (Kenya)

Dr. Maria Ntarangwe

Department of Counseling Psychology, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700487

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 7153-7164

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-18

Accepted: 2026-07-24

Published: 2026-08-05

Abstract

Background: Quality of life is a multidimensional concept that reflects individuals’ perceptions of their physical health, psychological well-being, social relationships, and environmental conditions. Among middle-aged Consecrated Women Religious, quality of life may be influenced by the unique demands of religious vocation, including communal living, spiritual commitments, ministry responsibilities, and the developmental transitions associated with midlife. Aim: This study aimed to assess the quality of life among middle-aged Consecrated Women Religious in the Western Deanery of the Archdiocese of Nairobi, Kenya. Methods: The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional research design. A sample of 220 middle-aged Consecrated Women Religious was targeted, with 212 participants completing the questionnaires, resulting in a 96.4% response rate. Data were collected using an adapted Quality of Life instrument based on the World Health Organization Quality of Life framework. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were used to summarize quality of life levels, while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine differences in quality of life based on demographic characteristics. Results: Participants reported relatively positive quality of life across all domains. Psychological health recorded the highest mean score (M = 3.84, SD = 0.46), followed by social relationships (M = 3.71, SD = 0.37), environment (M = 3.58, SD = 0.60), and physical health (M = 3.32, SD = 0.39). The overall quality of life score was high (M = 3.61, SD = 0.34). ANOVA results showed no statistically significant differences in quality of life based on age, education level, congregational role, or years in religious life (p > .05). Conclusion: Middle-aged Consecrated Women Religious demonstrated generally positive quality of life across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. The findings highlight the potential contribution of spiritual commitment, supportive community structures, and meaningful religious engagement to sustaining well-being during midlife.

Keywords

Quality of life; Consecrated Women Religious; midlife; psychological well-being

Downloads

References

1. Anyi, M., Amissah, T., Wambua, J., & Muasa, W. (2023). Relationship between emotional intelligence and social well-being among members of the Congregation of the Daughters of the Holy Spirit in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Joiner, R. J., Martinez, B. S., Nelson, N. A., & Bergeman, C. S. (2022). Within-person changes in religiosity, control beliefs, and subjective well-being across middle and late adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 37(7), 848–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jung, C. G. (1968). The portable Jung (J. Campbell, Ed.). Viking Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kelsey, M. T. (2021). Spirituality and the integration of the self: Counseling and personal growth. Paulines Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kersteins, K., & Muasa, P. (2023). Pastoral burnout and meaning in life among Catholic religious men and women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Koenig, H. G. (2020). Maintaining health and well-being by putting faith into action during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health, 59, 2205–2214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01035-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Korpela, K., et al. (2026). [Study on musculoskeletal pain, insomnia, and health-related quality of life among middle-aged adults]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kweyu, E., et al. (2023). Positive living and social support among perpetually professed Consecrated Women Religious in the Archdiocese of Nairobi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lachman, M. E. (2015). Mind the gap in the middle: A call to study midlife. Research in Human Development, 12(3–4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2015.1068048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lodi-Smith, J., Ponterio, E. J., Newton, N. J., Poulin, M. J., Baranski, E., & Whitbourne, S. K. (2021). The codevelopment of generativity and well-being into early late life. Psychology and Aging, 36(3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Makunda, J., Waititu, H., & Nyakundi, C. (2024). Unveiling longitudinal patterns in international mental health assessments: A systematic evaluation of clustering techniques. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(9), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.809048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malamud, W. (1923). Review of the book Psychological types, or the psychology of individuation, by C. G. Jung]. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 18(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mariko Hirose, M., & John W. Creswell, J. W. (2022). Applying core quality criteria of mixed methods research to an empirical study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221086346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Martha Hennink, Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221147245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McManus, M. (2020). Ageing among Catholic sisters: Spirituality, meaning, and adaptation in later life. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mutuku, J., et al. (2021). Emotional intelligence and adjustment to community living among Consecrated Women Religious in Nairobi, Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., & Jones, J. W. (2021). APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality. American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rakhshani, T., et al. (2024). Quality of life, marital satisfaction, stress, and anxiety among married women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sidhi & Dwivedi, R. (2022). Correlation Between Marital Adjustment and Quality of Life on Middle Age Women in Haryana. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 10(3), 571-577. DIP:18.01.057.20221003, DOI:10.25215/1003.057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Snowdon, D. A. (2001). Aging with grace: What the Nun Study teaches us about leading longer, healthier, and more meaningful lives. Bantam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Teodorczyk, M., et al. (2024). Health awareness and health-seeking attitudes among consecrated women religious. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tumaini, W. (2020). Severity of Depression and Its Association with Spiritual Coping among Consecrated Religious in the Catholic Diocese of Mtwara, Tanzania. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.24940/THEIJHSS/2020/V8/I2/HS2002-081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Health Organization. (2020). Decade of healthy ageing: Baseline report. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles