Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Grassroots Involvement in Forest Resource Management at Kalinzu Central Forest Reserve

Authors

Mudini Albert

Forest Officer Ministry of Water and Environment (Uganda)

Agaba Albert

Qualitative Researcher Mbarara University of Science and Technology (Uganda)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700597

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 8699-8718

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-25

Accepted: 2026-07-30

Published: 2026-08-08

Abstract

Grassroots involvement in forest resource management is widely recognised as essential for ensuring sustainability, accountability, and equitable benefit sharing. This study focused on Kalinzu Central Forest Reserve (KCFR) in Uganda. The main aim of this paper is to uncover the perceived benefits and challenges of grassroots involvement in forest resource management at KCFR. The research adopted a qualitative cross-sectional case study design guided by narrative inquiry. Data was collected from 27 respondents, including community members, leaders, and National Forestry Authority (NFA) officials. The study revealed the main benefits as alternative livelihoods (beekeeping and ecotourism), strengthened community ownership (Mindset change), enhanced biodiversity conservation, and greater social equity yet significantly constrained by challenges such as unequal access to benefits, weak institutional support, communication gaps, poverty-driven resource pressure, human-wildlife conflicts, and bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Keywords

Grassroots, Forest Resources, Forest Resource Management, Collaborative Forest Resource Management, Central Forest Reserve

Downloads

References

1. Adhikari, B., et al. (2020). Community-based forest management and sustainable development in Asia. Journal of Environmental Management, 254, Article 109856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Armitage, D., et al. (2020). Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(2), Article e160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asamoah, O., et al. (2024). Perception of Locals on Multiple Contributions of NTFPs to the Livelihoods of Forest Fringe Communities in Ghana. Forests, 15(5), 861. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Begum, N., & Alam, S. (2023). An assessment of the legal and policy framework for participatory forest governance in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 26(1), 33–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blomley, T., & Namara, A. (2020). Collaborative forest management in Uganda: Achievements and challenges. National Forestry Authority. https://www.nfa.go.ug/images/A_REVIEW_OF_COLLABORATIVE_FOREST_MANAGEMENT_IN_UGANDA.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brondízio, E. S., et al. (2021). Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 481–509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chabala, C. (2004). Forest management in Zambia: A focus on women’s access to forest resources. Master’s thesis, Southern African Regional Centre for Women’s Law. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Devkota, K. D. (2019). Performance of community forestry governance: Three case studies from western Nepal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Duguma, L. A., et al. (2018). Community forestry frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact on sustainable development. Ecology and Society, 23(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Essougong, U. P. K., et al. (2019). Addressing equity in community forestry. Ecology and Society, 24(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Farrell, E. P., et al. (2000). European forest ecosystems: Building the future on the legacy of the past. Forest Ecology and Management, 132(1), 5–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2020). Global forest resources assessment 2020: Main report. FAO. https://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/en/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Haji, L., Valizadeh, N., & Hayati, D. (2020). The role of local communities in sustainable land and forest management. In Spatial modeling in forest resources management (pp. 473–503). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Haq, S. M., et al. (2023). Integrating traditional ecological knowledge into habitat restoration. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 19(1), 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Holmes, G. D. (1975). History of forestry and forest management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 271(911), 69–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kazoora, C., et al. (2020). Involving local communities in protecting the Kalinzu Central Forest Reserve. WWF baseline report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kigenyi, F. W. (2008). Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements. CBNRM proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kusters, K., et al. (2022). Formalizing community forest tenure rights: A theory of change and conditions for success. Forest Policy and Economics, 141, Article 102766. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mawa, C., Babweteera, F., & Tumusiime, D. M. (2022). Livelihood outcomes after two decades of co-managing a state forest in Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics, 135, Article 102644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mawa, C., Tumusiime, D. M., Babweteera, F., Okwir, E., & Tabuti, J. R. S. (2023). Community-based forest management promotes survival-led livelihood diversification among forest-fringe communities in Uganda. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, Article 1125247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Melubo, K. (2023). Indigenous tourism in Africa. In Cultural heritage and tourism in Africa (pp. 46–66). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mgaya, E. (2020). Traditional institutions’ management of sacred forests in Tanzania. PhD thesis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nandigama, S. (2020). Performance of success and failure in grassroots conservation and development interventions: Gender dynamics in participatory forest management in India. Land Use Policy, 97, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.103445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. National Forestry Authority. (2019). State of Uganda’s forests report. Kampala: NFA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. National Forestry and Tree Planting (Amended)Act, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nsita, S. A., et al. (2017). Forest tenure reform implementation in Uganda: Current challenges and future opportunities (Occasional Paper No. 196). CIFOR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ogwu, M. C., et al. (2023). Indigenous knowledge systems in African forest conservation. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rasmussen, L. V. (2023). Local knowledge integration in sustainable forest management. Ecological Economics, 204, Article 107638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Senecah, S. L. (2024). The Trinity of Voice: A framework to improve trust and ground decision making in participatory processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(9), 2091–2115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Somorin, O. A. (2010). Climate impacts, forest-dependent rural livelihoods and adaptation strategies in Africa: A review. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(13), 903–912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Torres, H., et al. (2020). Information flow and community participation in natural resource management. Environmental Communication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. van Woerkom, L. (n.d.). Towards bridging the gap between theory and practice: The micro-politics of community-based natural resource management in South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Vise, R. S. (2019). An analysis of the impacts extractive industries have on African ape conservation and community development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wasonga, V. O., Kambewa, D., & Bekalo, I. (2010). Community-based natural resource management. In Managing natural resources for development in Africa (pp. 165–210). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wily, L. A. (2000). Forest tenure and community-based management in Africa. IIED. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles