Exploring the Integration of ChatGPT for Teaching English in a Malaysian Primary School

This research investigates the integration of ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool, into English language teaching in Malaysian primary schools. The main objective is to explore how teachers perceive ChatGPT in terms of its usefulness, impact on teaching effectiveness, and influence on pupil engagement. The study also aims to identify the benefits, challenges, and concerns teachers face when using AI tools in the classroom. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with 10 English teachers from different primary schools. The participants shared their experiences with using AI, particularly ChatGPT, in their teaching practices. Data were analysed to identify common themes related to perceptions, implementation, and practical challenges. The findings reveal that teachers generally view ChatGPT as a helpful tool for lesson planning, generating creative teaching materials, and supporting differentiated instruction. Many teachers believe that AI can enhance classroom interaction and motivate pupils through engaging and personalized learning activities. However, several challenges were identified, including insufficient access to technology, limited digital infrastructure, lack of teacher training, and uncertainty about AI’s role in relation to traditional face-to-face instruction. Teachers also expressed concerns about over-reliance on AI and the need to maintain human elements in teaching. The study concludes that while educators are open to adopting AI tools like ChatGPT, effective integration requires proper training, policy guidance, and cultural relevance. It recommends ongoing professional development, collaboration between AI tools and conventional methods, and the development of clear guidelines for classroom use. Future research could explore the long-term impact of AI on learning outcomes, evaluate different AI tools for language teaching, and examine AI’s potential in promoting inclusive education.

ChatGPT, English Language Teaching, Malaysian Primary Schools

1. Abdul, A., & Puspaningrum, L. (2024). Adapting AI tools for local educational practices: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Educational Technology and Pedagogy, 39(1), 78–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chin, C., Lee, H., & Tan, S. (2023). Leveraging AI for personalized learning in primary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 101–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language’. British Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Harbin Engineering Journal. (2023). The importance of English education in global communication, 12(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Heng, L., & Tan, K. (2021). Challenges in teaching English in Malaysian primary schools: A review of recent studies. Journal of Language Teaching, 45(3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Holmes, B., Greer, J., & Hearn, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and challenges. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Holmes, B., Holscher, T., & Sutherland, P. (2023). The practical integration of AI in education: Experiences from the classroom. Educational Technology Research Journal, 38(2), 12–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hu, Z. (2023). ChatGPT: The future of education? Tech Review, 15(3), 28–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jones, D., & MacDonald, A. (2022). Teacher agency in the digital age: Adapting AI to maintain engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 35–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jones, H. (2021). AI in language education: Enhancing learning outcomes with ChatGPT. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 118–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Koh, S., Lee, C., & Wong, M. (2024). The limitations of AI in education: A case study of ChatGPT in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 359–374.* https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10092-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, J., & Tan, L. (2024). ChatGPT in education: Prospects and challenges. Educational Review, 46(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lim, L., & Chan, K. (2023). Re-thinking AI integration in education: Beyond efficiency. Journal of Education and Technology, 52(3), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lin, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Balancing efficiency and creativity in AI-assisted lesson planning. Journal of Language Teaching and Technology, 15(4), 255–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. McCallum, S. (2023). Global restrictions on ChatGPT: Educational implications. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 102–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Melor Md Yunus, J. (2022). AI and personalized learning in diverse classrooms. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Melor Md Yunus, J. (2023). AI in education: Integrating ChatGPT into Malaysian classrooms. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 16(2), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mustafa, A., Tan, Y., & Nordin, R. (2024). Impact of AI on social skills and human interaction in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ng, P., Lim, C., & Tan, Y. (2023). Critical thinking and creativity in English education in Malaysia: The role of technology. Journal of Malaysian Education, 40(4), 109–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ng, J., Tan, S., & Sim, H. (2022). The personal touch in teaching: The role of human interaction in AI-assisted language learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102(1), 104–115.* https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.10316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nguyen, L., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Technology integration in primary education: The role of AI tools like ChatGPT. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(2), 88–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive overview of capabilities and use cases. OpenAI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education: The SAMR model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 103–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tan, C., & Tan, Y. (2023). Teacher readiness in incorporating AI tools in primary schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Pedagogy, 34(2), 52–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wilson, D., & Grossman, D. (2023). The impact of real-time feedback on language learners using AI tools. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 89–105.* https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221114143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yau, Y., & Chan, T. (2023). Ethical considerations in AI adoption in education. International Journal of Educational Ethics, 12(1), 19–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yunus, M. M., Hashim, H., & Ali, S. (2023). Teacher innovation in digital teaching materials: The role of artificial intelligence. Journal of Digital Education, 10(1), 50–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yunus, M. M., Nordin, M., & Tan, K. (2023). Evaluating ChatGPT in the context of Malaysian primary education: Challenges and opportunities. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 21–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zaveria, S. (2023). AI in education: The ethical and security concerns. Journal of Education Technology Policy, 29(4), 91–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zhang, S., Sun, L., & Li, Y. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT in teaching English language skills. International Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zhang, Y., & Lee, C. (2022). Using AI tools to generate educational content: A review of challenges. Journal of Educational Research, 91(3), 214–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study