Beyond Agency Theory: A Configurational Theory of Corporate Governance Effectiveness in an Emerging Economy

This study develops and tests a configurational theory of corporate governance effectiveness that moves beyond the limitations of agency theory in explaining governance outcomes in emerging economies. Drawing on a sample of 98 companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group, the study employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the combinations of board characteristics, ownership structures, audit functions, and institutional pressures that are sufficient for achieving high governance effectiveness. The analysis reveals three distinct configurational pathways---termed institutional substitution, board-centric, and hybrid alignment---each representing a qualitatively different logic of governance effectiveness. These findings provide strong empirical support for the principle of equifinality, demonstrating that multiple, distinct governance arrangements can be equally effective in an emerging economy characterised by institutional voids, concentrated ownership, and weak enforcement. The study integrates agency theory, institutional theory, and configurational theory to offer a nuanced understanding of how governance effectiveness emerges from the alignment of internal mechanisms with external institutional pressures. The results challenge the universalist assumptions underlying many governance codes and suggest that regulatory strategies in emerging economies should move away from prescriptive, one-size-fits-all approaches toward principles-based frameworks that enable firms to develop context-appropriate governance configurations. The findings carry significant implications for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars seeking to understand and improve corporate governance in contexts where formal mechanisms often fail to operate as intended.

corporate governance; configurational theory; equifinality; emerging economies

1. Abdulazeez, I. A., Uadiale, O. M., & Ozili, P. K. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1257--1263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adegbite, E., Amoah, J., Kwabi, F., & Tsaliki, P. (2022). Transfer of corporate governance practices into weak emerging market environments by foreign institutional investors. International Business Review, 31(5), Article 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475--492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. (2012). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 315--331. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alsmady, A. A. (2024). Family ownership, corporate governance quality and tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging market---The case of Jordan. Risks, 12(2), Article 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12020086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bala, A. (2025). Corporate governance and bank performance in Nigeria: Insights from emerging economy dynamics. EIRA Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 1(1), 23--30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147--160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fainshmidt, S., & Boivie, S. (2020). Equifinality in corporate governance: A configurational approach. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 312--328. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393--420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries through an institutional lens. In A. Crane, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (2nd ed., pp. 1--28). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305--360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471--517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Marx, A., & Rihoux, B. (2013). The potential of comparative methods and fsQCA. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 139--141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.767996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nguimkeu, P., & Tcheuko, M. (2024). Internationalisation of African firms from an institutional investor perspective. In African Business and Sustainable Development. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Onyenucheya, A. (2023, October 13). '23.8m family businesses contribute $200b to Nigeria's economy yearly'. The Guardian Nigeria. https://guardian.ng/business-services/23-8m-family-businesses-contribute-200b-to-nigerias-economy-yearly/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ososuakpor, J. (2022). Corporate governance and organizational performance: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i8/15087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Otika, M. U., Iheriohanma, E. B. J., & Nwokorie, E. C. (2019). Inheritance culture and management succession of family-owned businesses in Nigeria: An empirical study. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(2), 156--171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ozili, P. K., & Uadiale, O. M. (2017). Ownership concentration and bank profitability. Future Business Journal, 3(2), 159--171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013). Looking like a state: Techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation. Journal of Development Studies, 49(1), 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.709614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ragin, C. C., & Davey, S. (2017). fs/QCA [Computer Programme], Version 3.0. Irvine, CA: University of California. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sanda, A., Mikailu, A. S., & Garba, T. (2010). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria. African Economic Research Consortium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schiehll, E., Ahmadjian, C., & Filatotchev, I. (2014). National governance bundles perspective: Understanding the diversity of corporate governance practices at the firm and country levels. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(6), 475--491. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Securities and Exchange Commission Nigeria. (2020). SEC corporate governance guideline and revised FORM 01. https://sec.gov.ng/for-investors/keep-track-of-circulars/sec-corporate-governance-guideline-and-revised-form-01/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Setiawati, E., Putri, E., & Nisa, N. (2022). Implementation of corporate governance, family ownership, and firm value. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 22--35. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(4).2022.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Uwuigbe, U., & Fakile, A. S. (2012). The effects of board size and board composition on the corporate social and environmental disclosure of listed companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(3), 310--316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Uwuigbe, U., Olowe, S., & Olusola, J. (2018). Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Nigerian listed companies. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 195--212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-06-2017-0062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Bank. (2019). Corporate governance country assessment: Pakistan. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/173791553607925909/pdf/Corporate-Governance-Country-Assessment-Pakistan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar