Personality Traits, Emotional Intelligence, Organizational Culture, and Work Performance of Personnel: Basis for Intervention
Authors
Philippine National Police, Police Regional Office - Negros Island Region (Philippines)
La Carlota City College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700820
Subject Category: Human Resource Management
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 12201-12217
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-01
Accepted: 2026-08-08
Published: 2026-08-13
Abstract
This study determined the levels of personality traits, emotional intelligence, and organizational culture, and their relationship to the work performance of selected Philippine National Police (PNP) personnel in 2026. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were gathered through standardized survey instruments adopted from the International Personality Item Pool (2023), Schutte et al. (2021), and Cameron et al. (2021). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data obtained with respect to specific research questions. Findings revealed that personnel possessed very high levels of personality traits, emotional intelligence, and organizational culture. Work performance was determined to be very satisfactory based on recent Individual Performance Evaluation Ratings (IPER). However, correlation analyses demonstrated no significant relationship between work performance and personality traits, emotional intelligence, or organizational culture. The findings imply that personnel metrics may reflect standardized compliance or evaluator leniency rather than individual behavioral variances. Overall, the study highlights the necessity of refining evaluation protocols and establishing a basis for targeted policy improvements and organizational interventions.
Keywords
Personality Traits; Emotional Intelligence; Organizational Culture; Work Performance; Philippine National Police
Downloads
References
1. Alama, R. T. (2021). Institutional conformity and gender identity disclosures in highly structured paramilitary bureaucracies. Journal of Public Safety Dynamics, 14(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alsabahi, M. A., Ku Bahador, K. M., & Saat, R. M. (2021). The influence of personal characteristics and workplace learning on information technology competency among external auditors: The role of organisational culture as a moderator. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), Article 1899625. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1899625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Andersen, J. P., & Gustafsberg, H. (2022). A training method to improve police use of force decision-making: A randomized controlled trial. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2022). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 148(5–6), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2022). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 148(5–6), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aquino, M. S. (2022). The impact of professionalization laws on the educational baselines and field performance of law enforcement officers. Philippine Review of Criminology and Public Safety, 8(1), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Baldwin, C. S., Di Nota, P. M., & Huhta, J. M. (2025). Physiological stress differentially impacts cognitive performance during—and memory following—simulated police encounters with persons experiencing a mental health crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1549752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1549752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bautista, L. C., Mercado, F. J., & Santos, P. M. (2023). Gender mainstreaming in protective services: Breaking down barriers to recruitment and retention of female officers. Asian Journal of Policing Studies, 19(3), 201–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bol, J. C., & Moers, F. (2024). Subjective performance evaluation inflation and compression: Implications for personnel contracts and organizational productivity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 112, Article 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2024.101512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for performance-score accuracy: Addressing managerial leniency bias and poor rating calibration in talent analytics. Human Resource Management Review, 26(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Castor, E. V. (2022). Career stabilization curves and early-career attrition within high-stress public safety sectors. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 24(4), 341–355. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chalfin, A. (2025). Investments in policing and community safety. Annual Review of Criminology, 8(1), 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-111523-122746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Côté, S. (2022). Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2021). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(4), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Demou, E., MacLean, A., Cheripelli, B., Hunt, K., & Gray, C. M. (2022). Occupational differences in health behaviours and well-being among working-age adults. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13466-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Di Fabio, A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2021). The relationship of emotional intelligence and self-awareness with workplace well-being and performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Giles, H., Linz, D., Bonilla, D., & Gomez, M. L. (2024). Bridging training and practice: Communication challenges and sustainable organizational behavior in policing. Sustainability, 17(22), Article 9938. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Golman, R., & Bhatia, S. (2021). Subjective performance evaluation inflation and compression: A behavioral account of managerial rating distortions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 91, Article 101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gomez, D. L. (2024). Aging in hazardous occupations: Tracking structural demographic shifts and optional retirement trends in policing. Journal of Gerontological and Occupational Studies, 31(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2021). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 987–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Hesketh, I. (2023). Well-being in policing: Past, present, and future. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 38(3), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-023-09590-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hill, S. L., Giles, H., & Maguire, E. R. (2025). The importance of listening in police-community dialogue: Insights from the hearts and minds initiative. Police Quarterly, 28(2), 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111241258942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ingrams, A., Piotrowski, S. J., & Berliner, D. (2022). Learning from public sector employees: Organizational factors and employee performance in government nstitutions. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kampkötter, P., & Sliwka, D. (2023). Subjective performance evaluations and employee effort: The negative impact of centrality and leniency biases on procedural fairness. Management Science, 69(11), 6821–6839. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2022). Organizational culture, public service motivation, and job performance in public organizations. Public Management Review, 24(6), 875–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1886143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kotsou, I., Mikolajczak, M., Heeren, A., Grégoire, J., & Leys, C. (2023). Improving emotional regulation and resilience through emotional intelligence interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1138279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1138279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Lee, Y., Woo, B., & Kim, J. (2021). The indirect effects of organizational culture on employee performance through job satisfaction and engagement. Sustainability, 13(11), 6123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ligtas, L. M. C. (2026). The role of police visibility and community engagement towards peace and order situation as perceived by community. American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 9(3), 25–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Love, S. (2023). What drives road rage? A systematic review on the psychological correlates of aggressive driving behavior. USC Research Bank, 14(2), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Magny, O., & Todak, N. (2021). Emotional intelligence in policing: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal, 44(6), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-01-2021-0008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Manubag, A. A. A., & Revisa, W. A. (2025). The collaborative force: Lessons from police community relations in crime solution. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 6902–6917. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mattingly, V., & Kraiger, K. (2022). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. McCraty, R., & Atkinson, M. (2021). Resilience training program reduces physiological and psychological stress in high-risk occupations. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21649561211024380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. McCraty, R., & Atkinson, M. (2021). Resilience training program reduces physiological and psychological stress in high-risk occupations. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21649561211024380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Mendoza, J. R. (2023). The intermediate backbone: Evaluating the operational value of law enforcement officers in the six-to-ten-year career phase. Contemporary Law Enforcement Quarterly, 40(2), 154–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Mercado, C. R. (2024). Stress & self-regulation in law enforcement (Publication No. 546) [Master's thesis, DePaul University]. Digital Commons@DePaul. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Moon, S. H. (2021). Effects of supervisory feedback on job satisfaction and organizational commitment among law enforcement officers. Policing: An International Journal, 44(4), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-01-2021-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Ngo, Q., Thompson, R. E., & Wright, L. C. (2024). Team cohesion as a structural moderator of chronic operational exhaustion in public safety organizations. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 114528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.114528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Oh, H. K., & Jang, C. Y. (2023). Institutional support mechanisms and the mitigation of post-traumatic stress among South Korean police officers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2022). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Paais, M., & Pattiruhu, J. R. (2021). Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on employee satisfaction and performance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Reyes, H. B., & Torres, G. N. (2021). The organizational pyramid: Balancing field-level non-commissioned officers with community safety demands. Journal of Administrative and Bureaucratic Studies, 15(3), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Ribeiro, N., Yücel, İ., & Gomes, D. (2021). How organizational culture influences employee performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction and commitment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Salas, E. (2021). Teamwork in high-risk environments: Shared mental models and tactical efficiency. Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128220002/teamwork-in-high-risk-environments [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Salmon, P. M., King, B., Hall, D., McLean, S., Thompson, J., Cooke, N., Salas, E., Loft, S., & Read, G. J. M. (2026). The big five model of teamwork and human autonomy teams: A scoping review. Applied Ergonomics, 135, Article 104761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Sánchez-Álvarez, N., Berrios Martos, M. P., & Extremera, N. (2022). Emotional intelligence and work engagement: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 840955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Santos, A. M., & Dela Cruz, J. E. (2022). Age distribution and field resilience: Optimizing physical vitality and experience in active police units. Southeast Asian Journal of Law Enforcement, 10(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Soto, C. J. (2021). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 32(5), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621989191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Tannenbaum, S., & Salas, E. (2025). Teams that work: The seven drivers of team effectiveness. Sprowls Educational Foundation. https://www.worklearning.com /2025/05/22/book-teams-that-work-by-scott-tannenbaum-and-eduardo-salas/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Telep, C. W., Weisburd, D., Dau, N., & Braga, A. A. (2021). The evidence regarding police education and police performance. Policing: An International Journal, 44(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2020-0184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Todak, N., Huff, J., & James, L. (2021). Stress, gender, and police work: Examining occupational experiences among law enforcement officers. Police Quarterly, 24(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211009092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Valdez, C. P. (2025). Strict quotas and streamlined commands: An evaluation of administrative structural caps in regional law enforcement agencies. Global Bureaucracy Review, 22(1), 13–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Villanueva, K. G., & Dimaculangan, R. S. (2024). Post-graduate legal pursuits among active duty public safety personnel: Navigating institutional barriers and shift constraints. Journal of Higher Education and Professional Development, 18(2), 210–226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Wolfe, S. E., & Nix, J. (2022). Understanding police organizational dynamics and officer perceptions in contemporary policing. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(5), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211064092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Woo, S. E., Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., & Parrigon, S. (2022). Putting the “person” in the future of work: Personality traits and adaptability in changing workplaces. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 134, 103691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Zakaria, N. Z., Osman, I., & Noranee, S. (2023). Personality traits and job performance of police: A systematic literature review. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i3(I).3547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Zhang, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2022). Organizational culture and employee outcomes: A moderated mediation model in public sector organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 845672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
- A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
- Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
- Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
- Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement