Paying for Maternal Health, Punishing Providers: Why Provider Payment Drives, and Performance Monitoring Suppresses, Maternal Health Service Delivery under Cameroon's Health Voucher Programme
Authors
University of Bamenda (Bamenda Northwest Region Cameroon)
University of Bamenda (Bamenda Northwest Region Cameroon)
University of Bamenda (Bamenda Northwest Region Cameroon)
University of Bamenda (Bamenda Northwest Region Cameroon)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700823
Subject Category: Health Science
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 12243-12253
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-25
Accepted: 2026-07-30
Published: 2026-08-13
Abstract
Cameroon's national health voucher programme, launched in 2015 with the support of the French Development Agency and German Financial Cooperation, was extended to the Northwest Region in October 2024 as a demand-side financing mechanism intended to remove financial barriers to maternal healthcare. Although the programme is now operational across 51 accredited facilities, empirical evidence on which of its four core strategic purchasing functions actually move maternal health service delivery remains scarce. This study examines the effect of the core purchasing functions of the health voucher (benefits specification, contracting arrangements, provider payment, and performance monitoring) on maternal health service delivery in selected health facilities in the Northwest Region of Cameroon. A structured questionnaire was administered to 100 healthcare workers (80% female; 69% nurses; 40% with six or more years of experience). Multiple Correspondence Analysis was used to construct continuous indices for each function, and an Ordinary Least Squares regression was estimated, controlling for worker experience. The model is statistically significant overall, F(7, 92) = 4.32, p < 0.001, and the four purchasing functions jointly explain a meaningful share of the variation in service delivery quality (adjusted R² = 0.190). Three findings are striking. First, provider payment exerts the strongest positive effect on maternal health service delivery (β = 0.442, p < 0.001), and yet its implementation strength is the lowest of all four functions (MCA index = 0.065). Second, performance monitoring has a statistically significant negative effect on service delivery (β = -0.217, p = 0.006), an unexpected finding that suggests current monitoring practices generate administrative burden faster than they generate accountability. Third, contract management is well-implemented (MCA index = 0.920) but produces only a weakly significant positive effect (β = 0.219, p = 0.074), and benefits specification has no significant effect at all (β = 0.043, p = 0.401). Together, these findings show that the purchasing function on which the programme depends most for impact is also the one in which it invests least. Three policy implications follow: protect and accelerate provider payment, redesign monitoring as a learning instrument rather than a paperwork instrument, and prioritise reform sequencing over symmetric investment across all four functions. The results contribute one of the first quantitative empirical assessments of strategic purchasing function effects on maternal service delivery in a conflict-affected sub-Saharan setting.
Keywords
Strategic Purchasing, Provider Payment, Performance Monitoring, Maternal Health, Health Voucher, Universal Health Coverage, Fragile Settings, Cameroon
Downloads
References
1. [1] World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. [2] World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. Geneva: WHO Press; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. [3] Ministry of Public Health, Cameroon. National Health Statistics Report. Yaoundé: Government of Cameroon; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. [4] Newbrander W, Waldman R, Shepherd-Banigan M. Rebuilding and strengthening health systems and providing basic health services in fragile states. Disasters. 2011;35(4):639–660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. [5] Kutzin J. Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: concepts and implications for policy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013;91(8):602–611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. [6] Mathauer I, Dale E, Jowett M, Kutzin J. Purchasing Health Services for Universal Health Coverage: How to Make It More Strategic? Health Financing Policy Brief No. 6. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. [7] Hanson K, Brikci N, Erlangga D, Alebachew A, De Allegri M, Balabanova D, et al. The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre. The Lancet Global Health. 2022;10(5):e715–e772. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. [8] Bellows B, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, Warren C, Ezeh A. Increase in facility-based deliveries associated with a maternal health voucher programme in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Health Policy and Planning. 2013;28(2):134–143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. [9] Brody CM, Bellows N, Campbell M, Potts M. The impact of vouchers on the use and quality of health care in developing countries: a systematic review. Global Public Health. 2013;8(4):363–388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. [10] Soeters R, Habineza C, Peerenboom PB. Performance-based financing and changing the district health system: experience from Rwanda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2006;84(11):884–889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. [11] Etiaba E, Onwujekwo O, Honda A, Ibe O, Uzochukwu B, Hanson K. Strategic purchasing for universal health coverage: examining the purchaser-provider relationship within a social health insurance scheme in Nigeria. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(5):e000917. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. [12] Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 1976;3(4):305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. [13] Figueras J, Robinson R, Jakubowski E, editors. Purchasing to Improve Health Systems Performance. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. [14] Meessen B, Soucat A, Sekabaraga C. Performance-based financing: just a donor fad or a catalyst towards comprehensive health-care reform? Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2011;89(2):153–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. [15] Cashin C, Bloom D, Sparkes S, Araujo E, Acharya A, O'Dougherty S. Aligning Public Financial Management and Health Financing: Sustaining the Movement Toward Universal Health Coverage. Health Financing Working Paper No. 17. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. [16] Greenacre M, Blasius J, editors. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. [17] Soucat A, Dale E, Mathauer I, Kutzin J. Pay-for-performance debate: not seeing the forest for the trees. Health Systems & Reform. 2017;3(2):74–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. [18] Bertone MP, Meessen B. Studying the link between institutions and health system performance: a framework and an illustration with the analysis of two performance-based financing schemes in Burundi. Health Policy and Planning. 2013;28(8):847–857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. [19] Witter S, Bertone MP, Chirwa Y, Namakula J, So S, Wurie HR. Evolution of policies on human resources for health: opportunities and constraints in four post-conflict and post-crisis settings. Conflict and Health. 2016;10:31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. [20] Fritsche G, Soeters R, Meessen B. Performance-Based Financing Toolkit. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. [21] Morgan L, Stanton ME, Higgs ES, Balster RL, Bellows NM, Brandes N, Calhoun LM. Financial incentives and maternal health: where is the evidence? Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2018;35(1):1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. [22] Honda A, McIntyre D, Hanson K, Tangcharoensathien V, editors. Strategic Purchasing in China, Indonesia and the Philippines. Comparative Country Studies Vol. 2 No. 1. Geneva: WHO Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. [23] Obare F, Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, Sunday J, Askew I, Bellows B. Community-level impact of the reproductive health vouchers programme on service utilisation in Kenya. Health Policy and Planning. 2013;28(2):165–175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. [24] Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011;(4):CD009094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. [25] Evans DB, Hsu J, Boerma T. Universal health coverage and universal access. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013;91(8):546–546A. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Measuring Waste of Patient Time in Health Care at Non-Digitized Hospital: An Observational Study in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
- Reaffirming Clinical Confidence in Atorvastatin Therapy: A Digital Outreach Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India
- Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Response in a Patient with Hypothyroidism: A Case Report
- Eranda (Ricinus Communis) In Gridhrasi (Sciatica): Classical Rationale, Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence- A Narrative Literature Review
- Magnetotherapy in Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives – A Review