Barriers to Learning Management System Usage in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study in Malaysia

Learning Management Systems (LMS) have become integral to higher education worldwide, yet their effective use is often hindered by various barriers. This mixed-methods study examines the key barriers to LMS usage in a Malaysian higher education context, integrating quantitative survey data with qualitative insights from interviews. The research identifies multiple impediments including limited digital literacy and confidence among users, inadequate training and technical support, infrastructure weaknesses (such as unreliable internet connectivity and insufficient access to devices), and a misalignment of LMS with existing pedagogical practices. Quantitative results indicate that a majority of instructors and students face challenges in these areas, while qualitative findings provide depth, revealing issues like resistance to change and preference for traditional teaching methods. The findings align with broader international literature and underscore that technical adoption alone does not guarantee effective LMS integration. This study highlights the need for comprehensive strategies – from improving user training and institutional support to upgrading infrastructure and encouraging pedagogical innovation – in order to overcome barriers and fully realize the potential of LMS in higher education.

Learning Management System; higher education; barriers; mixed-methods; digital literacy

1. Ahmad, S., Mohd Noor, A. S., Alwan, A. A., Gulzar, Y., Khan, W. Z., & Reegu, F. A. (2023). eLearning acceptance and adoption challenges in higher education. Sustainability, 15(7), 6190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amporful, M. O. (2023). Challenges facing students in using Learning Management System (LMS) in the face of COVID-19 in the Faculty of Business Studies at Takoradi Technical University. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 9(1), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alenezi, A. (2018). Barriers to participation in learning management systems in Saudi Arabian universities. Education Research International, 2018(18):1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5):1-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Donnelly, H. (2016). Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. World Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 48–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mbewe, S. L. (2025, February). Challenges and barriers to learning management systems adoption in higher education: A thematic literature review. Mzuzu University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Multazam, M. N., Korompot, C. A., & Munir, M. (2022). Benefits and difficulties in using Learning Management System (LMS) in paragraph writing class: A lecturer’s and her students’ perception. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education, 1(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Riyath, M. I. M., & Rijah, U. L. M. (2022). Adoption of a learning management system among educators of advanced technological institutes in Sri Lanka. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 17(2), 161–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Radif, M. (2016). A learning management system adoption framework for higher education: The case of Iraq (Doctoral dissertation, Cranfield University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sobhani, S. M. J., Jamshidi, O., & Fozouni Ardekani, Z. (2025). Cultivating knowledge: The adoption experience of learning management systems in agricultural higher education. Frontiers in Education. (Early online publication).10,1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1551546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yacob, N. H. M., Syazwani, N., Fadzillah, M., Hawani, N., Abdul, W., Mustafa, L. M., Jamaluddin, S., Barieyah, A., & Bahari, M. (2020). Learning experience and barriers throughout open distance learning mode: A case study of UiTM Pahang Students. GADING Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 25–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study