When AI Meets Political Satire: Meme Culture, Narrative Contestation and Public Perception in Nigeria's Digital Public Sphere

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed contemporary political communication by expanding the production and circulation of synthetic visual contents, memes, and digitally mediated narratives. While existing scholarship has largely focused on the implications of AI for misinformation, manipulation, and electoral politics, less attention has been devoted to its role in political satire, citizen participation, and narrative contestation, particularly within African digital publics. This study examined the controversy that followed remarks by Nigeria's First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, in June 2026 regarding low-capital enterprises such as akara frying, roasted corn vending, and kuli-kuli production as pathways to economic empowerment. The subsequent circulation of AI-generated Iya Alakara imagery, memes, parody videos, and satirical commentaries transformed the remarks into a significant site of political debate within Nigeria's digital public sphere.
Drawing on Narrative Paradigm Theory, the study employed a qualitative digital ethnographic approach that combined netnography, qualitative content analysis, and visual meme analysis. Data were derived from publicly accessible discussions on X, Facebook, TikTok, Reddit, online news reports, memes, and AI-generated visual contents circulated between June and July 2026. Findings indicated that digital audiences reinterpreted the official entrepreneurship narrative through the lens of lived economic realities, reframing it as a broader discourse on inflation, unemployment, governance, political accountability, and social inequality. The study further demonstrated that AI-generated political imagery functions as a contested symbolic resource rather than a straightforward instrument of persuasion. By appropriating, remixing, and satirizing official narratives, citizens actively participated in the production of alternative political meanings. The paper further argued that the convergence of generative AI, meme culture, and participatory digital media is reshaping political communication in Nigeria by decentralizing narrative authority and expanding opportunities for citizen-led counter-discourse within networked publics.

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Memes, Politics, Digital Satire, Political Communication

1. Abimbade, O., Olayoku, P., & Herro, D. (2022). Millennial activism within Nigerian Twitterscape: From mobilization to social action of #ENDSARS protest. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Paradigm Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chang, H.-C. H., Chen, Y.-C., Shaman, B., Zha, M., Noh, S., Wei, C., Weener, T., & Magee, M. (2026). The meme is the message: Generative memesis and AI visuals in the 2024 USA presidential elections. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 20(1), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v20i1.42647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753–1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dambo, T. H., Ersoy, M., Auwal, A. M., Olorunsola, V. O., Olonode, A., Arikewuyo, A. O., & Joseph, A. (2022). Nigeria's #EndSARS movement and its implication on online protests in Africa's most populous country. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3), e2583. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Daily Trust. (2026, June 27). Mixed reactions trail First Lady's remarks on akara, roasted corn and kuli-kuli businesses. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Daily Trust. (2026, July 5). Tinubu Media Centre under fire over AI-generated image of First Lady selling akara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Diakopoulos, N. (2020). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Elewosi, M., & Zompetti, J. P. (2025). Political themes in memes: An exploration of Ghanaian online memetic discourse. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 14(1), 4–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Elewosi, M., Ofori, M., & Sena Dogbatse, F. (2023). 'We are only to appear to be fighting corruption… We can't even bite': Online memetic anti-corruption discourse in the Ghanaian media. Online Media and Global Communication, 2(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-2007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. University of South Carolina Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Groh, M., Sankaranarayanan, A., Singh, N., Kim, D. Y., Lippman, A., & Picard, R. (2024). Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video. Nature Communications, 15, 7629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Dobber, T. (2024). Distorting the truth versus blatant lies: The effects of different degrees of deception in domestic and foreign political deepfakes. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, 108096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Dobber, T. (2022). You won't believe what they just said! The effects of political deepfakes embedded as vox populi on social media. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221116346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Dobber, T. (2024). They would never say anything like this! Reasons to doubt political deepfakes. European Journal of Communication, 39(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231184703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Idowu, D. L. (2023). Digital activism and social change in Africa: Motivations, outcomes and constraints. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 40(4), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2023.2177627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ibrahim, H., Jang, H. D., Aldahoul, N., Kaufman, A. R., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2026). Systematic partisan content skews in TikTok during the 2024 US elections. Nature, 654, 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10447-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2018). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Johann, M. (2022). Political participation in transition: Internet memes as a form of political expression in social media. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(1), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.01.3005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. John, F. F., & Tomere, D. (2022). Engaging ideology and the performance of actors in the political memes of Nigeria and South Africa. African Journal for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 25(2), 70–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jungherr, A. (2023). Contemporary political communication: New media, new publics. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Milner, R. M. (2018). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Murphy, G., Ching, D., Meehan, E., Twomey, J., Bolger, A., & Linehan, C. (2025). An average Joe, a laptop, and a dream: Assessing the potency of homemade political deepfakes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 39(2), e70061. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sharma, I., Jain, K., Behl, A., Baabdullah, A., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. (2023). Examining the motivations of sharing political deepfake videos: The role of political brand hate and moral consciousness. Internet Research, 33(5), 1727–1749. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-07-2022-0563 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Waisbord, S. (2023). Communication: A post-discipline. Polity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wasserman, H. (2020). The ethics of engagement: Media, conflict and democracy in Africa. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Walters, A., Ammari, T., Garimella, K., & Jhaver, S. (2023). Online knowledge production in polarized political memes: The case of critical race theory. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Beyond Mimesis: Algorithmic Empathy as a Cognitive Prosthesis a Case Study on Early-Onset Schizophrenia and Digital Mediation. from Chaos to the Timeline: Video Editing as a Thought Organizer.