Examining the Underlaying Factors of Low Achievement in the Geology Course (ECG253): A Data-Driven Study

Authors

Siti Nur Aishah Mohd Noor

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Doris Asmani Mat Yusof

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Nor Azizah Che Azmi

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Mohd Firdaus Mohd Akhbar

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Roslizayati Razali

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Mohamed Khatif Tawaf Mohamed Yusof

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Nur Syazwani Noor Rodi

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Diana Che Lat

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701117

Subject Category: Geology

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 16352-16360

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-09

Accepted: 2026-08-14

Published: 2026-08-22

Abstract

The attainment of program outcomes for the Geology course (ECG253) offered to the Diploma in Civil Engineering students in UiTM Pasir Gudang is evaluated. It was found that most of the students were incapable of demonstrating graduate attributes PO1 which is to apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialization to wide practical procedures and practices. Therefore, this study will investigate the underlying factors of low PO1 achievement in the Geology course among previous semester students. Analysis of the previous results shows that there was not just a gap in performance, but a deeper misalignment between course expectations and student readiness. This study also aims to find out the root causes that led to the low achievement of PO1 for this course in the previous semesters. A quantitative method was employed and a total of 300 students responded to the survey. Results of the survey indicate that most of the students perceived that they had limited time to gain a deep understanding of the course and they lacked a clear understanding of the intended learning outcomes. Majority of the students complained that the final exam questions were challenging in terms of length and effort required and they were indeed not well prepared for it. Hence, the problem of the low achievement of PO1 is feasible to be solved provided both lecturers and students make efforts in striving for the success of this course.

Keywords

Applying Knowledge; Geology Course; Outcome-Based Education; Programme Outcomes; Problem Solving

Downloads

References

1. Abet. (2020). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad Zakwan, F. A., Ismail, R., & Endut, Mohd. Z. (2022). Assessment Programme Outcomes (POs) of the Solid Mechanics Course for an Engineering Diploma Programme. International Journal of Practices in Teaching and Learning (IJPTL), 2(22). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alias, R., Saim, N. M., Noor, N.A.M., & Rosli, S.H. (2020). Cognitive domain performance for non-laboratory embedded and laboratory embedded course. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 206–222, 2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aziz, A., M.J., M., Megat Mohd Noor, M. J., Ali, A., & Jaafar, M. (2005). A Malaysian outcome-based engineering education model. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gurukkal, R. (2020). Outcome-Based Education: An Open Framework. Higher Education for the Future, 7, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Khan, M.S.H., Salele, N., Hasan, M., & Abdou B.O. (2023). Factors affecting student readiness towards OBE implementation in engineering education: Evidence from a developing country. Heliyon Journal, vol 9, issue 10, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lee, S. W., Jamal, M. H. Bin, Hasbullah, M. A. Bin, Ibrahim, M. J. B. M., Mohammad, S. N. Bin and Haron, H. A. Bin (2021) ‘Forensic Investigation on The High Failure Rate of Civil Engineering Solid Mechanics Course’, Asian Journal of University Education, 17(2), pp. 227–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Liu, M. (2022) ‘The Relationship between Students’ Study Time and Academic Performance and its Practical Significance’, BCP Education & Psychology, 7, pp. 412–415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Manaff Ismail, A., Ismail, R., Zakwan F. A. A., & Nizam Ismail, B. (2010). Implementation and assessment of outcome based education (OBE) in the Faculty of Civil Engineering at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). 2010 2nd International Congress on Engineering Education: Transforming [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mohammad, S.N., Ismail, N., Noor, M., Noh, N., Ibrahim, N. & Puaad, M.N.F.M. (2024) Performance of Students in Solid Mechanics Course and the Role of Fundamental Courses for Engineering Diploma Programme. International Journal Of Research And Innovation In Social Science (IJRISS), vol VIII, issue IIIS, September 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Morshidi, S. (2010). Strategic planning directions of Malaysia’s higher education: University autonomy in the midst of political uncertainties. Higher Education, 59(4), 461–473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Namasivayam, S., Al-Atabi, M., Chong, C. H., CHOONG, F., Fouladi, M., & Gamboa, R. (2013). A blueprint for measuring programme outcomes. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 8, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Namoun and Alshanqiti, A. (2020). Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analytics techniques: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 237, 2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Noor, N.A.M., Muhamad, N.S., Alias, R., Rosli, S.H. (2024). Analysis of program outcomes attainment for diploma in civil engineering at Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1673-1682, June 2024. ISSN: 2252-8822, Available: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Universiti Teknologi MARA. (n.d.). Diploma Program (CEEC110). Retrieved from https://ppkapp.uitm.edu.my/diploma-civil.php [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Walck-Shannon, E. M., Rowell, S. F. and Frey, R. F. (2021) ‘To what extent do study habits relate to performance?’, CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(1), pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yasmin, M., & Yasmeen, A. (2021). Viability of outcome-based education in teaching English as second language to chemical engineering learners. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 100–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.04.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles