Operational Service Accessibility and Membership Participation of Clients in Government Housing and Savings Program: Basis for Intervention

Authors

Donald Alton R. Cahilo

Home Development Mutal Fund, Region VI (Philippines)

Mary Ann E. Pet

Sangguniang Bayan, Municipal of Pontevedra (Philippines)

Ma. Quincy D. Dones

La Carlota City College (Philippines)

Lenny Mae C. Otero

La Carlota City College (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701162

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 16967-16983

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-13

Accepted: 2026-08-18

Published: 2026-08-23

Abstract

Government housing and savings programs aim to provide affordable housing and sustainable savings opportunities for low- and middle-income families, thereby reducing housing insecurity and promoting financial resilience. Despite these objectives, systemic challenges such as delayed project completion, affordability constraints, weak collection efficiency, and limited beneficiary engagement continue to undermine program effectiveness. This study investigated the relationship between service accessibility and membership participation in a national government housing and savings program. Service accessibility was measured across five dimensions: availability of services, accessibility of information, responsiveness of personnel, digital service accessibility, and convenience of transactions. Membership participation was assessed through contribution compliance, program awareness, availment of benefits, participation in agency activities, and overall engagement. A researcher-made survey instrument was employed, validated by five experts, yielding a validity index that confirmed the instrument’s appropriateness. Reliability testing using Cronbach’s Alpha produced acceptable results per variable, ensuring consistency and accuracy of measurement. The study involved 114 active members from a Local Member Services Office in Western Visayas during fiscal year 2026. Findings revealed that accessibility factors were significantly associated with participation. Results demonstrated that higher accessibility corresponded to stronger membership participation, while limited accessibility constrained engagement. These findings provide empirical evidence for government agencies, local government units, and program administrators to design interventions that enhance efficiency, transparency, and inclusivity. Beneficiaries stand to gain from improved affordability and service delivery, while future researchers may expand on these results to explore comparative and long-term impacts. Ultimately, the study underscores accessibility as critically associated with program sustainability and inclusivity in addressing housing and financial vulnerabilities among Filipino households.

Keywords

Operational Service Accessibility, Membership Participation of Clients, Government Housing and Savings Program.

Downloads

References

1. Abante, A. M. R. (2021). Geophilosophical realness of risk: A case study in National Housing Authority resettlement sites in Albay, Philippines. SN Applied Sciences, 3(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-52303/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almeida, F., & Santos, J. D. (2022). Digital transformation and the impact of transparency on public service efficiency. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 14(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR2022.0345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alvarez, F. D., Madridejos, J. M., Sarmiento, J. A., Valdez, E., & Lecaros, L. L. (2021). A framework for measuring geospatial amenity accessibility in the Philippines. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-4/W6, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W6-2021-19-2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ballesteros, M. M., & Ancheta, J. (2021). Participatory governance institutions for social housing in the Philippines: Do local housing boards matter? Philippine Journal of Development, 45(1a). https://doi.org/10.62986/pjd2021.45.1a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bayudan-Dacuycuy, C., & Dacuycuy, L. B. (2021). Labor market structures, pay gap, and skills in the Philippines (Discussion Paper No. 2021-28). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2021.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Commission on Audit, 2023 Commission on Audit. (2023). National Housing Authority Housing Programs (PAO-2023-04): Performance Audit Report. Quezon City, Philippines: Commission on Audit. Retrieved from https://coa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Contradicting Report Habitat for Humanity Philippines. (2023). Barriers to participation in government housing programs among informal settler families. Habitat for Humanity Research Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20345.67891 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cooper, M. (2021). Accessibility of virtual instruction during COVID-19: Challenges and compliance gaps. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1891467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cooperative Development Authority. (2021). Performance audit report (PAR) for cooperatives (Memorandum Circular No. 2021-04). Cooperative Development Authority. Retrieved from https://www.cda.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cruz, G. T., Cruz, C. J. P., & Saito, Y. (2021). Aging and health in the Philippines: A longitudinal study. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN & East Asia. https://doi.org/10.56501/20.500.12592/npvv9m [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cureg, E. F., & Ignacio, J. G. R. (2021). Confronting the Philippine housing situation and scanning potential solutions. Congressional Policy and Budget Research Department Policy Brief, 2021-07. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20371.91689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. De Tomas, J. R., & Hinlo, J. A. (2024). Financial service accessibility and regional economic participation in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Development Studies, 49(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.54097/pjds.v49i2.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dervisevic, E., Perova, E., & Sahay, A. (2021). Long-term impacts of short exposure to conditional cash transfers in adolescence: Evidence from the Philippines (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9617). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Faulkner, D., Verdouw, J., Cook, P., Tually, S., Liu, E., Judd, B., Barrie, H., & Coram, V. (2021). Ageing well in public housing (AHURI Final Report No. 369). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited. https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri3121701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ferrari, G. (2021). Addressing gender gaps in housing interventions: Guidance note. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1675-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Finkel, M., Hughes, M. M., & Hill, J. (2021). Gender equality in public administration: Global report. United Nations Development Programme & University of Pittsburgh. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789216040629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jonsson, O., Frögren, J., Haak, M., Slaug, B., & Iwarsson, S. (2021). Understanding the wicked problem of providing accessible housing for the ageing population in Sweden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, H. K. (2021). Tenure and participation decline in long-term savings programs: Evidence from institutional membership. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(9), 1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2021-0123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mahmood, A., Seetharaman, K., Jenkins, H.-T., & Chaudhury, H. (2021). Contextualizing innovative housing models and services within the age-friendly communities framework. The Gerontologist, 62(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mangaoang, E. M. D. (2021). Precarious work in the Philippine public sector: Nuances and prospects for reform. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 65(1–2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7989105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Medina-Guce, C., Velasco, L. G., & Rey, A. M. T. (2021). Baseline study on the state of participation in local government units: Participatory governance metrics for local development councils. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Monsura, M. P. (2021). Socioeconomic characteristics of households, government programs on human capital, and natural shocks as determinants of Philippine household income mobility. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21(4), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Monsura, M. P. (2021). Socioeconomic characteristics of households, government programs on human capital, and natural shocks as determinants of Philippine household income mobility. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21(4), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nguyen, T. H. (2023). Digital inequality in higher education: Accessibility and efficiency of online platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5673–5690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11567-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Orbeta, A. C., Melad, K. A. M., & Araos, N. V. V. (2021). Reassessing the impact of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program: Results of the third wave impact evaluation. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.53899/PSA2021-05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ortega, R. A., Amindalan, J. C. E., Camero, J. A. P., Parrocha, K. J. C., & Tablazon, A. J. P. (2021). Civil society organization participation in local governance: The case of Aringay, La Union [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University – Mid La Union Campus. https://lakasa.dmmmsu.edu.ph/handle/123456789/70 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). 2021 Annual Labor Market Statistics (Preliminary Results). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). 2021 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), Volume 1. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psada.psa.gov.ph/catalog/317/pdf-documentation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). Employment situation in July 2021. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Highlights of the 2021/2022 Integrated Survey on Labor and Employment (ISLE): Module on Employment. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Santos, R. J., & Cruz, M. A. (2021). Sustaining member engagement in cooperative housing programs: The role of institutional trust and perceived benefits. Journal of Housing and Community Development, 78(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2021.1934567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sol Cruz, R., Dela Peña, M., & Villanueva, J. (2021). Service accessibility and user satisfaction in Philippine public institutions. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.2021.1874569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tabuga, A., & Cabaero, C. C. (2021). Toward an inclusive social insurance coverage in the Philippines: Examining gender disparities (PIDS Research Paper Series No. 2021-06). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/rps2021.06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. UN-Habitat, 2022 Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB), & UN-Habitat. (2017). National Urban Development and Housing Framework 2017–2022. Manila, Philippines: HLURB, with technical assistance from UN-Habitat and the Philippine Institute of Environmental Planners. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Bank. (2021). Overcoming barriers to women’s economic empowerment in the Philippines. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/35094 https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1652-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yares, 2021 Yares, M. A. P. (2021). Is the government’s socialized housing program serving the needs of low-income households? The case of Davao City. Philippine e-Journal for Applied Research and Development, 11(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5521556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles