Technical English Vocabulary Proficiency and Reading Comprehension Skills of Students: Basis for Intervention

Authors

Ruel B. Concepcion

DepEd Negros Island Region, Philippines (Philippines)

Lenny Mae C. Otero

La Carlota City College, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800102

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 1439-1444

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-12

Accepted: 2026-08-17

Published: 2026-08-27

Abstract

The study employed a quantitative-descriptive correlational research design to assess the relationship between technical English vocabulary proficiency and reading comprehension skills among Grade 11 Organic Agriculture Production (OAP) students in Negros Occidental during the school year 2025–2026. The respondents consisted of the entire population of 105 students, selected through total enumeration sampling to ensure comprehensive representation. Data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire composed of two parts: twenty-five multiple-choice items measuring technical English vocabulary proficiency and nineteen passage-based items assessing reading comprehension strategies. To establish rigor, the instrument underwent content validation by a panel of experts in language education and agricultural instruction, ensuring clarity, relevance, and alignment with study objectives. Reliability was confirmed through the test–retest method, yielding exceptionally high Pearson correlation coefficients (technical vocabulary: r = 0.996, p < .001; reading comprehension: r = 0.997, p < .001), indicating strong stability and consistency of the tool. Results revealed distinct levels of proficiency in both technical vocabulary and comprehension skills, and statistical analysis tested the hypothesized relationship between the two variables. Findings underscored that vocabulary mastery significantly influenced comprehension outcomes, affirming the theoretical premise that linguistic competence serves as a gateway to disciplinary knowledge. The study provides evidence-based insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers, highlighting the need for integrated instructional approaches that strengthen technical language acquisition and comprehension skills to enhance academic success and professional readiness in agricultural education.

Keywords

Social Science

Downloads

References

1. Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Alqasham, F. H. (2022). Effectiveness of mind-mapping as a digital brainstorming technique in enhancing attitudes of Saudi EFL learners to writing skills. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.112022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aratea, M. L., Placido, C. A. L., Amarille, D. H. M., Tiu, A. M., Almodovar, L. P., Rells, J. L., & Grate-Orlando, M. J. (2023). Relationship of vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension of 2nd year BSED English major students of Gordon College A.Y. 2021–2022. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research, 7(11), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ayana, H., Mereba, T., & Alemu, A. (2024). Effect of vocabulary learning strategies on students’ vocabulary knowledge achievement and motivation: The case of Grade 11 high school students. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1399350. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1399350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Corpuz, J. M. M., Morales, A. N., Clarin, A. S., Dionio, B. B., & Cocolan, J. V. (2024). Students’ vocabulary skills in relation to their reading comprehension in language literature. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 2137–2149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Devera, M. I. (2021). Reading strategies and reading comprehension of the senior high school students. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Education, Law, and Technology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5171741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dimla, M. S., Eusebio, M. C., & Mendoza, A. C. (2021). Social network exposure and students’ vocabulary proficiency of second language: Basis for reading enrichment method. Cosmos: An International Journal of Art & Higher Education, 10(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.46360/cosmos.ahe.520212018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fabillaran, K. (2024). Reading profile assessment: The interplay of fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension among junior high school learners. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11058394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. García-Sánchez, J. N., & García-Martín, J. (2021). Cognitive strategies and textual genres in the teaching and evaluation of advanced reading comprehension (ARC). Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 723281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lawrence, J. F., Knoph, R., McIlraith, A., Kulesz, P. A., & Francis, D. J. (2021). Reading comprehension and academic vocabulary: Exploring relations of item features and reading proficiency. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Manggasang, J. T., & Belasoto, M. F. B. (2021). Level of reading comprehension among Grade 11 learners: Basis for instructional material development. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(9), 2333–2341. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i9-09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nation, I. S. P. (2021). Is it worth teaching vocabulary? TESOL Journal, 12(4), e564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schmitt, N., Dunn, K., O’Sullivan, B., Anthony, L., & Kremmel, B. (2021). Introducing knowledge-based vocabulary lists (KVL). TESOL Journal, 12(4), e622. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sun, Y., Wang, J., Dong, Y., Zheng, H., Yang, J., Zhao, Y., & Dong, W. (2021). The relationship between reading strategy and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 635289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tantalie, E. M. (2021). Influence of language preference on vocabulary proficiency and reading comprehension of selected Grade 10 bilingual students at MSU-Sulu Laboratory High School. RA Journal of Applied Research, 7(12), 2726–2740. https://doi.org/10.47191/rajar/v7i12.06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Waluyo, B., & Bucol, J. L. (2021). The impact of gamified vocabulary learning using Quizlet on low-proficiency students. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 158–179. http://callej.org/journal/22-1/Waluyo-Bucol2021.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Webb, S. (2021). Lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don’t know, and what needs to be examined. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(2), 278–293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles