Addressing Key Challenges in Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Converters: A Review of Voltage Gain Flexibility, Voltage Imbalance and Fault Detection

Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converters are widely employed in isolated bidirectional DC–DC power conversion for applications such as electric vehicles, renewable energy systems, aerospace, and solid-state transformers because of their high-power density, galvanic isolation, and soft-switching capability. However, their practical deployment remains constrained by several operational challenges, including restricted voltage gain flexibility, voltage imbalance in multilevel and modular configurations, and vulnerability to fault conditions during high-speed operation. Although numerous topological, control, and modulation-based solutions have been reported, most existing review papers classify these approaches according to methodology rather than the operational challenges they address, limiting direct comparison between different solution domains. To address this gap, this paper presents a challenge-oriented review of three major operational challenges in DAB converters: limited voltage gain flexibility, voltage imbalance in multilevel and modular systems, and fault detection and protection in high-speed operation. The reviewed solutions are systematically categorized into topology, control, and modulation domains and compared in terms of effectiveness, implementation complexity, computational burden, hardware requirements, and practical applicability. The comparative analysis shows that multilevel and modular topologies, such as Triple Active Bridge and modular high-frequency-transformer architectures, provide the greatest improvements in voltage gain flexibility, while active voltage balancing strategies that combine real-time control with modulation outperform passive balancing methods in multilevel and modular DAB systems. For fault detection, observer-based and sensorless topological methods deliver fast, low-cost diagnosis, whereas AI-driven and modulation-based approaches, such as pulse-injection and spread-spectrum monitoring, extend detection sensitivity at the cost of additional signal-processing complexity. Model Predictive Control emerges consistently across all three challenges as a strategy offering strong dynamic performance, though at higher computational cost. This review identifies current research gaps and outlines future research directions toward integrated, adaptive, and intelligent DAB converter architectures for next-generation power electronic systems.

Dual Active Bridge (DAB), Challenge-Oriented Review, Voltage Gain Flexibility, Voltage Balancing, Fault Detection and Protection

1. H. Jin, Y. Pei, L. Wang, J. Wen, C. Yang, and X. Dong, “Achieving Rated Power and ZVS for Dual Active Bridge Converter Considering the Interaction of Nonidealities,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 7867–7878, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3232662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. H. Ataullah et al., “Analysis of the Dual Active Bridge-Based DC-DC Converter Topologies, HF Transformer, and Control Techniques,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 23, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15238944. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Garcia-Bediaga et al., “Analytical and Normalized Equations to Implement the Optimized Triple Phase-Shift Modulation Strategy for DAB Converters,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3535–3546, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2023.3236097. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. L. Li, G. Xu, D. Sha, Y. Liu, Y. Sun, and M. Su, “Review of Dual-Active-Bridge Converters With Topological Modifications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 9046–9076, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3258418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. N. Fritz, D. Heidenberger, D. Bündgen, and R. W. De Doncker, “Flux Control Modulation for Three-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge DC-DC Converters.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. J. Huang, Z. Li, L. Shi, Y. Wang, and J. Zhu, “Optimized Modulation and Dynamic Control of a Three-Phase Dual Active Bridge Converter with Variable Duty Cycles,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2856–2873, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2842021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. J. Sun, L. Qiu, X. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Ma, and Y. Fang, “Improved Model Predictive Control for Three-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge Converters With a Hybrid Modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 4050–4064, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3126589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. N. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Chen, “A Novel DC-bias Current Suppression Strategy for DAB converter under TPS Modulation,” in 2024 IEEE 10th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, IPEMC 2024 ECCE Asia, pp. 1265–1269, 2024, doi: 10.1109/IPEMC-ECCEAsia60879.2024.10568013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. J. Wang, Y. Huang, and J. Hu, “Peak Current Optimized Hybrid Modulation for NPC DAB Converter with a Wide Voltage Range,” in 2024 CPSS & IEEE International Symposium on Energy Storage and Conversion (ISESC), pp. 929–934, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ISESC63657.2024.10785381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Z. Feng et al., “Loss Balance and Transient DC-Bias Suppression Strategies in Three-Level DAB Converters Modulated With Five DoFs,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8150–8164, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3262797. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. C. Liu, S. Zhou, J. Zou, X. Zou, H. Peng, and Y. Kang, “Hybrid-Type Multi-Level DAB Converter for High and Ultrawide Input-Voltage Range,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 16875–16881, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2024.3390749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. G. Xu, D. Sha, Y. Xu, and X. Liao, “Hybrid-Bridge-Based DAB Converter With Voltage Match Control for Wide Voltage Conversion Gain Application,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1378–1388, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2678524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. R. Chattopadhyay, G. Gohil, S. Acharya, V. Nair, and S. Bhattacharya, “Efficiency improvement of three port high frequency transformer isolated triple active bridge converter,” in 2018 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), pp. 1807–1814, 2018, doi: 10.1109/APEC.2018.8341262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. M. Dezhbord, S. Mohamadian, A. Ghasemian, C. Buccella, and C. Cecati, “Enhancing Voltage Gain and Assessing Current THD in Transformer of Photovoltaic Applications through a New Triple Active Bridge Converter,” in 2024 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp. 1–6, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595709. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. Mahdavifard and A. Khajehoddin, “Asymmetrical Modulation of DAB Converters for Voltage Gains Higher than Unity,” Jun. 2024, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1109/ECCEEurope62508.2024.10751894. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. L. Shu, W. Chen, M. Shi, R. Liu, S. Gao, and F. Deng, “Improved Control Strategy of Triple-Voltage Three-Phase DAB (T2-DAB) Converter for Current Stress and Zero-Voltage-Switching Optimization,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 773–784, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3060477. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jafari, M. S. Nikoo, F. Karakaya, and E. Matioli, “Enhanced DAB for Efficiency Preservation Using Adjustable-Tap HF Transformer,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 6673–6677, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2958632. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Y. Xia et al., “Modular DC Power Conversion System and Control Method for an Ultra-Wide Output Voltage Range of 5-500V Application,” in 2023 2nd Asia Power and Electrical Technology Conference (APET), pp. 338–343, 2023, doi: 10.1109/APET59977.2023.10489714. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. H. Xie, T. Zhang, Y. Zhou, R. Xie, and Y. Zhang, “The Triple Phase-Shift Control of DAB Converter with Reconfigurable Transformer to Optimize the RMS Current for Wide Voltage Applications,” in 2024 CPSS & IEEE International Symposium on Energy Storage and Conversion (ISESC), pp. 299–303, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ISESC63657.2024.10785486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Y. Qu, Z. Lu, W. Qiu, and G. Xu, “Modified EPS Control and Topology Modification for Two-Stage Bidirectional AC-DC Converter for V2G Applications,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2785, p. 12051, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2785/1/012051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. J. Tian, F. Wang, F. Zhuo, Y. Liu, and H. Deng, “A segmented-region optimum EPS modulation scheme based on unified parameter algorithm in DAB-based EV charger circuit,” IET Power Electronics, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1235–1250, 2024, doi: 10.1049/pel2.12621. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. C. Song, A. Sangwongwanich, Y. Yang, Y. Pan, and F. Blaabjerg, “Analysis and Optimal Modulation for 2/3-Level DAB Converters to Minimize Current Stress With Five-Level Control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4596–4612, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3235938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. J. He, Y. Chen, J. Lin, J. Chen, L. Cheng, and Y. Wang, “Review of Modeling, Modulation, and Control Strategies for the Dual-Active-Bridge DC/DC Converter,” Energies, vol. 16, pp. 6646–6677, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16186646. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. H. Feng et al., “Passive Capacitor Voltage Balancing of SiC-Based Three-Level Dual-Active-Bridge Converter Using Hybrid NPC-Flying Capacitor Structure,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 4183–4194, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3119210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. D. Babu Yelaverthi, M. Muneeb Ur Rehman, and R. Zane, “Differential Power Processing Three-Port Dual Active Bridge Converter for Active Balancing in Large Battery Packs,” in 2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp. 5591–5597, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2018.8558266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. W. Xiong, Q. Xie, G. Xu, G. Ning, and M. Su, “Coupled Inductor-Based DC–DC Converter With Bipolar Self-Balancing Voltage and Full Load Range of ZVS,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 6951–6962, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3522354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. J.-S. Hong, J.-I. Ha, S. Cui, and J. Hu, “Topology and Control of an Enhanced Dual-Active Bridge Converter With Inherent Bipolar Operation Capability for LVDC Distribution Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12774–12789, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3297389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Y. Li, D. Zuo, and H. Zhang, “Modeling and simulation of three level dual active half bridge based on PI control,” in Eighth International Conference on Energy System, Electricity, and Power (ESEP 2023), SPIE, 2024, p. 131599H, doi: 10.1117/12.3024210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. X. Ai, D. Zuo, and Y. Zhang, “Modeling and Simulation of Dual-Active-Bridge Based on PI Control,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2221, no. 1, p. 12007, May 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2221/1/012007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. J. Lee, H. Choi, and J. Jung, “Three level NPC dual active bridge capacitor voltage balancing switching modulation,” in 2017 IEEE International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC), pp. 438–443, 2017, doi: 10.1109/INTLEC.2017.8214175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. C. Luo and S. Huang, “Novel Voltage Balancing Control Strategy for Dual-Active-Bridge Input-Series-Output-Parallel DC-DC Converters,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 103114–103123, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999034. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. X. Li et al., “Model Predictive Control with Parameter Identification for DAB Converter Improving Dynamic and Static Performance,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on New Energy and Electrical Technology, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 288–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. M. López, N. Mijatovic, J. Rodriguez, and T. Dragičević, “Voltage Control Strategy for DAB power converter based on MDCS-MPC,” in 2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), pp. 584–588, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813869. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. M. López, N. Mijatovic, J. Rodríguez, and T. Dragičević, “Model Predictive Voltage and Current Control of Dual Active Bridge Using Enhanced Moving Discretized Control Set,” in IECON 2023 - 49th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.1109/IECON51785.2023.10312249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. T. Hagawane, M. R. Sindhu, and R. Patankar, “Model Predictive Control of Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter based on PWM plus TPS Modulation for Automotive Applications,” in 2022 International Virtual Conference on Power Engineering Computing and Control: Developments in Electric Vehicles and Energy Sector for Sustainable Future (PECCON), pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.1109/PECCON55017.2022.9851171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. T.-Q. Duong and S.-J. Choi, “Moving Discretized Control Set Model Predictive Control with Dominant Parameter Identification Strategy for Dual Active Bridge Converters,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 4, Art. no. 563, 2024, doi: 10.3390/math12040563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. H. Zhang et al., “A Model-Predictive-Control Strategy for Hybrid Dual Active Bridges Based DC Transformer,” in 2020 IEEE 9th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2020-ECCE Asia), pp. 2073–2079, 2020, doi: 10.1109/IPEMC-ECCEAsia48364.2020.9368180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. L. Dai et al., “Boundary Control Based Capacitor Voltage Balancing for Two/Three-Level Neutral-Point-Clamped Dual-Active-Bridge Converters,” in 2024 IEEE 10th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia), pp. 3101–3106, 2024, doi: 10.1109/IPEMC-ECCEAsia60879.2024.10567808. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. K. Oi, H. Higa, K. Morita, S. Urushibata, Y. Tadano, and Y. Sato, “Voltage Balancing Control of Bidirectional Input-Series Output-Series Dual Active Bridge DC/DC Converters without Auxiliary Circuits,” in 2022 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Himeji 2022-ECCE Asia), pp. 899–905, 2022, doi: 10.23919/IPEC-Himeji2022-ECCE53331.2022.9807147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. F. Zhang, Y. Ren, X. Yang, W. Chen, and H. Wu, “Capacitor Voltage Balancing Control for a Novel 5-Level Dual Active Bridge Converter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 14738–14754, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3194960. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. C. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and D. Yu, “Self-Adapting Voltage Balancing Method for IPOS DAB Converter With TPS Control,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1–6, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TASC.2024.3468072. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. H. Shi and H. Wen, “Multiple Natural Switching Surface Boundary Control of the Dual Active Bridge Converter,” in 2020 IEEE 9th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2020-ECCE Asia), pp. 1254–1259, 2020, doi: 10.1109/IPEMC-ECCEAsia48364.2020.9367808. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. C. Song, A. Sangwongwanich, Y. Yang, and F. Blaabjerg, “Capacitor Voltage Balancing for Multilevel Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 2566–2575, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3174287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. S. S. Khan and H. Wen, “Universal Sensorless Open-Circuit Fault Detection and Isolation Method of Dual-Active-Bridge Converters With Low-Cost Diagnostic Circuit,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 13652–13667, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3182382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. T. J. Nistane, K. Jayaraman, and S. Payami, “Transient Analysis and Detection of Terminal Short Circuit of Medium Frequency Transformer in Dual Active Bridge Converter,” in IECON 2023 - 49th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1–5, 2023, doi: 10.1109/IECON51785.2023.10312454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. H. Shi and H. Wen, “Fault detection method for dual active full-bridge convertor,” CN111237834A, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. C. Song, A. Sangwongwanich, and F. Blaabjerg, “Sensorless Open-Circuit-Fault Diagnosis Method for NPC-Based DAB Converter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 10699–10703, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3409060. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. J. Wu, M. Ma, and J. Liang, “An Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis And Location Method For Dual Active Bridge DC/DC Converter,” in 2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific), pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ITECAsia-Pacific56316.2022.9941894. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. S. S. Khan, H. Wen, H. Shi, Y. Hu, L. Jiang, and G. Chen, “Multiple Open-Circuit Fault Detection and Isolation Using Universal Low-Cost Diagnosis Circuits for Reconfigurable Dual-Active-Bridge Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 6504–6521, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3234592. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. F. Guo, X. Ren, Z. Li, and C. Han, “Observer-based fault detection for a dual-motor driving servo system,” in 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp. 6431–6436, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ChiCC.2016.7554368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. D.-D. Nguyen, G. Fujita, Q. Bui-Dang, and M. C. Ta, “Reduced-Order Observer-Based Control System for Dual-Active-Bridge DC/DC Converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 3426–3439, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2018.2810805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. J. Qi, F. Yu, X. Yue, and H. Xue, “State Observer-Based Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis and Localization Research of DAB Converter,” 2024, doi: 10.1109/ICPST61417.2024.10602052. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Z. Xing, J. Chen, Y. Zhao, Y. Fu, Y. He, and W. Zhang, “An Online Open-Switch Fault Diagnosis Method for the DAB Converter Based on Multimodal Fusion Neural Controlled Differential Equations,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3234093. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. E. Ribeiro, A. J. M. Cardoso, and C. Boccaletti, “Fault analysis of dual active bridge converters,” in IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 398–403, 2012, doi: 10.1109/IECON.2012.6388787. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. C. Liu, X. Zou, S. Zhou, H. Peng, and Y. Kang, “Pulse Injection Modulation Method for Current-Fed Dual Active Bridge Converter With Full Load Range ZVS Under Wide Input-Voltage Range,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 2668–2673, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3457847. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. D. Xie and X. Ge, “Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis of Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter Based on Residual Analysis,” in 2018 IEEE International Power Electronics and Application Conference and Exposition (PEAC), pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1109/PEAC.2018.8590495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. C. Hu, A. Guo, Y. Deng, and M. Luo, “Application of Spread Spectrum Time Domain Method in New Energy Cable Fault Detection,” in 2024 International Conference on Electronics and Devices, Computational Science (ICEDCS), pp. 7–13, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ICEDCS64328.2024.00007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. V. Taylor and M. Faulkner, “Line monitoring and fault location using spread spectrum on power line carrier,” IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 427–434, 1996, doi: 10.1049/ip-gtd:19960189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar