Mathematics Self-Concept, Technology-Enhanced Learning and Mathematics Literacy of Grade 10 Students

This study examined the influence of mathematics self-concept and technology-enhanced learning on the mathematics literacy of Grade 10 students and explored the relationships among these variables. Using a descriptive-correlational design, the study involved Grade 10 students enrolled in the Science, Technology, and Vocational Education Program in a public secondary school in Negros Occidental. Data were collected through researcher-made and standardized questionnaires. Findings showed that most respondents were female, came from low-income households, and had access to digital devices and internet connectivity. Students demonstrated a high level of mathematics self-concept and technology-enhanced learning, while their mathematics literacy was at a moderate level. They performed better in interpreting and evaluating mathematical information than in formulating and applying mathematical concepts. The results further revealed a significant relationship between mathematics self-concept and mathematics literacy, whereas technology-enhanced learning was not significantly related to mathematics literacy. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening students’ confidence and positive self-beliefs in mathematics while ensuring that technology is effectively integrated into instruction to enhance mathematics literacy.

NA

1. Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). Socio-psychological factors and mathematics achievement of Filipino learners. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 53(1), 59–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Drijvers, P., Ball, L., Barzel, B., Heid, M. K., Cao, Y., & Maschietto, M. (2020). Uses of technology in lower secondary mathematics education. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2020). Achievement emotions and student engagement in mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Good, C., & Scates, D. (2020). Instrument validation guidelines (3rd ed.). Research Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gravemeijer, K., van Eerde, D., Hall, R., & Terwel, J. (2020). Mathematics education reform trends and issues. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Xu, J. (2021). Self concept and academic achievement: A multinational study. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Stacey, K. (2020). Mathematics education for a digital era: Global perspectives on technology and innovation. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Journals / Articles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in secondary mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(4), 715–735. https://link.springer.com/journal/13394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Digital technology in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1749–1771. https://link.springer.com/journal/11423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1–12. www.jstor.org/journal/eductechsoci [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, M. (2022). Teachers' technology integration practices: Moving beyond self-report. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(1), 69–85. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jte [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2021). The effects of digital tools in mathematics education. Computers & Education, 172, 104250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computers-and-education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pugalee, D. K., & Choppin, J. (2020). Contextualized mathematics problem solving. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 9(2), 97–115. https://pubs.nctm.org/view/journals/mte/mte-overview.xml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Santos-Trigo, M., & Reyes-Rodríguez, A. (2020). Inquiry and active learning with technology. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2021). Competence beliefs and mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 201–221. https://link.springer.com/journal/10649 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2020). Mathematics self-concept and student engagement. School Psychology International, 41(4), 304–322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/spi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Stillman, G., & Brown, L. (2020). Mathematical modeling and students' struggles. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100742. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-mathematical-behavior [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wang, L. (2022). Students' self-concept and its influence on mathematics performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 456–470. https://psycnet.apa.org/journal/edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhang, C., Solheim, O. J., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Self-concept and mathematics literacy outcomes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 876–894. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tmes20/current [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2017). Research on technology in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. https://pubs.nctm.org/view/journals/jrme/jrme-overview.xml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Online Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. CHED. (2022). Policies and standards for Mathematics literacy in secondary education. Commission on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum Guide: Mathematics Grade 10. DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. DepEd. (2021). Mathematics 10 Learner’s Module. Department of Education, Philippines. https://deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. DepEd. (2022). Mathematics K to 12 Curriculum Guide. Department of Education, Philippines. https://deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 results: What students know and can do. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. UNESCO. (2018). ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (Version 3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples