Administrative Practices of School Heads in Relation to the Engagement of Teachers and Parents

Authors

Joenel P. Zamora

DepEd - Negros Occidental, Philippines (Philippines)

Luciano T. Magallanes

La Carlota City College, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800306

Subject Category: Public Administration

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 4635-4646

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-21

Accepted: 2026-08-26

Published: 2026-09-03

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the administrative practices of school heads and their relationship to the engagement of teachers and parents in a School Division in Negros Occidental during School Year 2026. Specifically, it assessed the extent of administrative practices of school heads toward teachers in terms of monitoring and evaluation, resource management and allocation, personnel management and welfare, and accountability and records management. It also examined administrative practices toward parents in terms of parent involvement strategies, conflict resolution and support, structured communication and engagement, and transparency and accountability. Furthermore, the study determined the level of engagement of teachers and parents and examined the relationship between administrative practices and stakeholder engagement. The study employed a descriptive-quantitative research design using a researcher-made questionnaire to determine the extent of administrative practices and level of engagement. Findings revealed that administrative practices toward teachers and parents were implemented to a very high extent, while stakeholder engagement was also very high. However, no significant relationships were found between administrative practices and teacher and parent engagement. The study recommends strengthening stakeholder engagement initiatives and exploring other factors affecting participation.

Keywords

Education

Downloads

References

1. Bush, T. (2020). School leadership and management in education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220902083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2021). Effective teacher professional development. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 29(35), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dela Peña, J. A., & Escueta, E. F. (2022). Parental involvement and school–community partnership in Philippine public schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 9(2), 12–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2020: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/02/17/do-024-s-2020-national-adoption-and-implementation-of-the-philippine-professional-standards-for-school-heads/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education. (2025). DepEd memorandum circular on school leadership and engagement. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Flores, M. L., & Navarro, R. T. (2023). School leadership practices and parental engagement in Philippine elementary schools. Philippine Journal of Education Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). ‘Like a rug had been pulled from under you’: Teacher experiences during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. OECD. (2021). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264383937-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles