Security Implications of Transboundary Rivers in the 21st Century

Transboundary rivers serve as both fault lines of conflict and lifelines of collaboration, making it one of the most contentious strategic resources of the twenty-first century. Nearly 263 rivers are transboundary and collectively sustain over 40 percent of the global population, but increasing demographic pressure, climate change, and inter-state competition are increasing their security stakes. This study critically examines hydro-politics dynamics of some selected basins: the Nile Basin (Egypt–Ethiopia–Sudan) that is defined by conflict over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam; the Indus Basin (India–Pakistan) that is marked by precarious cooperation despite a robust treaty regime; and the Tigris–Euphrates Basin (Turkey–Iraq–Syria) where downstream scarcity and volatility were compounded by upstream damming. Following Environmental Security Theory and paradigms of Resource Scarcity–Conflict, the study analyzes the linkage between water scarcity and food security, energy needs, migration, and regional stability. The findings indicate that collaborative institutions do exist but are vulnerable, reflecting the open nature of international river management to geopolitics. The contention of this paper is that strong hydro-diplomacy, robust treaties, and regional institutions are necessary in avoiding the security threat posed by shared rivers. It emphasizes the imperative significance of rethinking water not merely as a development issue but as the cornerstone upon which international peace and security must be constructed.

Security, Transboundary Rivers, Hydroplitics, Conflict and Cooperation.

1. Allan, J. A. (2001). The Middle East water question: Hydropolitics and the global economy. I.B. Tauris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allan, J. A. (2011). Virtual water: Tackling the threat to our planet’s most precious resource. I.B. Tauris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barnett, J., & Adger, W. N. (2007). Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bilgen, A. (2023) The disruptive power of open-source water data: The case of the Euphrates-Tigris Basin. London School of Economics and Political Science, Middle East Centre Blog, 13 January [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brauch, H. G. (2016). Globalization and environmental challenges: Reconceptualizing security in the 21st century. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cascão, A. E. (2009). Changing power relations in the Nile River basin: Unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Alternatives, 2(2), 245–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cascão, A. E. (2009). Political economy of water resources management and allocation in the Nile Basin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cascão, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010). Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. In Earle, A., Jägerskog, A., & Öjendal, J. (Eds.), Transboundary water management: Principles and practice (pp. 27–42). Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cronin, R. (2013). Mekong muddle: Conflicting interests in the Mekong River Basin. Stimson Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dalby, S. (2013). Climate change and environmental security. The Geographical Journal, 179(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dinar, S., Dinar, A., McCaffrey, S., & McKinney, D. (2007). Bridges over water: Understanding transboundary water conflict, negotiation and cooperation. World Scientific. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eyler, B. (2019). Last days of the mighty Mekong. Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2020). The state of food and agriculture 2020. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gleditsch, N. P., Furlong, K., Hegre, H., Lacina, B., & Owen, T. (2006). Conflicts over shared rivers: Resource scarcity or fuzzy boundaries? Political Geography, 25(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gleick, P. H. (2014). The world’s water volume 8: The biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994). Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: Evidence from cases. International Security, 19(1), 5–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Immerzeel, W. W., van Beek, L. P. H., & Bierkens, M. F. P. (2010). Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science, 328(5984), 1382–1385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Matthew, R. A. (2002). Environmental security: Demystifying the concept, clarifying the stakes. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 8, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Matthew, R., Barnett, J., & McDonald, B. (2010). Global environmental change and human security. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. McCaffrey, S. C. (2019). The UN Watercourses Convention: A retrospective. Water International, 44(7-8), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1631552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mustafa, D., Akhter, M., & Nasrallah, N. (2013). Understanding Pakistan’s water–security nexus. Peaceworks No. 88. United States Institute of Peace. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. National Intelligence Council. (2021). Global trends 2040: A more contested world. NIC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. OECD. (2012). Environmental outlook to 2050: The consequences of inaction. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Okpara, U. T., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., & Bila, M. D. (2015). Conflicts about water in Lake Chad: Are environmental, vulnerability and security issues linked? Progress in Development Studies, 15(4), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993415592738 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Raleigh, C., & Urdal, H. (2007). Climate change, environmental degradation and armed conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 674–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.06.0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sithirith, M. (2016). The politics of the Mekong River Basin: Challenges for transboundary river management. Water International, 41(5), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1184382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Swain, A. (2011). Challenges for water sharing in the Nile basin: Changing geo-politics and changing climate. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(4), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.577037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNESCO. (2020). World water development report 2020: Water and climate change. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. United Nations (UN). (2023). World water development report 2023. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2012). Global environment outlook 5 (GEO-5): Environment for the future we want. UNEP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UN-Water. (2020). The United Nations World Water Development Report: Water and climate change. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. WHO/UNICEF. (2021). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2020: Five years into the SDGs. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wolf, A. T. (1998). Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy, 1(2), 251–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wolf, A. T., Natharius, J. A., Danielson, J. J., Ward, B. S., & Pender, J. K. (1999). International river basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 15(4), 387–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629948682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2003.0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. World Bank. (2016). High and dry: Climate change, water, and the economy. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. World Bank. (2019). The global water crisis: Progress and challenges. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. World Bank. (2021). Water scarcity and security. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). (2022). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2022: Groundwater – Making the invisible visible. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony – a framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2006.054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
• Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
• Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
• Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)