Beyond The Desire to Migrate: A Five-Dimensional Measurement of International Migration Intention among Skilled Workers

Authors

Noor Azzura Mohamed

Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Mohd Najib Md Saad

Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Amir Imran Zainoddin

Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800336

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 5141-5153

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-19

Accepted: 2026-08-24

Published: 2026-09-04

Abstract

International migration intention is widely used to anticipate prospective mobility and skilled-worker emigration, yet its measurement remains conceptually fragmented. Existing studies variously operationalise future migration as desire, aspiration, intention, plan, preparation, expectation, or likelihood of moving. These approaches are useful for particular research purposes, but they can obscure the difference between wanting to migrate and having a more developed, actionable orientation toward migration. Using an integrative conceptual review, this paper synthesises migration survey practices, aspirations-capabilities scholarship, and migration decision-making research to derive and delimit five proposed dimensions of international migration intention. The paper conceptualises international migration intention as a multidimensional pre-migration orientation comprising desire, plan, preparation, timing, and perceived migration control. The proposed International Migration Intention Five-Dimensional Measure (IMI-5D) integrates established distinctions in migration survey research with scholarship on migration decision-making, temporal horizons, and agency. Fifteen candidate items are proposed, with three items representing each dimension. At this conceptual stage, IMI-5D is positioned primarily as a multidimensional profile measure rather than as a validated composite scale, and no overall IMI score is assumed. The dimensions are treated as related components rather than compulsory stages because prospective migrants can display different profiles, such as strong desire but limited preparation, or clear planning but low perceived control. The paper argues that this multidimensional approach can improve construct clarity, cross-study comparability, and the interpretation of skilled-worker mobility intentions. The proposed structure, items, scoring approach, and response format remain provisional and require staged empirical validation before IMI-5D can be described as a validated measurement scale.

Keywords

international migration intention, skilled workers, multidimensional measurement, perceived migration control, IMI-5D

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aslany, M., Carling, J., Mjelva, M. B., & Sommerfelt, T. (2021). Systematic review of determinants of migration aspirations (QuantMig Project Deliverable D2.2). University of Southampton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Assfaw, A. K., & Minaye, A. (2022). Explaining migration intention from selected psycho-social variables in South Wollo, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 960203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.960203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balu, R. (2018). Salient beliefs that influence the Malaysian engineer's intention to migrate abroad. Border Crossing, 8(1), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v8i1.586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Caliendo, M., Cobb-Clark, D. A., Hennecke, J., & Uhlendorff, A. (2019). Locus of control and internal migration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 79, 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carling, J. (2019). Measuring migration aspirations and related concepts. MIGNEX Background Paper. Peace Research Institute Oslo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carling, J., & Mjelva, M. B. (2021). Survey instruments and survey data on migration aspirations (QuantMig Project Deliverable D2.1). University of Southampton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Carling, J., & Schewel, K. (2018). Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 945-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Czaika, M., Bijak, J., & Prike, T. (2021). Migration decision-making and its key dimensions. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 697(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211052233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. de Haas, H. (2021). A theory of migration: The aspirations-capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. de Jong, P. W., & de Valk, H. A. G. (2020). Intra-European migration decisions and welfare systems: The missing life course link. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(9), 1773-1791. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1611421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fouarge, D., Ozer, M. N., & Seegers, P. (2019). Personality traits, migration intentions, and cultural distance. Papers in Regional Science, 98(6), 2425-2454. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2024). Humanising research on migration decision-making: A situated framework. Open Research Europe, 3, 142. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16483.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kulka, A., Nikolka, T., Poutvaara, P., & Uebelmesser, S. (2025). International applicability of education and migration aspirations. Journal of Economic Geography, 25(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Manchin, M., & Orazbayev, S. (2018). Social networks and the intention to migrate. World Development, 109, 360-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Migali, S., & Scipioni, M. (2019). Who's about to leave? A global survey of aspirations and intentions to migrate. International Migration, 57(5), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mjelva, M. B., & Carling, J. (2023). Surveys on migration aspirations, plans and intentions: A comprehensive overview. Open Research Europe, 3, 145. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15800.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Norhayati, S., Krishnaswamy, J., Dahlan, A., & Chau, A. W. (2018). The influence of new economic model on intention to work abroad: An empirical study to address brain drain issue in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, Special Issue 4, 99-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sabti, Y. M. (2022). Influence of home country push factors on intention to migrate among Iraqi medical doctors [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tjaden, J., Auer, D., & Laczko, F. (2019). Linking migration intentions with flows: Evidence and potential use. International Migration, 57(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2013). Explaining emigration intentions and behaviour in the Netherlands, 2005-10. Population Studies, 67(2), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.725135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Williams, A. M., Jephcote, C., Janta, H., & Li, G. (2018). The migration intentions of young adults in Europe: A comparative, multilevel analysis. Population, Space and Place, 24(1), e2123. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles