The Power of Dialogue in Conditions of Care and Climate: A Feminist Participatory and Intersectional Study of Dalit Women’s and Girls’ Unpaid Care Labour in Coastal Bangladesh

Authors

Kundu Amitav Kumar

Political Science, University of Dhaka (Bangladesh)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800387

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 5934-5951

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-21

Accepted: 2026-08-26

Published: 2026-09-06

Abstract

This study was conducted with Dalit women and Girls from the Clobber community in the coastal zone of Tala Upazila, Satkhira, which is predominantly affected by salinity and flooding due to climate change. Vulnerabilities of Dalit communities are deeply rooted in their anthropological issues that produced untouchability, which confines them to stigmatized caste-assigned labor. However, Dalit women and girls are experiencing compounded, gendered, and intergenerational forms of exclusion and care burden. These vulnerabilities are further intensified through their intersections with age, poverty, religion, disability, entrenched social norms, and geographically specific contexts, producing layered and unequal experiences of risks, exclusion, and deprivations.

Keywords

Unpaid care work; Dalit women; Intersectionality; Feminist political economy

Downloads

References

1. Bangladesh: Left behind in the storm: Dalit women sanitation workers and the fight for water and dignity - Amnesty International. (2025, October 18). Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa13/0372/2025/en/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, A. U., Alam, M., & Rahman, A. (2019). Bangladesh climate change strategy and gender dimensions. International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). (2022). Time use survey 2021. Government of Bangladesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. BRAC. (2018). The impact of climate change on women in coastal Bangladesh. BRAC Institute of Governance and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elson, D. (1998). The economic, the political and the domestic: Businesses, states and households in the organisation of production. New Political Economy, 3(2), 189–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Federici, S. (2012). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. PM Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Raihan, S., Khan, T., & Uddin, M. (2020). Climate change, poverty, and inequality in Bangladesh. SANEM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rao, N., Lawson, E. T., Raditloaneng, W. N., Solomon, D., & Angula, M. (2020). Gendered vulnerabilities to climate change: Insights from the global south. World Development, 129, 104880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rege, S. (2013). Against the madness of Manu: B.R. Ambedkar’s writings on Brahmanical patriarchy. Navayana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. UN Women Bangladesh. (2021). Recognizing, reducing and redistributing unpaid care work in Bangladesh. UN Women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles