Factors of Childfree Choice: Insights from Malay Individuals in Malaysia

The decision to remain childfree, defined as a deliberate choice to forgo having children, reflects a growing trend influenced by modern societal and economic dynamics. This qualitative study explores the multifaceted factors shaping childfree choices among Malay individuals in Malaysia, revealing a complex interplay of social and economic determinants. Through semi-structured and in-depth interviews with five informants, key themes emerged, including busy lifestyles, employer expectations, personal freedom, love-based marriages, shared values in marriage, a supportive social system, the absence of societal pressure, and concerns about financial instability. Findings indicate that demanding careers and economic uncertainties, particularly in the post-COVID-19 era, deter parenthood. At the same time, autonomy, mutual agreement, and supportive communities empower childfree choices, even in a traditionally pronatalist Malay cultural context. The study highlights a shift toward individualized definitions of marital fulfilment, challenging conventional family norms. Limitations include a small, non-representative sample and reliance on self-reported data, suggesting the need for mixed-methods and longitudinal research to enhance generalizability and explore evolving trends. Recommendations include developing family-friendly workplace policies, such as flexible work arrangements and affordable childcare, which could mitigate barriers to parenthood for those who desire it, as well as community interventions, while simultaneously studying their impact on childfree trends.

Childfree, marriage, trend, Malaysia, factors

1. Abdullah, A. S., Nai, P. T., Mahpul, I. N., Azman, N. A. A., & Hamid, R. A. (2021). Correlates and consequences of delayed marriage in Malaysia’, Institutions and Economies, 13(4), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.22452/IJIE.vol13no4.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alosaimi, N. R. O., Kadir, F. A. B. A., & Zaidan, A. M. (2024). The concept of values from a Quranic perspective. Quranica, 16(2, Special Issue 12), 546–578. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.085217013614&partnerID=40&md5=c7db62c01aac1f2915c6f4c816d4728c [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abidin, R. Z. (2019). Exploring Married Malay Couples’ Conceptions of a Satisfying Marriage: Some Implications for the Education of Family Counsellors’, IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 7(2), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v7i2.264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bimha, P. Z. J., & Chadwick, R. (2016). Making the Childfree Choice: Perspectives of Women Living in South Africa. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 26(5), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2016.1208952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carroll, L. (2018). The intentionally childless marriage. In Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness: The Joys of Otherhood? (pp. 217-235). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Corbett, L. (2018). Other than Mother: The Impact of Voluntary Childlessness on Meaning in Life, and the Potential for Positive Childfree Living. International Journal of Existential Psychology & Psychotherapy, 7(2), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dew, J. & Wilcox, W. B. (2011). If Momma ain’t happy: Explaining declines in marital satisfaction among new mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00782.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dutra, R. (2022). Differentiation of society, social inequality, and individualization: Re-interpretation of the thesis of Ulrich Beck [Diferenciação da sociedade, desigualdade social e individualização: Uma reinterpretação da tese de Ulrich Beck]. Lua Nova, 116, 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-197228/116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gloor, J. L. P., Okimoto, T. G., & King, E. B. (2022). “Maybe baby?” The employment risk of potential parenthood. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52, 623-642. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hamzah, F. & Mulud, Z. A. (2025). Exploring the Psychosocial Impacts on Childless Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation Treatment in Malaysia: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Health Science and Medical Research, 43 (5), 1-9. 10.31584/jhsmr.20251171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haneman, V.J. (2017) Marriage, Millennials, and Massive Student Loan Debt. Concordia Law Review, 2, 103-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Harahap, I., Siregar, F. A., & Hariyanto, E. (2025). Understanding The Rise of Childfree Marriage: Avoiding Toxic Family, Being Happy and Well Without Children Despite Contradiction with Maqashid al-Sharia. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.9984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Höglund, B., & Hildingsson, I. (2023). Why and when choosing child-free life in Sweden? Reasons, influencing factors and personal and societal factors: Individual interviews during 2020–2021. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 35, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Honcharova, О., & Kuryliak, V. (2021). The model of development of precarious practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Society, religion, and individual. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, 41(8), 53–77. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175986702&partnerID=40&md5=96eca00bb5486f9ed04c7b88e544e32e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Howard, C. (2019). Individualization. In A. Elliott (Ed.), Routledge handbook of identity studies (2nd ed., pp. 130–146). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ismail, R. A. M. (2025). The Childfree Trend: Regional Perspectives, Socioeconomic Impacts, and Policy Responses. Penang: Penang Institute Monographs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jacobs, A. A. (2017). Childfree employees: The effects of flexible work arrangements and childfree-friendly culture on organisational commitment. Master’s Dissertation. University of Cape Town. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Komala, D., & D. W., M. T. W. (2022). Proses pengambilan keputusan pada pasangan suami istri yang memilih untuk tidak memiliki anak. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 6(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v6i1.13536.2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kowal, M., Groyecka-Bernard, A., Kochan-Wójcik, M., & Sorokowski, P. (2021). When and how does the number of children affect marital satisfaction? An international survey. PLoS ONE 16(4): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lee, M. & Zeman, K. (2024). Childlessness in Korea: Role of education, marriage postponement, and marital childlessness’, Demographic Research, 51, 669–686. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2024.51.21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lutfiyah, I., & Maksum, M. (2023). Makna Childfree Dalam Rangka Mengurangi Fertilitas Pada Pasangan Siap Menikah. PANOPTIKON: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 92-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Morison, T., Macleod, C., Lynch, I., Mijas, M., & Shivakumar, S. T. (2015). Stigma Resistance in Online Childfree Communities: The Limitations of Choice Rhetoric. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315603657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mu’in, F., Miswanto, Edy, R. N., Santoso, R., & Fikri, A. (2024). Childfree in modern Muslim communities of Lampung and West Java provinces: A Maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah perspective. El-Usrah, 7(2), 860–877. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.22400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nabila, W., Al Jauza, H., Maryam, Hannisyah, H., Faizah, I. N., Zahra, F. U., Alifah, Saroh, M., Hidayat, F., & Abasir, M. A. (2024). A Feminist Study of the Childfree Trend in Generation Z: A Normative Review. Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v2i02.142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nisa, E. F. (2020). Battling marriage laws: Early marriage and online youth piety in Indonesia. Hawwa, 42(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692086-12341387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pedersen, H. (2025). Childfree by choice in Norway: The link between voluntary childlessness and subjective wellbeing in the context of national socio-political pronatalism and a growing global population. Master's thesis, The University of Bergen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rahmayanti, N. (2022). Childfree sebagai pilihan hidup Perempuan berkeluarga di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Master’s Thesis. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Samsudi, S., & Busro. (2023). Between Liberty and Faith: Exploring the Dynamics of Childfree Choices in the Islamic Perspective of Malaysia. Tashwirul Afkar, 42(1), 69-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tori, N. A., Sharif-Nia, H., Ghaffari, F., Behmanesh, F., & Pourreza, A. (2023). Effective factors on voluntary childlessness and one-child tendency from couples’ perspective: Compulsory childlessness or child-avoidance?. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, 14(4), 656-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjim.14.4.656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Stanziani, M., Cox, J., MacNeil, E., & Carden, K. (2024). Implicit gender role theory, gender system justification, and voting behavior: A mixed-method study. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 21(3), 1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00966-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study