Designing AI Literacy Curricula for Higher Education: A Comparative Framework

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a defining force in education, transforming how knowledge is created, evaluated, and shared. However, universities still face challenges in integrating AI literacy effectively into their curricula. Current efforts, opinions, and ideas vary widely. Some concentrate on technical skills, while others emphasise ethics or social impacts, often without pedagogical alignment or supporting research. This study offers a Structured Literature Review (SLR) of 87 peer-reviewed sources (2018–2025) from Scopus-indexed journals, including Computers & Education, AI & Society, British Journal of Educational Technology, Nature Machine Intelligence, and the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. The SLR synthesises conceptual, pedagogical, and governance perspectives to create the AI Literacy Design Matrix (AILDM). This matrix serves as a comparative framework identifying four interconnected curriculum design dimensions: conceptual, ethical, productive, and participatory. The review reveals that, although higher education worldwide acknowledges the importance of AI literacy, most programmes remain fragmented, with limited integration of ethics or civic aspects. The AILDM proposes a framework for designing balanced curricula that foster understanding, creativity, and responsibility. The paper concludes that AI literacy should be regarded as a civic and epistemic infrastructure, and therefore integrated across disciplines rather than confined to computer science.

AI literacy; higher education; curriculum design

1. Amershi, S. et al. (2019) ‘Guidelines for human–AI interaction’, Proceedings of CHI 2019, ACM, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AU (African Union) (2020) Digital Transformation Strategy for Africa (2020–2030). Addis Ababa: African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bawden, D. (2008) ‘Origins and concepts of digital literacy’, Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 30(1), pp. 17–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Belshaw, D. (2012) . The Essential Elements of Digital Literacies. Durham: Durham University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Benjamin, R. (2019) . Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011) . Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Boell, S. K. & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015) ‘On being systematic in literature reviews in IS’, Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), pp. 161–173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Borenstein, J. et al. (2021) ‘Teaching ethics in AI courses: Approaches and challenges’, AI & Society, 36(3), pp. 783–792. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bruner, J. (1966) . Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. (2018) ‘Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification’, Proceedings of FAT, pp. 77–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chan, C. K. Y. & Yuen, M. C. (2023) ‘University teachers’ readiness for AI-integrated pedagogy’, Computers & Education, 194, 104686. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chan, C. K. Y. et al. (2021) ‘Designing AI learning experiences in higher education’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), pp. 2030–2048. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chin, K. H. et al. (2023) ‘Developing AI literacy through inquiry-based learning’, Computers & Education, 205, 104863. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Crawford, K. (2021) . Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dede, C. (2022) ‘Future-ready learning ecosystems and AI’, Educational Technology Research & Development, 70(6), pp. 2741–2756. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Denyer, D. & Tranfield, D. (2009) ‘Producing a systematic review’, in Buchanan, D. & Bryman, A. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Research Methods. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dignum, V. (2019) . Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI Responsibly. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Druga, S. et al. (2023) ‘Children’s mental models of AI: 10 years later’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(1), pp. 181–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. European Commission (2020) Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027). Brussels: European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. European Commission/JRC (2022) DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ferreira, J. A. (2023) ‘AI education in Brazilian universities: Opportunities and challenges’, Computers in Human Behaviour, 142, 107662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Floridi, L. (2019) The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Goosen, W. (2024) ‘Structured incubators and AI literacy in African higher education’, AI & Society, 39(2), pp. 411–425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hakkarainen, K. & Hietajärvi, L. (2022) ‘Teacher education for AI-era learning’, Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), pp. 6331–6351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Henrickson, L. A. (2021) ‘Students’ affective responses to AI tutors’, Computers & Education, 175, 104323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Holmes, W., Bialik, M. & Fadel, C. (2019) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Centre for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jobin, A., Ienca, M. & Vayena, E. (2019) ‘The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines’, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), pp. 389–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jordan, M. (2019) ‘Artificial intelligence—The revolution hasn’t happened yet’, Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lau, J. & Wong, A. (2023) ‘Ethics sandboxes for AI education’, AI & Ethics, 3(4), pp. 775–788. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lee, D. H. (2023) ‘AI literacy education in Korea: Trends and implications’, Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), pp. 221–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lim, S. Y. et al. (2021) ‘Developing national AI curricula: The Singapore experience’, Computers & Education, 172, 104263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Long, D. & Magerko, B. (2020) ‘What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations’, Proceedings of CHI 2020, pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Luckin, R. et al. (2016) Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mitchell, M. (2019) Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ng, W. (2012) Digital Literacy: Concepts and Implications for Education. Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ng, D. T. K. et al. (2021) ‘AI literacy: A multi-dimensional framework for education’, Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Noble, S. U. (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nørgård, R. T. (2022) ‘The complexity of AI in higher education: Critical design literacy’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), pp. 1649–1667. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. OECD (2021) Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with AI, Blockchain and Robots. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. OECD (2023) AI and Education Policy Report. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Prado, J. C. & Marzal, M. A. (2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study