Water Governance and Infrastructure Resilience Risk Governance and Resilient Water Infrastructure Delivery in Mufulira District, Zambia: A Qualitative Case Study
Authors
Cavendish University Zambia (Zambia)
Cavendish University Zambia (Zambia)
Cavendish University Zambia (Zambia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800543
Subject Category: Public Administration
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 8286-8294
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-25
Accepted: 2026-08-31
Published: 2026-09-11
Abstract
Reliable water infrastructure is a natural-resource-management priority in mining and industrial districts, where service systems are exposed to financial, technical, environmental, institutional and operational uncertainty. This study examined how risk-management practices shape water-infrastructure delivery and service reliability in Mufulira District, Zambia. An interpretivist qualitative case study used semi-structured interviews with 25 purposively selected participants: five water engineers, five project managers, five municipal engineers and ten community members. Documentary review and contextual observation supported triangulation. Interview material was organised in Microsoft Excel and analysed thematically through familiarisation, coding, categorisation, theme development and interpretation across stakeholder groups. Participants reported that feasibility studies, site assessments, expert consultation, risk registers, budget adjustments and contingency planning were in use, but their application was inconsistent across the project lifecycle. Financing delays, design and equipment problems, incomplete front-end investigations, environmental and climate pressures, specialist-skill shortages, weak communication, fragmented coordination and political or administrative interference were associated with schedule disruption, cost escalation, rework, quality deficiencies and unreliable services. Community participation was particularly limited during early risk identification, reducing access to local knowledge about service patterns, access constraints and social concerns. The findings show that water-infrastructure risk management is most effective when treated as a continuous governance system rather than a one-time compliance exercise. Stage-gated review, explicit risk ownership, risk-based contingency, community risk intelligence, early-warning indicators and operational resilience measures can connect project control with sustainable service outcomes. The single-case, cross-sectional design limits statistical generalisation, but the study offers transferable management lessons for urban water projects in comparable resource-dependent settings.
Keywords
water infrastructure; risk governance; climate resilience; stakeholder participation; project performance; Zambia
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Chapman, C. and Ward, S. (2011) How to manage project opportunity and risk: Why uncertainty management can be a much better approach than risk management. 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014) ‘What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview’, Project Management Journal, 45(2), pp. 6–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hillson, D. (2009) Managing risk in projects. Farnham: Gower Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO 31000:2018 risk management—Guidelines. 2nd edn. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Available at: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html (Accessed: 16 August 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kerzner, H. (2017) Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. 12th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mugabi, J. and Kennedy-Walker, R. (2022) ‘How Zambia’s inefficient commercial water utilities are slowing down progress in service coverage and what to do about it’, World Bank Blogs, 16 February. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/water/how-zambias-inefficient-commercial-water-utilities-are-slowing-down-progress-service-coverage (Accessed: 16 August 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. National Assembly of Zambia (2025) ‘Water supply interventions on the Copperbelt Province’, Ministerial statement, 22 July. Available at: https://www.parliament.gov.zm/node/12528 (Accessed: 16 August 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Project Management Institute (2021) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 7th edn. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2019) Research methods for business students. 8th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968) General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. World Bank (2020) ‘Water, sanitation and hygiene: Essential for well-being’, Atlas of Sustainable Development Goals 2020. Available at: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdgatlas/archive/2020/goal-6-clean-water-and-sanitation/ (Accessed: 16 August 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. World Bank (2025) Zambia water supply and sanitation services in growth centers program: Program appraisal document. Report No. PADHP00163. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099032625135526224 (Accessed: 16 August 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Yin, R.K. (2018) Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
- Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
- Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
- Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
- The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark