Enhancing Student Learning Through International Academic Collaboration: Evidence from A Cross-Border Teaching Programme

This study looks at how international academic collaboration affects students' experiences as they learn in a brief (short-term) cross-border teaching program. The methodology was a convergent mixed-methods approach that used both quantitative surveys and qualitative open-ended comments from 47 Indonesian students who had attended a collaborative teaching session led by Malaysian instructors. Student participants responded positively to the program, giving it high marks for clarity of instruction, increased knowledge acquisition, instructor engagement, relevant content, and overall satisfaction. A regression model found that two variables, specifically, the educational materials used and the rate of delivery of those materials, accounted for all the variation in students' satisfaction levels. This indicates that the use of well-organised, clearly defined educational resources, as well as an instructional pace that is reasonable for learners to follow, will be most beneficial for enhancing student satisfaction in cross-border teaching situations. The qualitative data also indicated that students value having their questions answered through clear explanations, engaging in interactive dialogue in class, and exposure to international academia. Challenges associated with this experience included language differences, a rapid instructional pace, and insufficient time to present the material. This research adds to the existing body of literature on experiential learning, quality of instruction and "internationalisation at home" by demonstrating that, when properly adapted, short-term cross-border teaching programs can lead to meaningful experiences for students.

Education

1. Artino Jr, A. R., Chen, H. C., Santen, S. A., Simons, R. J., Christner, J. G., & Teherani, A. (2025). Overreliance on student satisfaction surveys in medical education: A call for reform in evaluation and accreditation practices. Academic Medicine, 101(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/acamed/wvaf002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baizhanova, A., Mikhieieva, O., Tleshova, Z., & Wolff, C. (2022). English language communication in Agile cross-border projects: Implications on virtual learning settings. 2022 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/e-tems53558.2022.9944473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: Student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Blackmore, K. L., Pettigrove, M., Johns-Boast, L., Compston, P., Thompson, L., Quinn, D., & Lonie, A. (2012). Tales from inside the blender — Five models of collaboration. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012, H3A-12-H3A-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/tale.2012.6360343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brandt, C., Mejía, E., & Schorr, B. (2025). Introduction. World Sustainability Series, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97837-1_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chavan, M. (2009). The efficacy of web-based teaching in experiential learning. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 1(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v01i01/40285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cruz, N. I., & Whatley, M. (2024). Domestic study away in higher education: A systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 95(5), 1099-1130. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241279296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dantic, M. J. (2024). The intersection of internationalization and sustainable development goals in higher education. Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, 307-340. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6849-7.ch012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deng, S. (2021). Comparing students’ engagement in classroom education between China and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Deng, S. (2021). Comparing students’ engagement in classroom education between China and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Devereux, T., & Glenn, A. (2022). Transformational learning through shifting global perspectives. Journal of International Students, 12(S3), 96-115. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12is3.4642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Doo, M. Y., & Kim, J. (2024). The relationship between learning engagement and learning outcomes in online learning in higher education: A meta-analysis study. Distance Education, 45(1), 60-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2303484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hans, E., & Hans, A. (2026). Strategic leadership for international collaboration in higher education. (2026). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-5956-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Harrison, M. G., King, R. B., & Wang, H. (2023). Satisfied teachers are good teachers: The association between teacher job satisfaction and instructional quality. British Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 476-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3851 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hutchison, C. B., & Bailey, L. M. (2006). Cross-cultural perceptions of assessment of selected international science teachers in American high schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 657-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9028-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jakubakynov, B., Tolegenuly, N., Naribai, R., Nurzhanova, Z., Shcherban, T., & Nebelenchuk, I. (2024). Innovative technologies in higher education: Developing international cooperation in professional training. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2339309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Johannsen, T., & Meyer, H. (2023). Improving Teaching Quality In Higher Education: A Practitioner's Guide To Using Formative Teaching Analysis Poll. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/8REM-2V61 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kaur, S., Singh, G., & Garg, A. (2020). Evaluating the relationship between the course experience questionnaire and student satisfaction: A case from India. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kayyali, M. (Ed.). (2025). International Academic Transformations and CrossBorder Collaborations. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. ISBN: 9798337305080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Khan, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2016). Analysing the impact of poor teaching on student performance. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE 2016). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kikutadze, V., & Lekishvili, T. (2024). Digitalization and international collaborations in higher education: Fostering a global academic community (the case of Georgia). In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Leggett, N. (2020). A fish out of water: Developing intercultural understanding of students in higher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lei, H., Chen, C., & Luo, L. (2024). The examination of the relationship between learning motivation and learning effectiveness: A mediation model of learning engagement. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lu, M.-Y., Miller, M. T., & Newman, R. E. (2013). The global scholar: Challenges and opportunities of working with transnational faculty in higher education. In Handbook of research on transnational higher education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lukman, H. S., Setiani, A., & Muhassanah, N. (2020). Structural equation modelling of teaching quality on students’ satisfaction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Martinez-Mier, E. A., Soto-Rojas, A. E., Stelzner, S. M., & Yoder, K. M. (2011). An international, multidisciplinary, service-learning program: An option in the dental school curriculum. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mattick, L. J., Lott, B. E., Baum, C. E., & Soliman, A. S. (2021). Grit as a key factor in the ability of students to achieve productive global field research. Journal of Cancer Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Msomphora, M. R. (2025). Bridging borders: Global insights and challenges in internationalising higher education using a decade-long case study. International Journal of Educational Research Open. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Natarajan, R. (2012). An agenda for future directions for enhancing international collaboration among faculty, students, curricular, and laboratory development. ASEE International Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nguyen, H., Tharapos, M., O’Connell, B. T., Yap, S. T. L., & Chu, T. (2025). Developing cross-cultural capabilities in foreign accounting educators: The role of cultural intelligence. Accounting Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2566734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nguyen, L. T., Muangsanam, P., & Tuamsuk, K. (2025). Exploring internationalisation in higher education: A systematic review of global collaborations. Globalisation, Societies and Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nguyen-Viet, B., & Nguyen-Viet, B. (2023). Enhancing satisfaction among Vietnamese students through gamification: The mediating role of engagement and learning effectiveness. Cogent Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nie, H., & Tang, K. (2025). Competitive polling to enhance engagement and learning outcomes in a mechanical engineering classroom. 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--56129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Olortegui Alcalde, L. M., Albarran Taype, R., & Pachas Fuentes, M. O. (2025). Unlocking academic success through student satisfaction: The role of motivation, confidence, and psychological capital. IBIMA Business Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Owusu-Agyeman, Y., & Amoakohene, G. (2020). Transnational education delivery in Ghana: Examining the benefits, challenges and future prospects. Policy Reviews in Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Pfotenhauer, S. M., Jacobs, J. S., Pertuze, J. A., Newman, D., & Roos, D. T. (2013). Seeding change through international university partnerships: The MIT-Portugal program as a driver of internationalization, networking, and innovation. Higher Education Policy, 26(2), 217–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Shahbazi, F., & Villa López, F. H. (2024). Enhancing student engagement and deep learning through innovative learning strategies in engineering education: Point-based gaming (PBG) framework. In SEFI 2024 Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Smimou, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). On the relationship between students’ perceptions of teaching quality, methods of assessment, and satisfaction. Journal of Education for Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2013). Maximizing the benefits of international education collaborations: Managing interaction processes. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(3), 245–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Stegniy, V. N. (2013). Quality of teaching assessed by university students. World Applied Sciences Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Szabó, L., Zsolnai, A., & Fehérvári, A. (2024). The relationship between student engagement and dropout risk in early adolescence. International Journal of Educational Research Open. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tingoy, O., & Gulluoglu, S. S. (2012). Effects of culture on distance learning in higher education in the light of digital divide and multicultural: Curriculum and design strategies. In PCI 2012 Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tippins, D. J., Hammond, L., & Hutchison, C. B. (2006). International teachers negotiating 21st century science classrooms: A question of hybridized identities and pedagogical imaginaries. Cultural Studies of Science Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wickline, V., Wiese, D. L., & Aggarwal, P. (2024). Increasing intercultural competence among psychology students using experiential learning activities with international student partners. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhang, X., Admiraal, W., Saab, N., & Liu, Y. (2025). Exploring teaching quality: The role of school working conditions, principal leadership, and teacher characteristics. Educational Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zhiqiao, H., Wenyuan, J., & Duan, N. (2025). Ineffective methods lead to wasted effort: Learning strategies are more important than student engagement in predicting academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zhu, M., Yao, X., & Abu Talib, M. B. (2024). Fostering learning engagement: The impact of different interpersonal relationships from the perspective of positive youth development. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhuang, J. (2023). Boosting self-motivation in English language learning: The role of learning methods and self-efficacy. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Employee Training Efficacy in Banking Sector
• Multidimensional Predictors of University Students’ Examination Performance: A Quantitative Analysis of Psychological, Environmental, And Skill-Based Factors
• Digital Learning Innovation: Evaluating the Effectiveness of MOOC and Politicbox in Enhancing Students Understanding
• An Investigation of Group Work through Mcclelland’s Theory
• The Impact of a Practical Flipped Process-Genre Writing Model on Moroccan EFL High School Students’ Writing Performance