Indonesia's Strategic Autonomy in the China–Indonesia Electric Vehicle Cooperation: Balancing National Interest, Energy Transition, and Great Power Rivalry

Authors

Asep Setiawan

Doctor Programme in Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta (Tangerang Selatan Banten Indonesia)

Hamka

Political Science Programme, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta (Tangerang Selatan Banten Indonesia)

Latifah

Public Administration Programme, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung (Tangerang Selatan Banten Indonesia)

Indah Eko Priyanto

Political Science Programme, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta (Tangerang Selatan Banten Indonesia)

Danu Prasetyo

Master’s Programme in Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta (Tangerang Selatan Banten Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800641

Subject Category: Political Science

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 9575-9589

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-30

Accepted: 2026-09-04

Published: 2026-09-15

Abstract

Indonesia occupies an exceptional geopolitical position in the global electric vehicle transition: it holds the world's largest nickel reserves, commands Southeast Asia's most populous consumer market, and pursues an officially "free and active" (bebas dan aktif) foreign policy doctrine that resists formal alignment with any great power. The emergence of China as the dominant partner in Indonesia's EV ecosystem—through investment by CATL, Tsingshan, BYD, and Wuling—challenges the practical operationalization of this non-alignment principle. This article examines Indonesia's strategic autonomy in managing its EV cooperation with China, interrogating whether Jakarta's resource nationalism and economic diplomacy tools are sufficient to maintain meaningful agency within an asymmetrically structured partnership. Drawing on middle power theory, the strategic autonomy framework, and two-level game theory, and employing a qualitative single-country case study with comparative reference to Malaysia, the article finds that Indonesia's strategic autonomy in the China–Indonesia EV cooperation framework is real but constrained. Jakarta has successfully used nickel down streaming to attract transformative Chinese investment and accelerate EV industrial development; however, the concentration of Chinese capital, technology, and market offtake across the supply chain creates structural vulnerabilities that formal non-alignment rhetoric cannot resolve. The article introduces the concept of "instrumental multilateralism" as an original theoretical contribution and develops policy recommendations for an EV strategic autonomy doctrine combining technology transfer conditionality, domestic innovation investment, multilateral partner engagement, and transparent investment governance.

Keywords

strategic autonomy; Indonesia; China; electric vehicles; nickel down streaming; middle power; hedging; Belt and Road Initiative

Downloads

References

1. Adzhani, I. A., Pramono, B., Santoso, M., Wirayat, M. Y. F., Okdinawati, L., & Belgiawan, P. F. (2025). Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in Indonesia: Insights from Consumer Preferences and Stakeholder Perspectives. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum, 334–350. https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.22067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anwar, D. F. (2022). Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region. The Pacific Review, 36(2), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beeson, M., & Lee, W. (2015). The Middle Power Moment: A New Basis for Cooperation between Indonesia and Australia? In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (pp. 224–243). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397416_11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Budiono, B., & Virgianita, A. (2024). Indonesia’s Movement to Become the Main Player in The Electric Vehicle (EV) Market in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Engineering Social and Health, 3(4), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i4.304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Burger, M. (2026). Downstream Diversification in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia (pp. 173–203). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06139-3_10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Christwan, C., & Kusnowibowo, A. S. (2024). Legal Certainty of Indonesia’s Nickel Downstream Policy Due to the European Union’s Lawsuit at the WTO. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(11), 2992–3010. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i11.1513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Darwis, D., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Indonesia’s Strategic Diplomacy and BRICS Membership: Opportunities and Risks in a Multipolar Global Order. Global South Review, 7(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.106796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fan, T. Y., & Yuliatiningtyas, S. (2025). Comprehensive Review on the Current Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of the China’s New Energy Industry in Indonesia. In Atlantis highlights in social sciences, education and humanities/Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (pp. 614–624). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-918-6_38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fathoni, F., Kesidou, E., Rifansha, M. M., & Tiftazani, A. (2025). Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation in electric vehicle diffusion: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management, 389, 126021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gugat, R. M. D., Nugroho, A., & Fadhil, D. N. (2025). Legal Regulation of Electric Vehicles in Indonesia: Challenges and Directions of National Policy. Ipso Jure, 2(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.62872/kcmcf990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hapsari, G. D., Akmaluddin, G., Waode, D. H., & Ramadhani, R. (2026). Indonesia’s Economic Diplomacy Strategy In Navigating Us-China Competition In The Indo-Pacific Region: Recommendations For Policy Makers. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 9(2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v9i2.7576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Humayro, A., & Virgianita, A. (2024). Trends and Implementation of Electric Vehicle Ecosystem in Indonesia: A Literature Study. Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS), 2(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20956/hjsis.v2i2.34618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ismail, A. (2021). Hyundai Investment On Electric Vehicles In Indonesia. Intermestic Journal of International Studies, 5(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic/v5n2.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jason, F., Shahrullah, R. S., & Syarief, E. (2024). Implikasi Putusan World Trade Organization terhadap Larangan Ekspor Nikel Indonesia oleh Uni Eropa. JURNAL SUPREMASI, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.3528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Juned, M., & Saripudin, M. H. (2025). Dancing With Giants: Indonesia And Its Inclusive Approach In The Indo-Pacific After Brics Acceptance. JANUS NET E-Journal of International Relation, 16. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.dt0525.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Karim, M. F. (2018). Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: the cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal Of International Affairs, 72(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2018.1443428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Konewka, T., Bednarz, J., & Czuba, T. (2021). Building a Competitive Advantage for Indonesia in the Development of the Regional EV Battery Chain. Energies, 14(21), 7332. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Korinek, J., & De, P. (2023). Local content policies in the mining sector (pp. 48–86). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003415794-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liu, H., & Lim, G. (2018). The Political Economy of a Rising China in Southeast Asia: Malaysia’s Response to the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(116), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1511393 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Liu, H., & Lim, G. (2022). When the state goes transnational: The political economy of China’s engagement with Indonesia. Competition & Change, 27(2), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294221103069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Maghfioh, M. F. N., Pandyaswargo, A. H., & Onoda, H. (2021). Current Readiness Status of Electric Vehicles in Indonesia: Multistakeholder Perceptions. Sustainability, 13(23), 13177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mahaseth, H., & Zainab, F. (2025). Indonesia’s Strategic Use Of Asean In Balancing Regional And Global Power Dynamics. JANUS NET E-Journal of International Relation, 16. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.dt0525.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Maulida, S. P., & Aji, T. S. (2025). Evaluating Indonesia’s Economic Adaptation to China’s Growth and Tariff Policies through VECM Estimation. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(11), 5665–5684. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i11.473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mernissi, Z., Risnain, Muh., & Pitaloka, D. (2024). Analysis Of The World Trade Organization Panel Decision Between Indonesia And The European Union In Case Number Ds592 Of 2022 Concerning Restrictions On Exports Of Low-Grade Nickel Ore. Mataram Journal of International Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/majil.v1i2.4221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nandyatama, R. W., Ardhani, I., & Alvian, R. A. (2025). Indonesia’s Middle Power Diplomacy during COVID-19 (pp. 180–191). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003508526-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nasution, M. H., & Dermawan, W. (2026). Indonesia’s Hedging Strategy in The US–China Rivalry in The Indo-Pacific. Global Political Studies Journal, 9(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.34010/gpsjournal.v9i2.19612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nuarta, I. N., & Sukedi, M. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pengaturan Penggunaan Kendaraan Listrik Dalam Penguatan Ketahanan Energi Nasional. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 5(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.5.2.10413.145-154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nugraha, A., Madu, L., & Mulyanto, I. H. (2025). Bridge Builder and a Voice of the Global South or a Risky Alignment? Role Conceptions of Indonesia’s BRICS Membership. RSF Conference Series Business Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v5i2.983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nugraha, U., & Hermawan, M. S. (2024). The Prospect and Challenge of Energy Transition Through Electric Vehicle Development in Indonesia. In Advances in business information systems and analytics book series (pp. 375–400). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3140-8.ch018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Oehler-Şincai, I. M. (2024). The Second-Generation Asian Tigers: Specific Policies To Stimulate Trade In Environmental Goods. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pambudhi, N. A., Sundari, S. W., & Suwito, S. (2024). Indonesia Diplomacy Strategy Towards China in National Economic Resilience and Security Perspective. Jurnal Pertahanan Media Informasi Tentang Kajian Dan Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity Nasionalism Dan Integrity, 10(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v10i3.19590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pramono, A. H., Fuad, H. A. H., Haryanto, B., Indrawan, M., Khasanah, N., Manessa, M. D. M., Pratiwi, K., Sari, D. A., Siregar, R., Supriatna, J., Winarni, N. L., Gallagher, K. P., Ray, R., & Simmons, B. A. (2021). Mitigating social-ecological risks from the surge in China’s overseas investment: an Indonesian profile. Discover Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00069-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Putra, F. A. A., Akbar, M., & Sumarman, M. I. A. (2025). Indonesia’s Membership in BRICS: From Economic Growth Opportunities to Geopolitical Challenges. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 13(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v13i2.26703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Putten, F. van der, & Petkova, M. (2025). The Geopolitical Relevance of the BRI (pp. 197–215). https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727853_ch08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Radhica, D. D. (2023). Proteksionisme Nikel Indonesia dalam Perdagangan Dunia. Cendekia Niaga, 7(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.52391/jcn.v7i1.821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rahmawati, N. D., & Swara, E. (2025). Indonesia’s Nickel Export Ban: Between Industrial Downstreaming and International Trade Disputes. Fortiori Law Journal, 5(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.47200/flj.v5i01.3051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rivota, D. R., & Wardhana, A. R. (2026). Navigating the Complexities of Indonesia’s Journey to Develop a Downstream Nickel Industry (pp. 251–280). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06139-3_13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schneider, F. (2021). Global Perspectives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727853 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Setiawan, A. (2025). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy Trajectory Under President Prabowo Subianto: Balancing Assertiveness and Pragmatism in an Evolving Global Order. COMSERVA Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v5i4.2708 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Teo, S. (2022). Middle powers amid Sino-U.S. rivalry: assessing the ‘good regional citizenship’ of Australia and Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 35(6), 1135–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2075444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tritto, A. (2025). Statism and state activism in response to China’s belt and Road Initiative: Indonesia and Malaysia’s approaches to developing the EV sector. Competition & Change, 30(1), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294241311417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Utamawati, H., & Yusuf, A. (2026). How Indonesia’s ban on raw nickel exports provides lessons for fiscal and economic policy in the low-carbon transition. In London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/researchonline.lse.ac.uk.00137796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wicaksana, I. G. W., & Karim, M. F. (2023). Approaches to Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: Area Studies, FPA Theory, and Global IR. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v10i2.9059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wnukowski, D. (2015). Balancing ASEAN, the U.S. and China: Indonesia’s Bebas-aktif Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. ˜The œPolish Quarterly of International Affairs, 24(4), 115–137. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-eee47dd5-3909-4aba-9542-bbcb1fd9e96d [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yadav, A. S. (2025). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy under Prabowo: A Shift Toward Strategic Assertiveness. Verity Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional (International Relations Journal), 17(33), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.19166/verity.v17i33.9507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles