Foreign Direct Investment and Employment Generation in Nigeria: Evidence from ARDL Approach

Authors

Dr. Uwaifo Emmanuel Chukwuekwu

Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Delta, Agbor, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800668

Subject Category: monetary economics

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 9912-9920

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-26

Accepted: 2026-08-31

Published: 2026-09-15

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and employment in Nigeria over the period 1990–2025. The analysis is motivated by the expectation that FDI can expand productive capacity, introduce technology and managerial expertise, stimulate domestic business activity and create employment, while recognising that these effects depend on the sectoral and technological composition of investment. Annual time-series data were analysed using descriptive statistics, the Augmented Dickey–Fuller unit-root test, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) framework, the ARDL bounds procedure, an error-correction model and post-estimation diagnostic and stability tests. Employment is specified as the dependent variable, while FDI, gross domestic product (GDP), gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), inflation and trade openness are explanatory variables. The estimated ARDL model indicates a positive and statistically significant short-run coefficient for FDI. The estimated long-run FDI coefficient is also positive but statistically insignificant at the 5 percent level. GDP is positive but only marginally significant at the 10 percent level; GFCF is negative and statistically significant; inflation is statistically insignificant; and trade openness is positive and significant in the reported long-run equation. The coefficient for error correction is a negative number which also a significant value, i. e. the speed of adjustments is at approx. one quarter a year. But, at the present level of the 5%, the bound- test value (2.820191) is in the range that the critical bounds of the upper and lower levels. So there is little support provided to cointegration evidence by the data. The diagnostic test further reveals that there is presence of heteroskedasticity, and residuals are not normally distributed, and there is a chance of a functional form or specification issue in these econometric models. First, the results obtained from stability test in the source paper showed that the coefficients are stable. Taking into account all these pieces that the conclusion that must drawn from the study is only that the employment gains in the short-run are correlated with FDI. But, one cannot conclude from the findings that the long-run effect is statistically significant or that is an established causal relationship. So, the measures should center on attracting investments with emphasis on providing jobs, developing links with local suppliers/domestic firms and upgrading, investment in infrastructure, the development of workers' skills and creation of macroeconomic stability.

Keywords

Foreign direct investment; Employment; Nigeria; ARDL; Economic growth; Capital formation; Trade openness.

Downloads

References

1. Aderemi, T. A., Omitogun, O., & Osisanwo, B. G. (2022). Effect of FDI inflows on employment generation in selected ECOWAS countries: Heterogeneous panel analysis. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 13(1), 241–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J.-W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00033-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Central Bank of Nigeria. (Various years). Statistical Bulletin. Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Coniglio, N. D., Prota, F., & Seric, A. (2015). Foreign direct investment, employment and wages in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of International Development, 27(7), 1243–1266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. ILO (2026). Foreign Direct Investment, Global Value Chains and Labour Markets. ILO Working Paper No. 160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Inekwe, J. N. (2014). FDI, employment and economic growth in Nigeria. African Development Review, 25(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lakemann, T., Lay, J., Schnars, R., & Tafese, T. (2025). Greenfield FDI and job creation in Africa. Review of World Economics, 161, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-024-00575-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Madueke, C. M., Ozoh, J. N., Nkechi, O. I., Nwokoye, M. O., & Obi, C. I. (2026). Foreign direct investment and youth unemployment in Nigeria: Reassessing the employment transmission mechanism. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 26(3), 168–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2026/v26i32204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mkombea, D., Tufa, A. H., Alene, A. D., Mandab, J., Feleke, S., Abdoulaye, T., & Manyong, V. (2021). The effects of foreign direct investment on youth unemployment in the Southern African Development Community. Development Southern Africa, 38(6), 863–878. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Bureau of Statistics. (Various years). Nigerian statistical publications. Abuja: National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ngukwarai, I. D., Yilson, E. E., Luka, L., & Lopwus, D. M. (2024). Foreign direct investment and employment generation in Nigeria. ADSU International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Management, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Obetta, U. D., Uzonwanne, C., Metu, A., & Eze, E. A. (2023). Foreign direct investment and employment in Nigeria. Journal of Economic Studies, 20(1), 253–266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. OECD (2025). OECD Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment (Fifth Edition). OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Okoli, K. C., & Okeke, C. T. (2024). Assessing the impact of foreign direct investment on unemployment rate in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(4), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i41278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Osabohien, R., Awolola, O. D., Matthew, O. M., Itua, O. Q., & Elomien, E. (2020). Foreign direct investment inflow and employment in Nigeria. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1), 77–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2), 334–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1956.tb00434.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Bank. (Various years). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles