Determinants and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Public Sector Governance: A Systematic Review

Governments continue to invest heavily in Artificial Intelligence, yet uptake across public sector organisations remains uneven and often stalls well short of policy targets. This review examines why, drawing on 68 empirical studies published between January 2020 and December 2025 and screened under PRISMA 2020. An integrated Technology-Organisation-Environment-Individual (TOE-I) framework, combining TOE with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), was used to organise the determinants and challenges reported across this body of work. Data quality and availability, leadership commitment, and trust in AI systems emerged as the most consistently cited determinants, alongside system compatibility, digital literacy, and interoperability. On the challenges side, organisational barriers dominate the corpus, ahead of technological, individual, and environmental barriers with legacy system integration, bureaucratic inertia, algorithmic bias, cultural resistance, and regulatory uncertainty recurring across contexts. Read together, these patterns suggest that AI adoption in government is less a technology problem than an organisational and human one: the tools exist, but the institutional conditions to use them well often do not. The TOE-I structure developed here gives policymakers and public sector managers a shared vocabulary for diagnosing where their own agencies stand and where intervention would matter most.

Artificial Intelligence Adoption; Public Sector Governance; Technology-Organisation-Environment Framework; Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

1. Andersson, P. E., Arbin, K., & Rosenqvist, C. (2025). Assessing the value of artificial intelligence (AI) in governmental public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 25(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-05-2024-0057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. DePietro, R., Wiarda, E., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. In L. G. Tornatzky & M. Fleischer (Eds.), The processes of technological innovation (pp. 151–175). Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2759/346720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Commission. (2023). AI adoption in European public administrations: Patterns and policies. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gesk, T. S., & Leyer, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), Article 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Horani, O. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Yaseen, H., Hmoud, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2023). The critical determinants impacting artificial intelligence adoption at the organizational level. Information Development, 41(3), 1055–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231166889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hržica, R., Debelak, K., & Pevcin, P. (2025). A dual-level model of AI readiness in the public sector: Merging organizational and individual factors using TOE and UTAUT. Systems, 13(8), Article 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080705 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., & Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), Article 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Klievink, B., Romijn, B. J., Cunningham, S., & de Bruijn, H. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9686-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kumar, R., Singh, A., Kassar, A. S. A., Humaida, M. I., Joshi, S., & Sharma, M. (2025). Adoption challenges to artificial intelligence literacy in public healthcare: An evidence-based study in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1558772. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lartey, S. O., Afful-Dadzie, E., & Afful-Dadzie, A. (2025). Knowledge, attitudes, and readiness towards artificial intelligence in government services: A developing country perspective. Data & Policy, 8, Article e10049. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2025.10049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Liang, Y., Wang, W., Dong, K., Zhang, G., & Qi, G. (2021). Adoption of mobile government cloud from the perspective of public sector. Mobile Information Systems, 2021, Article 8884594. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8884594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit. (2021). Malaysia Digital Economy Blueprint (MyDIGITAL). Prime Minister’s Department of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Maragno, G., Tangi, L., Gastaldi, L., & Benedetti, M. (2023). Exploring the factors, affordances and constraints outlining the implementation of artificial intelligence in public sector organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 73, Article 102686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mikalef, P., Lemmer, K., Schaefer, C., Ylinen, M., Fjørtoft, S. O., Torvatn, H. Y., Gupta, M., & Niehaves, B. (2022). Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies: A study of determinants for European municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), Article 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mikalef, P., Lemmer, K., Schaefer, C., Ylinen, M., Fjørtoft, S. O., Torvatn, H. Y., Gupta, M., & Niehaves, B. (2023). Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), Article 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. (2021). National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021–2025. Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., & Steiner, R. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: A comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Prime Minister’s Office of Malaysia. (n.d.). The Malaysian Madani framework. Retrieved July 28, 2026, from https://malaysiamadani.gov.my/ekonomi-madani/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Tangi, L., & Lerusse, A. (2025). Understanding the adoption of artificial intelligence in local government decision-making: The influence of institutional pressures and managerial perceptions. Public Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024). Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Selten, F., Robeer, M., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023). ‘Just like I thought’: Street-level bureaucrats trust AI recommendations if they confirm their professional judgment. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. van Noordt, C., & Tangi, L. (2023). The dynamics of AI capability and its influence on public value creation of AI within public administration. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, Y.-S., & Shih, Y.-W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Bank. (2021). GovTech maturity index: The state of public sector digital transformation. The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition