Understanding Patterns of Gender-Based Violence: Victim–Perpetrator Dynamics within a Social-Ecological Framework in Sarawak
Authors
Faculty of Economics and Business, University Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
Faculty of Economics and Business, University Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
Emergency and Trauma Department, Sarawak General Hospital (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000420
Subject Category: Sociology
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 5119-5130
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-14
Accepted: 2025-10-19
Published: 2025-11-13
Abstract
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a pervasive issue that manifests in various forms that are often influenced by the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator. While intimate partner violence (IPV) is widely recognized, abuse by other family members, such as parents, siblings, or children, also presents serious concerns, particularly within households. Understanding the dynamics between victims and perpetrators is crucial for determining the nature and intensity of violence. This study investigates how the nature of the perpetrator-victim relationship affects the form and severity of GBV, with a focus on cases reported at the One Stop Crisis Center (OSCC) in Sarawak General Hospital. A total of 139 adult victims were surveyed between March 2021 and March 2023 using the World Health Organization's Violence Against Women Instrument (VAWI), which measures psychological, physical, and sexual violence. The analysis revealed that the relationship with the perpetrator significantly influenced the severity and type of violence experienced. Victims of intrafamilial violence were more likely to report experiencing only one form of abuse, whereas those subjected to IPV were more often exposed to multiple forms of violence. Although the demographic factors such as age, marital status, and education level showed some associations with the patterns of abuse, the perpetrator relationship remained the strongest predictor in this study. In fact, these findings highlight the importance of addressing GBV within both intimate and familial contexts. Understanding the dynamics of different relationships can inform more effective prevention strategies and support services that promote safety and resilience for individuals and communities in Sarawak.
Keywords
One Stop Crisis Center (OSCC), Gender-based violence, Sarawak
Downloads
References
1. Mshelia, I. I. H. (2021). Gender based violence and violence against women in Nigeria: A sociological analysis. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 5(8), 674-683. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. United Nation. (20 August, 2025). Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Sardinha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Stöckl, H., Meyer, S. R., & García-Moreno, C. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. The Lancet, 399(10327), 803-813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. World Health Organization (WHO). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. Geneva; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. UN Women. Measuring the Shadow Pandemic: Violence against women during COVID-19. UN Women Data Hub; 2021. https://data.unwomen.org/sites/default/files /documents/Publications/Measuring-shadow-pandemic.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Livings, M. S., Hsiao, V., & Withers, M. (2023). Breaking the cycle of family violence: A critique of family violence interventions. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2544-2559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kadir Shahar, H., Jafri, F., Mohd Zulkefli, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Malaysia and its associated factors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 20(1550), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Domestic Violence Act 1994. (Act 521). (Malaysia) https://lom.agc.gov.my/act-detail.php?type=principal&lang=BI&act=521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Stevković, L. (2022). Victim or abuser: Victimisation by domestic violence as a predictor of violent behaviour of juveniles towards family members. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja, 31(4), 619-638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Tharshini, N. K., & Hassan, Z. (2025). The prevalence of sibling violence among emerging adults in Malaysia. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 17(2), 77-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mota, R. S., Gomes, N. P., Estrela, F. M., Silva, M. A., Santana, J. D. D., Campos, L. M., & Cordeiro, K. C. C. (2018). Prevalence and factors associated with experience of intrafamilial violence by teenagers in school. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 71(3), 1022-1029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Perkins, S. C., Cortina, K. S., Smith-Darden, J. P., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (2012). The mediating role of self-regulation between intrafamilial violence and mental health adjustment in incarcerated male adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(7), 1199-1224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Boonyananth, N., & Swords, L. (2025). A Systematic Review of the Psychosocial Mechanism Underlying the Pathway from Intra-Familial Victimization in Childhood to Intimate Relationship Violence in Adolescence and Adulthood. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Abramsky, T., Watts, C. H., Garcia-Moreno, C., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Ellsberg, M., ... & Heise, L. (2011). What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC public health, 11(1), 109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Peraica, T., Kovačić Petrović, Z., Barić, Ž., Galić, R., & Kozarić-Kovačić, D. (2021). Gender differences among domestic violence help-seekers: socio-demographic characteristics, types and duration of violence, perpetrators, and interventions. Journal of family violence, 36(4), 429-442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rezey, M. L. (2020). Separated women’s risk for intimate partner violence: A multiyear analysis using the national crime victimization survey. Journal of interpersonal violence, 35(5-6), 1055-1080. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Krebs, C., Breiding, M. J., Browne, A., & Warner, T. (2011). The association between different types of intimate partner violence experienced by women. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 487-500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Vatnar, S. K. B., & Bjørkly, S. (2012). Does separation or divorce make any difference? An interactional perspective on intimate partner violence with focus on marital status. Journal of family violence, 27(1), 45-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Spearman, K. J., Hardesty, J. L., & Campbell, J. (2023). Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 79(4), 1225-1246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Wilson, J. K. (2019). Cycle of Violence. The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Rauf, S. H. A., & Ayob, N. (2020). The experience of domestic violence on married person in Malaysia. Psychology and Education Journal, 57(9), 2211-2215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Oon, S. W., Shuib, R., Ali, S. H., Endut, N., Osman, I., Abdullah, S., & Ghani, P. A. (2016). Exploring the coping mechanism of women experiencing intimate partner violence in Malaysia. IJASOS-International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 2(5), 549-553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Nybergh, L., Taft, C., & Krantz, G. (2012). Psychometric properties of the WHO Violence Against Women instrument in a male population-based sample in Sweden. Bmj Open, 2(6), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kidman, R., & Kohler, H. P. (2020). Emerging partner violence among young adolescents in a low-income country: Perpetration, victimization and adversity. PLoS One, 15(3), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. World Health Organization (WHO). Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes and Women’s Responses. Geneva; 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ford, J. D., & Gómez, J. M. (2015). The relationship of psychological trauma and dissociative and posttraumatic stress disorders to nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidality: A review. Journal of trauma & dissociation, 16(3), 232-271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sauber, E. W., & O’Brien, K. M. (2020). Multiple losses: The psychological and economic well-being of survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence, 35(15-16), 3054-3078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Bidin, A., & Mohd Yusoff, J. Z. (2015). Experience of Domestic Abuse among Malaysian Elderly. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23, 107-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Smith, T. J., & McKenna, C. M. (2013). A comparison of logistic regression pseudo R² indices. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 39(2), 17–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Hu, B., Shao, J., & Palta, M. (2006). Pseudo-R² in logistic regression model. Statistica Sinica, 16(3), 847–860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Weitzman, A. (2018). Does increasing women's education reduce their risk of intimate partner violence? Evidence from an education policy reform. Criminology, 56(3), 574-607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Fasasi, M. I. (2020). Personality Trait and Attitude towards Domestic Violence among Currently Married Women in South-West Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(12), 476-480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Klencakova, L. E., Pentaraki, M., & McManus, C. (2023). The impact of intimate partner violence on young women’s educational well-being: A systematic review of literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 1172-1187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Hanafi, W. S. W. M., Ismail, T. A. T., Ghazali, A. K., Sulaiman, Z., & Daud, A. (2022). Factors associated with attitudes towards rejecting intimate partner violence among young adults in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
- Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
- Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
- Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
- Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study