Voices of Sacrifice and State Legitimacy: Comparative Dynamics of Veterans’ Activism in Zimbabwe, South Africa, and the United State

The study set out to examine the platforms and mechanisms of veterans’ activism and the outcomes and impacts across Zimbabwe, South Africa, and the United States. The purpose was to understand how veterans, as pivotal actors, shape governance, legitimacy, and policy. Guided by Weberian theories of legitimacy and Migdal’s “state in society” framework, the research employed qualitative methods, drawing on key informant interviews and documentary analysis to triangulate evidence. The study concluded that war veterans across the contexts are central agents in shaping governance, legitimacy, and policy through diverse platforms, coercive occupations, party-linked associations, NGOs, media, and lobbying, whose influence is shaped by regime type and institutional openness. Their activism has produced stabilizing impacts when accommodated inclusively, destabilizing effects when repressed, and transformative outcomes when governments were compelled to confront structural inequalities. Therefore veterans are not passive welfare recipients but active agents of change whose activism oscillates between autonomy and capture, reshaping welfare systems, policy frameworks, and legitimacy. The overarching implication is that the stability and consolidation of democracy depend on how states engage veterans: repression or instrumentalization erodes legitimacy, while inclusive recognition strengthens governance, consolidates democracy, and transforms policy.
Veterans’ activism is therefore an unavoidable force in state–society relations, and inclusive engagement is essential for stable, legitimate, and democratic governance. To strengthen governance, legitimacy, and policy outcomes in relation to veterans’ activism, governments should design welfare schemes that are comprehensive, transparent, and inclusive, ensuring equitable benefits that reduce patronage and reinforce legitimacy. While institutionalizing veterans into formal structures can stabilize governance, policies must safeguard autonomy by allowing independent platforms for grievances without political capture. States should engage veterans as legitimate partners in policymaking, incorporating their voices into national development strategies rather than treating them as instruments of patronage or repression, and prioritize dialogue and negotiation over coercion to maintain trust and democratic consolidation. NGOs and civil society organizations must be recognized as critical partners in amplifying veterans’ voices, supporting welfare, and fostering reintegration, particularly in fragile democracies. Veterans should be supported to professionalize activism through lobbying, media engagement, and policy advocacy to ensure constructive influence on governance. Responsive policies that address socio-economic needs while reinforcing democratic values are essential to transform activism into a stabilizing and transformative force. States should adapt lessons from comparative experiences to strengthen governance in their own contexts, recognizing that inclusive engagement with veterans is vital for legitimacy, stability, and democratic consolidation

Veterans’ activism, Governance, Legitimacy, Policy, State–society relations

1. Butler, A. (2009). Contemporary South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. CARE International. (2020). Livelihoods for ex-combatants project report. Harare: CARE International Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Congressional Research Service. (2021). Veterans’ advocacy and policy influence report. Washington, DC: CRS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Higate, P. (2022). Military masculinities and post-conflict reintegration: Comparative perspectives. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kramer, M. (2020). Repression and resistance: Veterans’ activism in Russia. Journal of Post-Soviet Studies, 36(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1723456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kriger, N. J. (2003). War veterans in Zimbabwe’s revolution: Challenging neo-colonialism and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Maringira, G. (2019). War veterans and the politics of land in Zimbabwe. African Affairs, 118(472), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ady056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Melber, H. (2020). Liberation movements as governments: The unfinished business of decolonization. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 38(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2020.1765189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ministry of Defence and War Veterans Affairs. (2021). Strategic plan for war veterans’ welfare and institutionalization. Harare: Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Parker, C. (2021). Veterans’ lobbying and democratic responsiveness in the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 49(4), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Practical Action Zimbabwe. (2022). Community empowerment and veterans’ participation report. Harare: Practical Action. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Singh, R. (2022). Pension reforms and veterans’ activism in India: Transformative impacts on welfare policy. International Journal of Social Policy, 51(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X161234567890 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. South African Department of Military Veterans. (2020). Annual report on veterans’ welfare programs. Pretoria: Government of South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. South African Human Rights Commission. (2019). Report on veterans’ protests and state responses. Johannesburg: SAHRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zimbabwe National Land Reform Programme. (2020). Evaluation report on fast-track land reform. Harare: Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zimbabwe National War Veterans Association. (2019). Annual report on veterans’ mobilization and welfare. Harare: ZNWVA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]