Mapping Entrepreneurship Education Research across CNKI and WoS: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis and a CMO Research Agenda

Entrepreneurship education has become an established area of higher education research, but its development across publication corpora remains incompletely understood. This study compares two database-specific corpora: 3,064 English-language articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection and classified in the education category, and 3,649 Chinese-language journal articles from CSSCI sources in the education category and indexed in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. CiteSpace was used to analyze publication trends, keyword co-occurrence networks, clusters, and keyword bursts. Citation evidence was analysed separately because the available CNKI export did not support the same CiteSpace co-citation procedure. WoS cited references were examined through co-citation clustering, whereas the five CNKI articles with the highest platform-specific citation counts were coded descriptively. Both corpora focused on higher education, students, and entrepreneurship education. CNKI output peaked in 2017 and then declined, whereas WoS output continued to increase through 2024. The WoS corpus gave greater prominence to self-efficacy, impact, performance, and model-based analysis. The CNKI corpus emphasized talent cultivation, entrepreneurial competence, and innovation and entrepreneurship. These patterns are consistent with a mechanism and evaluation orientation in WoS and a reform and implementation orientation in CNKI. This interpretation does not establish institutional or policy causation. The study presents a Context-Mechanism-Outcome research agenda for future empirical testing. The findings apply to the retrieved and screened corpora rather than to Chinese or worldwide entrepreneurship education research as a whole.

Entrepreneurship Education; Comparative Bibliometrics; CMO Framework.

1. Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The Relationship between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta–Analytic Review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C. (2014). Orphan drugs and rare diseases: A scientometric review (2000 – 2014). Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs, 2(7), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1517/21678707.2014.920251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Visualization analysis of high-speed railway research based on CiteSpace. Transport Policy, 85, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cheng, Z., Xie, Y., & Wen, H. (2022). Visualization analysis of research on climate innovation on CiteSpace. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1025128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chopra, M., Saini, N., Kumar, S., Varma, A., Mangla, S. K., & Lim, W. M. (2021). Past, present, and future of knowledge management for business sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129592 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dalkin, S. M., Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B., & Lhussier, M. (2015). What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science, 10(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dang, Q., Luo, Z., Ouyang, C., Wang, L., & Xie, M. (2021). Intangible Cultural Heritage in China: A Visual Analysis of Research Hotspots, Frontiers, and Trends Using CiteSpace. SUSTAINABILITY, 13(17), 9865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. De Weger, E., Van Vooren, N. J. E., Wong, G., Dalkin, S., Marchal, B., Drewes, H. W., & Baan, C. A. (2020). What’s in a realist configuration? Deciding which causal configurations to use, how, and why. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920938577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920938577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Do Nguyen, Q., & Nguyen, H. T. (2023). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of entrepreneurial capacity. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Intention: Hysteresis and Persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fayolle, A., Verzat, C., & Wapshott, R. (2016). In quest of legitimacy: The theoretical and methodological foundations of entrepreneurship education research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 34(7), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616649250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Georgescu, M.-A., & Herman, E. (2020). The impact of the family background on students’ entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical analysis. Sustainability, 12(11), 4775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114775 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Han, Y., & Liang, Y. (2023). Scientific Knowledge Map Study of Therapeutic Landscapes and Community Open Spaces: Visual Analysis with CiteSpace. Sustainability, 15(20), 15066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Klarin, A. (2024). How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: Guidelines and contributions of content co‐occurrence or co‐word literature reviews. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13031. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lund, B., & Ma, J. (2021). A review of cluster analysis techniques and their uses in library and information science research: K-means and k-medoids clustering. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 22(3), 161–173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mohamed, N. A., & Ali, A. Y. S. (2021). Entrepreneurship education: Systematic literature review and future research directions. World Journal Of Entrepreneurship Management And Sustainable Development, 17(4), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-07-2020-0084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Muñoz, M. A. C., Devece, C., & Ortiz, M. P. (2024). University-level entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric review using Tree of Science. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 11(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(6), 066133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nowiński, W., Haddoud, M. Y., Lančarič, D., Egerová, D., & Czeglédi, C. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and gender on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in the Visegrad countries. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1365359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5409538&publisher=FZ7200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 25(5), 479–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ratten, V., & Usmanij, P. (2021). Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Robinson, S., Neergaard, H., Tanggaard, L., & Krueger, N. F. (2016). New horizons in entrepreneurship education: From teacher-led to student-centered learning. Education+ Training, 58(7/8), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2016-0048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Su, X., Li, X., & Kang, Y. (2019). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace. Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019840119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Thomas, O. (2023). Entrepreneurship education: Which educational elements influence entrepreneurial intention? Industry and Higher Education, 37(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221121065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wan, N., & Lv, X. (2021). A bibliometric analysis on the landscape of entrepreneurship education in higher education (2001–2020). Entrepreneurship Education, 4(4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-021-00062-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wu, H, Ge, W, & He, J. (2020). The impact of teacher support on the intention to continue learning MOOC courses: A perspective based on S-O-R and TAM. Modern Distance Education, (03). https://doi.org/doi:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20200629.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wu, L., Jiang, S., Wang, X., Yu, L., Wang, Y., & Pan, H. (2022). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of college students: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the moderating role of entrepreneurial competition experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 727826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Xia, T., Shumin, Z., & Yifeng, W. (2016). Status Quo and Outlook of the Studies of Entrepreneurship Education in China: Statistics and Analysis Based on Papers Indexed in CSSCI (2004–2013). Chinese Education & Society, 49(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2016.1218255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zhao, X., Nan, D., Chen, C., Zhang, S., Che, S., & Kim, J. H. (2023). Bibliometric study on environmental, social, and governance research using CiteSpace. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 10, 1087493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1087493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zheng, Y. (2018). The past, present and future of research on Chinese entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric analysis based on CSSCI journal articles. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5), 1255–1276. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.5.025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]