Psychological And Social Determinants Of Spm Mathematics Achievement Among Malaysian Secondary Students: A Comparative Analysis Between Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan And Sekolah Menengah Agama

Authors

Nurulhayah Muhamad

Faculty of Business, Hospitality and Technology, University Islam Melaka (Malaysia)

Maryam Mohd Esa

Faculty of Business, Hospitality and Technology, University Islam Melaka (Malaysia)

Rusyda Yahya

Faculty of Business, Hospitality and Technology, University Islam Melaka (Malaysia)

Norzaimah Zainol

Faculty of Business, Hospitality and Technology, University Islam Melaka (Malaysia)

Nadiah Ishak

Faculty of Business, Hospitality and Technology, University Islam Melaka (Malaysia)

Nazila Ishak

MARA Junior Science College BERA-ATM, Pahang (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000422

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 5144-5157

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-16

Accepted: 2025-10-21

Published: 2025-11-13

Abstract

Persistent underachievement in Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) Mathematics continues to raise concern within Malaysia’s education system, with a significant proportion of students failing to meet expected proficiency levels. This study examines the psychological and social determinants influencing SPM Mathematics achievement among secondary school students in Masjid Tanah, Melaka. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire from 591 respondents (444 SMK and 147 SMA students) and analyzed quantitatively through descriptive and Pearson correlation analyses using SPSS version 27. Four key variables: student interest, mathematics anxiety, motivation, and peer influence were measured to assess their relationships with mathematics proficiency. The results revealed that student interest (r = 0.428–0.642) and motivation (r = 0.321–0.412) showed moderate to strong positive correlations with mathematics achievement, whereas anxiety demonstrated a weak negative correlation (r = −0.10 to −0.14) and peer influence exhibited a weak but significant positive correlation (r = 0.22–0.25). Comparative findings indicated that SMA students displayed stronger positive relationships between interest and motivation with mathematics proficiency than SMK students, reflecting higher academic discipline and consistent study habits. These findings highlight that mathematics achievement at the SPM level is shaped not only by cognitive ability but also by affective and social dimensions of learning. Practically, the study suggests that student-centered, anxiety-reducing instructional strategies should be prioritized in classrooms to enhance motivation and mathematics engagement in line with Malaysia’s education reform and SDG 4 (Quality Education).

Keywords

SPM Mathematics, student motivation, mathematics interest

Downloads

References

1. Abd Karim, A. H., Hajar, M. S. N., & Tunku Ahmad, T. B. (2023). Prevalence of math anxiety among upper secondary students at a private school in suburban Kuala Lumpur. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 13(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol13.1.5.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abu, N. E. B., & Eu, L. K. (2017). Hubungan Antara Sikap, Minat, Pengajaran Guru Dan Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya Terhadap Pencapaian Matematik Tambahan Tingkatan 4. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1-10.Berita Harian. (2023, June 21). SPM 2022: One in four students failed Mathematics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ayub, A. F. M., Yunus, A. S. M., & Mahmud, R. (2018). Pengaruh Guru, Rakan Sebaya dan sokongan keluarga terhadap keterlibatan Matematik dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Menengah: The influence of Teachers support, Students’ Cohesiveness and parental involvement toward Mathematics engagement among Secondary School students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 8(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Berk, L.E. (1997). Child development (4th. ed.). Allyn & Bacon; Boston. https://doi.org/10.37934/sijste.1.1.3948b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gan, S. L., & Hong, K. S. (2022). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in the teaching of mathematics in a Malaysian government secondary school. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 33-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hogue A, Steinberg L. (1995). Homophily of internalized distress in adolescent peer groups. Dev. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. a. Psychol. 31, 897–906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kairi, N. I., Jamaludin, N., & Mohd Ridzuan, N. D. (2024). Competition-based learning in science camp to stimulate upper secondary school students’ motivation in learning STEM. Sains Humanika, 16(2), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v16n2.2137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khoo, N. A., Jamaluddin, N. Y., Osman, S., & Buchori, A. (2024). Exploring the interaction between learning styles and mathematics anxiety among secondary school students: A correlational study in southern Malaysia. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(3), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khoo, S. L., Tan, H. M., & Rahim, N. F. (2023). Exploring the interaction between learning styles and mathematics anxiety among secondary students in southern Malaysia. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 547–563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Laporan Analisis Keputusan Peperiksaan SPM 2022. (2023). Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malaysian Examination Board. (2024). Laporan Analisis Keputusan SPM 2023. Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mantihal, S., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The impact of 21st-century learning on students’ interest in mathematics. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nurhanifah, T., Meilantifa, K., & Kholifah, S. (2024). Meningkatkan minat belajar matematika melalui teknik pembelajaran kooperatif STAD pada materi statistika di kelas X Kuliner 5 SMK Negeri 8 Surabaya. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nursuhaili Baharuddin (2010). Hubungan Antara Kemahiran Sosial dengan Tingkah Laku Sosial dalam Kalangan Kanak-Kanak Prasekolah di Tabika Kemas, Beaufort. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Malaysia Sabah [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OECD. (2024). The Future of Education and Skills: 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Quek, M. L., & Yeo, K. J. (2006). Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya Dengan Pencapaian Matematik Di kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Di Daerah Batu Pahat, johor (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rahim, A., Yusof, F., & Jalil, N. (2024). Student-centered learning and inquiry-based strategies in mathematics education: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Pedagogical Studies, 12(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shamsuddin, H., Zainal, Z., & Nor, A. R. (2024). The role of student interest in enhancing mathematics achievement and engagement. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(2), 44–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rahman, N. A. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2024). The effects of peer interaction towards mathematical understanding during learning activities among primary school students. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 12(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.1.7.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rahmawati, N. N., & Suhartono, S. (2024). Penerapan Metode Tutor Sebaya untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Semantik: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya, 2(4), 64-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Razali, S. N. A. M., Sufahani, S. F., & Arbin, N. (2015). Pencapaian kursus matematik dan statistik di kalangan pelajar UTHM: Faktor mempengaruhi dan teknik pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang lebih diminati. Journal of Techno-Social, 7(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rosly, N. S., & Azuan, A. Z. S. (2024). Empowering secondary school teachers and students with effective mathematics teaching and learning strategies. Jurnal Intelek, 19(2), 33–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JI/article/view/6440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sabri, M. A., Mohamed, N. A., Mohamed, N. H., & Mohamed, N. F. (2025). Relationship between motivation level and mathematics achievement level for Form Four students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 15(1), 12–22. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JPSMM/article/view/10268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and Student Factors and Their Influence on Advanced Mathematics Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 274-286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sharifah Alwiah Alsagoff (1983). Psikologi Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Negara. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shamsuddin, M., Mahlan, S. B., Hamat, M., Alias, F. A., & Ahmad, N. (2024). Kajian Tahap Kebimbangan Dan Minat Pelajar Pra Sains Terhadap Matematik. e Learning@ CS, 7, 70-75.TalentCorp. (2024). Malaysia’s Graduate Employability Report 2024. TalentCorp Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. United Nations. (2024). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4Mantihal, S., & Maat, S. M. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran abad ke-21 (PAK21) terhadap minat murid dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik: Satu tijauan sistematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(1), 82-91.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wong, K. T., & Wong, L. H. (2019). Students’ interest and learning achievement in a technology-enhanced mathematics classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(21), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Woo, P. S., Mohd Rameli, M. R., & Mohd Kosnin, A. (2022). A meta-analysis on the impact of peer instruction on students’ learning. Sains Humanika, 14(3), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v14n3.1943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zakaria, M. I., Abdullah, A. H., Alhassora, N. S. A., Osman, S., & Ismail, N. (2025). The impact of M-learning and problem-based learning teaching methods on students' motivation and academic performance. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 503-518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zebua, E., & Harefa, A. T. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 251-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zubaidah Md Saleh, G., Subramaniam, G., & Nurul Munira Mohd Shariff, N. M. (2024). Mathematics anxiety among architecture students at Polytechnic Sultan Idris Shah: A preliminary study. Semarak International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 39-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles