Audit Committee Performance Gaps and Corporate Governance Risk Mitigation Under China’s New Regulatory Regime: A Conceptual Framework

Against the backdrop of strengthened corporate governance standards and regulatory oversight in China’s capital markets, audit committees play a critical role in supervising financial reporting, internal controls, risk management, and information disclosure. However, a gap often exists between their formal establishment and substantive governance performance. Drawing on agency theory and institutional theory, this study develops a conceptual framework linking audit committee performance gaps to corporate governance risks, risk mitigation mechanisms, and improved governance outcomes under China’s evolving regulatory context. The study identifies key gaps, including insufficient independence, inadequate professional expertise, formalistic operation, limited authority and information access, and weak engagement and accountability. These gaps may weaken monitoring effectiveness, increase information asymmetry and managerial opportunism, and consequently heighten financial reporting, internal control, disclosure, and compliance risks. To address these risks, the study proposes a risk mitigation plan centered on strengthening audit committee independence, professional competence, substantive engagement, authority, information access, and accountability. China’s evolving regulatory regime, characterized by stricter disclosure requirements and stronger enforcement, further supports these governance improvements. The framework therefore connects governance gaps with risk assessment and actionable responses, demonstrating how internal audit committee capabilities and external regulatory pressure can jointly enhance corporate governance effectiveness. The study provides theoretical and policy implications for improving audit committee effectiveness and corporate governance in emerging markets.

audit committee; corporate governance risk; regulatory regime; Agency Theory; Institutional Theory

1. Aguilera, R. V., & Ruiz Castillo, M. (2025). Toward an updated corporate governance framework: Fundamentals, disruptions, and future research. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 28(2), 336-348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Sanasleh, A., Jaffar, N., Saidin, S. F., & Al-Nohood, S. (2025). The Impact of Audit Committee Quality on the Relationship between Integrated Reporting Quality and ESG Performance: Conceptual Paper. International Journal of Academic Reserach in Economics and Management Sciences, 14(1), 1956-1981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Almasria, N. A. (2022). Corporate governance and the quality of audit process: An exploratory analysis considering internal audit, audit committee and board of directors. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(1), 78-99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alrudayni, A. H. S. (2023). The personal characteristics of audit committee financial experts, audit quality and financial reporting quality Victoria University] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Babalola, F. I., Kokogho, E., Odio, P. E., Adeyanju, M. O., & Sikhakhane-Nwokediegwu, Z. (2025). Audit committees and financial reporting quality: A conceptual analysis of governance structures and their impact on transparency. International Journal of Management and Research, 4(1), 89-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bananuka, J., & Nkundabanyanga, S. K. (2023). Audit committee effectiveness, internal audit function, firm-specific attributes and internet financial reporting: a managerial perception-based evidence. Journal of financial reporting and accounting, 21(5), 1100-1123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, M. C., & Mueller, S. M. (2025). External corporate governance and corporate misconduct: a meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 33(4), 832-849. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brogi, M., & Lagasio, V. (2025). Do Corporate Governance Frameworks Affect Sustainability Reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3928-3943. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, H., Zhuang, W., Wang, Z., & Zhou, A. (2024). Administrative audit regulation and the quality of accounting information: Evidence from China securities regulatory commission’s random inspection system. Research in International Business and Finance, 71, 102502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, L., & Ke, L. (2025). Unlocking Corporate Governance: Enhancing the Board of Directors in Chinese State-Owned Holding Companies Under the PRC Company Law 2023. European Business Organization Law Review, 1-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cheng, Z., & Pan, Z. (2025). The resilience revolution: Will new securities laws Be corporate China's pressure test? International Review of Economics & Finance, 104589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Del Sarto, N. (2025). Corporate Governance and ESG Controversies: Navigating Risk‐Taking in Banks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4541-4560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fariha, R., Hossain, M. M., & Ghosh, R. (2022). Board characteristics, audit committee attributes and firm performance: empirical evidence from emerging economy. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(1), 84-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ghafran, C., & O'Sullivan, N. (2013). The governance role of audit committees: reviewing a decade of evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 381-407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hadad, M. D., Agusman, A., Monroe, G. S., Gasbarro, D., & Zumwalt, J. K. (2011). Market discipline, financial crisis and regulatory changes: Evidence from Indonesian banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(6), 1552-1562. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Huang, R. H. (2022). Reputational Sanctions as A Self-regulatory Tool of China’s Stock Exchanges: Recent Developments of the Law and Practice. Securities Regulation Law Journal, 50(4), 32-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jia, Y., & Gao, X. (2025). Audit Committee Member as Lead Independent Director and Oversight Quality. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 44(4), 145-170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jiang, W., & Liu, B. (2025). Registration reform: A game-changer for corporate financial discipline? Finance Research Letters, 108254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Johari, R. J., Rashid, N., & Mohd Kamil, N. (2025). Navigating independence and excellence: how audit committee traits shape earnings quality in top sectors in Malaysia? Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal (APMAJ), 20(1), 85-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Khatib, S. F. (2025). An assessment of methods to deal with endogeneity in corporate governance and reporting research. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(3), 606-630. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Komal, B., Bilal, Ye, C., & Salem, R. (2022). The impact of audit committee effectiveness on firms’ outcomes in China: a systematic review. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(5), 583-599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Krishnamoorthy, G., Bruynseels, L., De Groote, S., Wright, A. M., & Van Peteghem, M. (2023). The accounting financial expertise of the audit committee chair and oversight effectiveness. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 42(1), 75-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kusumawati, Y. T., & Halim, A. (2026). The Role of Competence, Independence, Professional Commitment, and Professional Oversight on Audit Quality and Reputable Public Accounting Firm Model in Indonesia. Inkubis: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 8(2), 1111-1120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mayeputh, N., & Beebeejaun, A. (2026). The Non-Compliance Provisions of Corporate Governance Codes: A Critical Analysis of the Laws of Mauritius and the United Kingdom. Journal of Legal Studies, 37(51), 144-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mohamed Alshawadfy Aladwey, L., & Zehri, F. (2026). Earning management and audit committee effectiveness in GCC: the mediating effect of board gender diversity. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 26(4), 901-925. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Murhaban, M. (2025). The Role of Audit Committees in Enhancing Corporate Governance and Financial Transparency. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(10), 2210-2217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Naz, R., Irshad, K., & Siddiqui, F. (2022). Agency theory and corporate governance: A review of the literature from a developing country perspective. Sage Open, 12(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ng, S. L. (2024). Role effectiveness of audit committees' governance characteristics: impacts on internal and external auditing of listed companies RMIT University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Risi, D., Vigneau, L., Bohn, S., & Wickert, C. (2023). Institutional theory‐based research on corporate social responsibility: Bringing values back in. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 3-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sahin, K., & Mert, K. (2023). Institutional theory in international business studies: the period of period of 1990–2018. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(5), 1957-1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shaw, J. D. (2025). A cautionary tale: On the adoption of self‐determination theory principles for practice. Journal of Management Studies, 62(5), 2125-2134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shi, X., Zhang, Y., Yu, M., & Zhang, L. (2025). Deep learning for enhanced risk management: a novel approach to analyzing financial reports. PeerJ Computer Science, 11, e2661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Singhania, A. K., & Panda, N. M. (2024). Does an effective audit committee influence firm performance?–The moderation role of knowledge intensity. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(4), 764-779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Skachkova, L., Kostenko, E., & Gozalova, A. (2022). Positive agency theory. explaining social and labor relations in the academic sphere. Journal of Economic Regulation, 13(3), 73-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Suluo, H., Raphael, G., & Kapaya, S. (2025). Impact of corporate governance practices on the effectiveness of audit committees in regulatory authorities: evidence from Tanzania. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Velte, P. (2023). Which attributes of audit committees are most beneficial for European companies? Literature review and research recommendations. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14(4), 403-430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wang, H., Wang, L., & Huang, D. (2025). Can corporate social responsibility and corporate governance structure reduce corporate legal risk? Finance Research Letters, 73, 106598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yahaya, O. A. (2026a). Audit committee influence on how board structure impacts earnings management practices in Nigeria. Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(3), 81-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yahaya, O. A. (2026b). Compliance culture as a mediator of internal control quality and financial fraud risk. International Journal of Applied Business and Finance, 14(1), 134-166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yang, T., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Qiao, V., Wang, Z., & Zheng, S. (2021). Highlights of the new PRC securities law. Journal of Investment Compliance, 22(1), 20-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zhang, Q., & Lin, Z. (2025). Development of corporate governance practices and capital market reforms in China. Journal of Comprehensive Business Administration Research, 2(3), 205-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors