Identifying the Dimensions of Housing Policy Effectiveness
Authors
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1015EC0103
Subject Category: Real Estate
Volume/Issue: 10/15 | Page No: 1510-1524
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-02
Accepted: 2026-09-07
Published: 2026-09-20
Abstract
Housing policy is commonly implemented through programmes intended to widen access to affordable housing, yet the success of such programmes is still frequently measured only by the number of housing units delivered. This narrow focus overlooks whether housing outcomes actually meet the needs of the intended beneficiaries. This paper addresses this gap by reviewing housing attributes reported in previous studies and reorganising them into broader dimensions of housing policy achievement. Adopting an archival review approach, the study examined 27 selected housing studies published between 2008 and 2026 covering residential satisfaction, housing affordability, housing preferences, public housing governance, housing management and housing delivery. Relevant housing attributes were extracted from each study, compared for conceptual similarity, and grouped through thematic synthesis according to the housing outcome each attribute represents. The review identified 49 indicators, organised into seven dimensions: affordability, financing, quality, location, neighbourhood, matching and delivery. Each dimension captures a distinct aspect of housing policy achievement, ranging from the financial burden of housing costs and access to financing mechanisms, to physical housing quality, spatial accessibility, neighbourhood liveability, the fit between housing supply and household needs, and the fairness and efficiency of the housing delivery process. The main contribution of this paper lies in translating housing attributes originally developed for studies of residential satisfaction, housing preference, affordability and housing management into a unified set of policy achievement dimensions. These dimensions extend the assessment of housing policy effectiveness beyond physical output indicators to the lived conditions experienced by target households. The findings offer a broader conceptual basis for evaluating government housing programmes and provide a foundation for developing and validating an empirical measurement instrument in future research on housing policy effectiveness.
Keywords
housing policy effectiveness; housing policy achievement; housing attributes; affordable housing
Downloads
References
1. Akinsulire, A. A., Idemudia, C., Okwandu, A. C., & Iwuanyanwu, O. (2024). Economic and social impact of affordable housing policies: A comparative review. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(7), 1433-1448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alencar, A. B., de Oliveira, M. C. F., & Paulovich, F. V. (2012). Seeing beyond reading: A survey on visual text analytics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(6), 476-492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Azmi, N., & Bujang, A. A. (2021). The gap between housing affordability and affordable house: A challenge for policy makers. Planning Malaysia, 19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Besar, J. A., Fauzi, R., & Ghazali, A. S. (2012). Penilaian awal impak perlaksanaan Dasar Perumahan Negara terhadap sektor perumahan di Kuala Lumpur [Preliminary assessment of the impact of the National Housing Policy on the housing sector in Kuala Lumpur]. Geografia, 8(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Che-Ani, A., Tawil, N., Sairi, A., Abdullah, N., Tahir, M., & Surat, M. (2010). Facility management indicators for high-rise residential property in Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 6(4), 255-264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cruzes, D., & Dybå, T. (2011). Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2011.36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hassan, M. M., Ahmad, N., & Hashim, A. H. (2021a). Factors influencing housing purchase decision. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 429-443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hassan, M. M., Ahmad, N., & Hashim, A. H. (2021b). A review on housing affordability in Malaysia: Are we doing fine. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 26, 181-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ibem, E. O., & Azuh, D. E. (2011). Framework for evaluating the sustainability of public housing programmes in developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Development and Environmental Protection, 1(3), 24-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kadir, J. M. A., Subramaniam, G., & Ghazali, I. (2020). Housing affordability among middle-income earners in Selangor, Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(15), 289-293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kuok, K. K., Chiu, P. C., Mersal, M. E., Rahman, M. R., & Said, K. A. M. (2025). Residential satisfaction and living experience in low-cost housing within tropical climates: A case study of Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 40(3), 1173-1188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Labin, A. M. J. E., Che-Ani, A. I., & Kamaruzzaman, S. N. (2014). Affordable housing performance indicators for landed houses in the central region of Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 8(6), 70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Lai, L. X., Wong, P. F., & Yong, F. Y. Y. (2023). Investigating the influence of homebuyers' sociodemographic factors on preferences of sustainable affordable housing. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 27(4), 261-274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Majelan, N. A. (2020). Efficiency of housing delivery system for affordable homeownership in Malaysia: A review of literature. Jurnal Kemanusiaan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Maslow, A., & Lewis, K. J. (1987). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Salenger Incorporated, 14(17), 987-990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mohamed, M. F., Mohammad Yusoff, W. F., Iman Pratama, T. M., & Raman, S. N. (2014). Satisfaction perception of indoor environment of low-cost housing: A case study of Flat Taman Desa Sentosa. E3S Web of Conferences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Muhammad Zamri, N. E. M., Yaacob, M. A., & Mohd Suki, N. (2022). Assessing housing preferences of young civil servants in Malaysia: Do location, financial capability and neighbourhood really matter? International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 15(3), 579-591. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nizam, N., Roosli, R., & Hanafi, M. (2025). Factors that influencing purchase intention and decision of homebuyers towards affordable housing in Malaysia. Progress in Energy and Environment, 31, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.37934/progee.31.2.165184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Olanrewaju, A., Chai, K. S., Sanmargaraja, S., Nizamani, Z., & Khor, S. C. (2026). Examining surplus and shortage in occupied housing preference in Malaysia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 19(1), 285-308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ondola, S. O., Odundo, P., & Rambo, C. M. (2013). Effectiveness of housing policies and their implementation strategies in the provision of low-cost housing to the urban poor in Kisumu City, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(4), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Riazi, M., & Emami, A. (2018). Residential satisfaction in affordable housing: A mixed method study. Cities, 82, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sairi, N. A. M., Burhan, B., & Safian, E. E. M. (2022). Identifying housing submarkets in Johor Bahru and Kulai, Malaysia: A data-driven method. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 30(2), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Salleh, A. G. (2008). Neighbourhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32(4), 485-493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Salleh, N. A., Yusof, N. A., Johari, N., & Ahmad, N. A. (2018). Affordability measurement among public housing tenants in Ipoh, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 829-845. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. She, T. J., Aini, A. M., & Zyed, Z. A. S. (2022). Performance measurement practices in property management of public housing Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Teck-Hong, T. (2012). Housing satisfaction in medium- and high-cost housing: The case of Greater Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 36(1), 108-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Van Niekerk, B. (2018). Housing as urbanism: A policy to discourage urban sprawl and provide well-located and affordable housing in South Africa. Town and Regional Planning, 73, 68-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Voon, Z.-C., Hooy, C.-W., & Puah, C.-H. (2020). An augmented measurement of the housing affordability cycles in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 57(1), 133-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Yaaco, M. A., Hammad Ahmad Khan, H., & Mohd Noor, N. H. (2025). The determinants of renting intention and renting satisfaction: The role of housing knowledge, housing challenges, and housing policy. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 18(4), 966-986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Yan, J., Haffner, M., & Elsinga, M. (2022). Effective public rental housing governance: Tenants' perspective from the pilot city Chongqing, China. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37(2), 1001-1027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Yangzom, P., Choden, S., & Bardhan, R. (2025). Residential satisfaction in a country that prioritises happiness: Empirical evidences from affordable housing in Bhutan. Cities, 162, 105887. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Yap, J. B. H., & Ng, X. H. (2018). Housing affordability in Malaysia: Perception, price range, influencing factors and policies. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 11(3), 476-497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Yusof, R. M., Khan, S. J. M., Yusuf, F. M., & Majid, N. H. A. (2019). Bridging the supply and demand gap for affordable home ownership in Malaysia: The roles of government and financial institutions. Planning Malaysia, 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zulkepli, M., & Rahman, M. S. A. (2025). Balancing affordability and sustainability: Unveiling homebuyers' preferences for green affordable housing criteria and features. Planning Malaysia, 23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Analysis of Housing Deficit in Urban Cities: A Case Study of Port Harcourt
- Selection Factors for Security Service Companies in Strata Schemes in Malaysia
- Greed, Grievance, and Guns: A Resource-Driven Conflict in Zimbabwe's Mining Communities - A Case Study of Marange Diamond Mines
- Public Acceptance of Durian Farmland Real Estate Investment Via Crowdfunding in Malaysia
- Students’ Perceptions on Value-Added the Islamic Estate Planning Course in Real Estate Education