Theories of Financial Accounting: Positive, Behavioral, and Institutional Perspectives.

This paper evaluated leading theoretical perspectives in auditing and international accounting. Specifically, we examined the Positive Accounting Theory (PAT), Behavioral Accounting Theory (BAT), and the Institutional Theory of Accounting. We assessed the individual and collective contributions of positive, behavioral, and institutional theories to the development of financial accounting theory. Notably, we traced the evolution of positive accounting from its earliest mention by Ball and Brown in the 1960s to the extensive research conducted by Watts and Zimmerman. Moreover, this paper assessed the intricate relationship between normative and positive accounting in both theory and professional practice. In summary, the development of positive, behavioral, and institutional approaches to accounting helped broaden the scope of financial accounting research and practice.

Accounting Theory; Behavioral; Financial Reporting; Institutional; Positive Theory; Normative Theory.

1. Ball, R. J. & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers, Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 159-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beaver, W. (1968). The information content of annual earnings announcements, Journal of Accounting Review, 67-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Belkaoui, A. (1989). Behavioral accounting: The research and practical issues. New York: Quorum Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Belkaoui, A. (2002). Behavioral management accounting. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Birnberg, J. G. (2000). The role of behavioral research in management accounting education in the 21st century, Issues in Accounting Education, 15(4), 713-728. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Birnberg, J. G. & Shields, J. F. (1989). Three decades of behavioral accounting research: A search for order, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 23-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burgstahler, D. & Sundem, G. L. (1989). The evolution of behavioral accounting research in the United States (1968-1987), Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 75-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Caplan, E. H. (1966). Behavioral assumptions of management accounting, The Accounting Review, 41(3), 496-509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Caplan, E. H. (1989). Behavioral accounting: A personal view, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 109-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Christenson, C. (1983). The methodology of positive accounting, The Accounting Review, 58(1), 1-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Devine, C. T. (1960). Research methodology and accounting theory formation, The Accounting Review, 35(3), pp. 387-399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gimzauskiene, E. & Kloviene, L. (2011). Performance measurement system: Towards an institutional theory, Engineering Economics, 22(4), 338-344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gong, M. Z. & Tse, M. S. C. (2009). Pick, mix or match? A discussion of theories for management accounting research, Journal of Accounting-Business & Management, 16(2), 54-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hermanson, R. H.; Edwards, J. D.; & Maher, M. W. (1992). Accounting principles. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin INC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Heugens, P. R. & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization, Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hoffman, A. J. & Ventresca, M. (2002). Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jensen, M. C. (1976). Reflections on the state of accounting research and the regulation of accounting. Stanford Lectures in Accounting 1976, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 11-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kam, V. (1990). Accounting Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kamoche, K., & Harvey, M. (2006). Knowledge diffusion in the African context: An institutional theory perspective, Thunderbird International Business Review, 48(2), 157-181. doi: 101002/tie20091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ma, Y. & Tayles, M. (2009). On the emergence of strategic management accounting: An institutional perspective, Accounting and Business Research, 39(5), 473-495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mattessich, R. (1957). Towards a general and axiomatic foundation of accountancy with an introduction to the matrix formulation of accounting systems, Accounting Research, pp. 328-356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Milne, M. J. (2002). Positive accounting theory, political costs and social disclosure analyses: A critical look, Critical Perspective on Accounting, 13, 369-395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pi-Tzong, J., Hsi-Peng, L., & Tzu-Chaun, C. (2012). The adoption of E-learning: An institutional theory perspective, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 326-343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sellers, R. D., Fogarty, T. J., & Parker, L. M. (2012). Unleashing the technical core: Institutional theory and the aftermath of Arthur Anderson, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24(1), 181-201. doi: 10.2308/bria-10176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Srivastava, R. P. & Mock, T. J. (2000). Belief functions in accounting behavioral research, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 3, 225-242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sterling, R. R. (1990). Positive accounting: An assessment, Abacus, 26(2), 97-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K. & Benbasa, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective, MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tuttle, B. & Dillard, J. (2007). Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. Accounting Research, Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 387-409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wanderley, C. A., Miranda, L. C., Meira, J. C., & Cullen, J. (2011). Management accounting change: A model based on three different theoretical frameworks, 8(2), 111-121. doi: 10.4013/base.2011.82.01. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1977). Corporate financial statements: A product of the market and political processes, Australian Journal of Management, 53-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards, The Accounting Review, 112-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten-year perspective, The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wolk, H. I., Tearney, M. G., & Dodd, J. L. (2001). Accounting theory: A conceptual and institutional approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization, Annual Review, 13, 443-464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors