Tradition Makes the New: Practitioner Knowledge and the Making of Creative Igal

Authors

Hafzan Zannie Hamza

Faculty of Music and Performing Arts, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800976

Subject Category: Tradition

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 14272-14286

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-06

Accepted: 2026-09-11

Published: 2026-09-22

Abstract

This study examines how experienced Bajau dance experts draw on culturally acquired knowledge when producing and evaluating deliberate creative Igal performance. Igal is practised among Sama-Bajau communities in the Sulu-Sulawesi region, with this study focusing on Semporna, Sabah. Seven transcript files representing four practitioners are re-analysed within an ethnographic archive built through fieldwork in 2007-2011 and follow-up practitioner research in 2015. Across the accounts, participation, mobilisation, transformation, and evaluation recur as connected moments in creative practice. Ros's encounter with the festival category kreasi (creative work) shows that practical creative competence may precede familiarity with an institutional vocabulary of creativity. Johan's compositional practice brings movement, musical repertoire, childhood memory, narrative, wedding practice, material culture, and professional artistic knowledge into new relationships as performance problems change. Ros, Johan, Haji Zainal, and Hajah Intan also describe judgement through culturally learnt relations among movement quality, musical response, style, adat (customary conventions), and rasa (felt practical judgement). Knowledgeable transformation names cases in which prior knowledge can be traced directly into creative decisions, while practised recognisability describes the culturally learnt and socially situated practice of judging whether transformed work still reads as Igal. Festival classification makes such expertise public by giving creative work categories, stages, audiences, and consequences. The expert accounts also show that institutional categories do not replace practitioner judgement. Festivals expose creative decisions to comparison, but movement-musical relationships, repertorial distinctions, customary expectations, and accumulated teaching experience remain central to how new work is made persuasive. In Semporna, tradition becomes creative knowledge through practitioners who draw on histories of participation to select, reorganise, and judge cultural resources in new artistic conditions.

Keywords

Igal, Sama-Bajau, practitioner knowledge, dance creativity, embodied knowledge

Downloads

References

1. Cerita, I. N. (2015). Traditional dance as a point of departure for the choreography of tari kreasi baru, new dance creations, in Bali. In M. A. Md Nor, P. Matusky, S. B. Tan, J. Pugh-Kitingan, & M. Hood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium of the ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of Southeast Asia (pp. 167-173). Institut Seni Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dalidowicz, M. (2015). Crafting fidelity: Pedagogical creativity in Kathak dance. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21(4), 838-854. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ellorin, B. (2015). Regatta Lepa 2013: A case study on the politicization of Sama Bajau music and dance in Semporna settlement, Sabah, Malaysia. In M. A. Md Nor, P. Matusky, S. B. Tan, J. Pugh-Kitingan, & M. Hood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium of the ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of Southeast Asia (pp. 21-25). Institut Seni Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Farnell, B. (1999). Moving bodies, acting selves. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 341-373. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Foley, C. E. (2020). Steps, style and sensing the difference: Transmission and the re-contextualisation of Molyneaux's traditional set dances within the Irish traditional dance competitive arena. Research in Dance Education, 21(3), 312-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2020.1776242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gilmore, S. (2000). Doing culture work: Negotiating tradition and authenticity in Filipino folk dance. Sociological Perspectives, 43(4), S21-S41. https://doi.org/10.2307/41888815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Glassie, H. (1995). Tradition. The Journal of American Folklore, 108(430), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.2307/541653 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hamza, H. Z. (2012). Hybridity in presentational dance: The Igal of Bajau Laut in Semporna, Sabah. In M. A. Md Nor (Ed.), Dancing mosaic: Issues on dance hybridity (pp. 132-140). Cultural Centre, University of Malaya & National Department for Culture and Arts. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hamza, H. Z. (2013). Igal: The traditional performing arts of the Bajau Laut in Semporna, Sabah [Master's thesis, University of Malaya]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hamza, H. Z. (2015). Performing intercultural experience: Negotiating Igal (dance) by the Bajau community in Semporna, Sabah. In M. A. Md Nor, P. Matusky, S. B. Tan, J. Pugh-Kitingan, & M. Hood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium of the ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of Southeast Asia (pp. 49-53). Institut Seni Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hamza, H. Z. (2017a). From observation to practice: Competence in the performative signifiers of Igal dance tradition. In M. A. Md Nor (Ed.), Perspectives on dance education (pp. 68-76). Nusantara Performing Arts Research Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hamza, H. Z. (2017b). Translating male Igal movement through visual-auditory and kinaesthetic experience in Semporna. In M. A. Md Nor (Ed.), Perspectives on Bajau/Sama' diaspora (Sabah Museum Monograph, Vol. 13, pp. 92-97). Department of Sabah Museum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Handler, R., & Linnekin, J. (1984). Tradition, genuine or spurious. The Journal of American Folklore, 97(385), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/540610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Heywood, P., & Yarrow, T. (2026). On the problem of continuity: A theory of culture beyond invention. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 32(2), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.70023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hussin, H., & Santamaria, M. C. M. (2012). Igal kata-kata (narrative Igal): Examining approaches to the interpretation of folk tales in Sama traditional dance choreography. In H. Hussin & M. C. M. Santamaria (Eds.), Sama celebrations: Ritual, music and dance of Sama Dilaut and Sama Bajau in Southern Philippines and North Borneo (IOES Monograph Series 12, pp. 105-116). Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hussin, H., & Santamaria, M. C. M. (2013). Igal campur: Interrogating hybridity in Sama traditional dance. In M. A. Md Nor, P. Matusky, S. B. Tan, J. Pugh-Kitingan, & F. Prudente (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium of the ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of Southeast Asia (pp. 140-145). Philippine Women's University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ingold, T., & Hallam, E. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In T. Ingold & E. Hallam (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 1-24). Berg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jabatan Kebudayaan dan Kesenian Negara. (2015). INSPITARI 2014 [DVD]. https://portal.jkkn.gov.my/en/catalog/cd-dvd-vcd-publication/606-inspitari-2014-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jabatan Kebudayaan dan Kesenian Negara. (2016). Lagu-lagu INSPITARI 2015 [CD]. https://portal.jkkn.gov.my/en/catalog/cd-dvd-vcd-publication/601-lagu-lagu-inspitari-2015-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jabatan Warisan Negara. (2012). Warisan Kebangsaan 2012. https://www.heritage.gov.my/en/2012-recognitions.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kaeppler, A. L. (2001). Dance and the concept of style. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 33, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kaeppler, A. L. (2007). Method and theory in analyzing dance structure with an analysis of Tongan dance. In A. L. Kaeppler & E. I. Dunin (Eds.), Dance structures: Perspectives on the analysis of human movement (pp. 53-102). Akadémiai Kiadó. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kim, S. I. (2023). The unreconciled dichotomy: Preservation and (re)creation of dance heritage in South Korea. Dance Chronicle, 46(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2022.2154504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Md Nor, M. A. (2001). Blurring images, glowing likenesses: Old and new styles in traditional dances of Malaysia. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 33, 65-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519631 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ram, K. (2000). Listening to the call of dance: Re-thinking authenticity and 'essentialism'. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 11(2), 358-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2000.tb00050.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Santaella, M. A. (2016). Sounding movement extrinsically and intrinsically: An ethno-choreomusicological analysis of Tarirai among the Bajau Laut in Semporna, Sabah. Musika Jornal, 12, 70-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Santamaria, M. C. M., & Abad, R. (2016). Reconfiguring folk performance for the contemporary stage: Sintang Dalisay and the Igal of the Sama-Bajau in Southern Philippines. In N. Duangwises & L. D. Skar (Eds.), The folk performing arts in ASEAN (pp. 301-322). Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sklar, D. (2000). Reprise: On dance ethnography. Dance Research Journal, 32(1), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1478278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wang, J., Leng, P. G., & Saearani, M. F. T. B. (2026). Standardising tradition, negotiating authenticity: Institutionalising Yi Cigarette Case Dance in contemporary China. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(7), 8684-8698. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wilcox, E. E. (2018). Dynamic inheritance: Representative works and the authoring of tradition in Chinese dance. Journal of Folklore Research, 55(1), 77-111. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.55.1.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wilf, E. (2014). Semiotic dimensions of creativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 397-412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yung, B. (2019). Exploring creativity in traditional music. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 51, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/ytm.2019.46 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles