Political Mythmaking and Threat Representation in Donald Trump’s Discourse on Iran: A Diachronic Critical Discourse Analysis

The present study explores the construction of political myths and the representation of threat in Donald Trump’s discourse during his first presidency on Iran (2017-2020). The study used a qualitative diachronic Critical Discourse Analysis approach to examine a selection of presidential official speeches and statements where Iran had been a major foreign policy concern after the heightened tensions between the US and Iran. The analysis focused on how the lexical selection, evaluation, security framing and oppositional binary pairs helped create the image of Iran as a threat. The findings of the study have brought out three major discursive themes. The first one is that of existential threat of Iran, which is associated with nuclear threats, terrorism, regional destabilization and chaos and immorality. The second theme is that of political mythmaking of American exceptionalism and national protection, which portrays the United States as a powerful and moral nation that is supposed to protect global and national security. The third discursive theme was one of moral polarization and enemy creation, in which Iran is presented as a dangerous country and the US and its leader as morally right and necessary to protect from threats. The study concludes that the discourse about Iran by Trump is not just an account of foreign policy issues but is involved in active meaning-making that ties the issue of threat with national identity and legitimacy of leadership.

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Donald Trump, Iran, political discourse, political mythmaking, threat representation

1. Ahmad, Y., Nazim, M., & Nijabat, A. (2025). Framing power and conflict: A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s posts on the Iran–Israel war. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation, 11(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Husseini, H. A. M. & Al-Obaidi, A.E.J. (2026). Strategic Silence in Iraqi Political Discourse: A Rhetorical-Pragmatic Analysis. Journal of Daoist Studies, 19(S5), 593–602. Retrieved from https://journalofdaoiststudies.org/index.php/journal/article/view/909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Hussaini, M. F., & Noreen, N. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of US President Donald Trump’s speech in the UN General Assembly 2018. Global Social Sciences Review, 10(3), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2025(X-III).09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Sabbagh, H. N. H., Rezvani, E., Al-Jameel, B. J. K., & Hadian, B. (2025). Linguistic Construction of Domination and Demonization in Political Discourse: A Critical Analysis of Donald Trump's Islamophobic Rhetoric. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning, 4(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Atmawijaya, T. D., & Sartika, D. (2024). Reclaiming the narrative: A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign speech using Fairclough’s three levels of analysis. K@ta, 26(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.26.2.88-97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bibi, Z., Qias, M., & Hayat, Q. (2025). Strategic Persuasion and Public Opinion Shaping: A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump's rhetoric on the US-Iran conflict. Advance Social Science Archive Journal, 3(02), 2228-2238. https://www.assajournal.com/index.php/36/issue/view/11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bottici, C. (2007). A philosophy of political myth. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chilton, P. (2017). Language and the global political economy. Routledge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Degaf, A., & Ashfiya, H. (2025). Moralizing war and constructing enemies in Trump’s 2025 Iran speech. PARADIGM: Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.18860/prdg.v8i2.36758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. El Bakri, J. (2025). Political discourse analysis: A critical analysis of Donald Trump’s political speeches. CaLLs: Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics, 11(2), 155–171. https://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/CALLS/article/view/18876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Flood, C. G. (1996). Political myth: A theoretical introduction. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lacatus, C. (2021). Populism and President Trump’s approach to foreign policy: An analysis of tweets and rally speeches. Politics, 41(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Prahallad, L., & Mamidi, R. (2025). Bias in political dialogue: Tagging U.S. presidential debates with an extended DAMSL framework. arXiv, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.19515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Trump, D. J. (2017, October 13). Remarks by President Trump on Iran strategy. The White House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Trump, D. J. (2018, May 8). Remarks by President Trump on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The White House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Trump, D. J. (2020, January 8). Remarks by President Trump on Iran. The White House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ungureanu, C., & Serrano, I. (2020). Populism as narrative, myth making, and the “logic” of political emotions. Journal of the British Academy, 8(s1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/008s1.037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Discourse and power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Welker, B. (2025). Geopolitical mythmaking: A narrative study of German far-right media discourse on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Critical Discourse Studies, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2524372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhou, K., Meitus, A. A., Chase, M., Wang, G., Mykland, A., Howell, W., & Tan, C. (2024). Quantifying the uniqueness and divisiveness of presidential discourse. PNAS Nexus, 3(10), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar