Mother-in-Law Involvement and Nuclear Family Unity among Families in Tseikuru Sub-County, Kitui County, Kenya: A Qualitative Study

Authors

Julius Nzambu Kuti

Department of Counselling Psychology, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa (Kenya)

Dr. Philomena Ndambuki

Department of Counselling Psychology, International Leadership University (Kenya)

Dr. Elizabeth Gichimu

Department of Counselling, Psychology Daystar University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100801058

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 15448-15460

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-05

Accepted: 2026-09-10

Published: 2026-09-24

Abstract

Background: Mother-in-law involvement can significantly shape relationships, belonging, and cohesion within nuclear families, particularly in contexts where traditional expectations of intergenerational authority intersect with the growing desire of couples for autonomy. Aim: This study explored how the influence of mothers-in-law relates to nuclear family unity in Tseikuru Sub-County, Kitui County, Kenya. Methods: The study adopted a qualitative phenomenological design guided by Communication Accommodation Theory. Ten participants, comprising five mothers-in-law and five daughters-in-law, were purposively selected. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed using manual qualitative coding and inductive thematic analysis. Results: Four interrelated themes emerged: cultural expectations and the negotiation of family belonging; relational tension, discomfort and emotional distance; intrusion, boundary violations and threats to nuclear family autonomy; and family division, withdrawal and erosion of family unity. Participants described how conflicting cultural expectations, criticism, unwanted advice, limited openness, perceived intrusion, and weakly negotiated family boundaries could contribute to emotional distance and reduced family cohesion. However, supportive and respectful involvement was perceived as potentially strengthening intergenerational relationships. Conclusion: Mother-in-law influence relates to nuclear family unity through communication, boundary negotiation, belonging, and the quality of intergenerational relationships. Involvement that respects nuclear family autonomy and promotes mutual accommodation may strengthen cohesion.

Keywords

mother-in-law influence; nuclear family unity; family cohesion; daughters-in-law; intergenerational relationships; Communication Accommodation Theory; qualitative study; Kenya.

Downloads

References

1. Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (1995). Family therapy: A systemic integration (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allendorf, K. (2017). Like her own: Ideals and experiences of the mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationship. Journal of Family Issues, 38(15), 2102–2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15590685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amevenku, F. M., & Boaheng, I. (2020). Theology of the prophet Amos: A paradigm for addressing Ghana’s socio-political and religious challenges. Conspectus, 29(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC-1ef77b62be [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., & Nicholson, J. H. (1999). Turning points in the development of blended families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599163002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Harwood, J., Soliz, J., & Lin, M.-C. (2006). Communication accommodation theory: An intergroup approach to family relationships. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 129–146). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Merrill, D. M. (2007). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Giles, H., Taylor, D. M., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation thorough speech: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2, 177-192. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500000701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Harwood, J., Raman, P., & Hewstone, M. (2006). The family and communication dynamics of group salience. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 181–200. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Marotz-Baden, R., & Cowan, D. (1987). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: The effects of proximity on conflict and stress. Family Relations, 36, 385-390. doi:10.2307/584488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Merrill, D. M. (2007). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mikucki-Enyart, S. L. (2011). Parent-in-law privacy management: An examination of the links among relational uncertainty, topic avoidance, in-group status, and in-law satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 237-263. doi:10.1080/15267431.2010.544633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rittenour, C. E. (2012). Daughter-in-law standards for mother-in-law communication: Associations with daughter-in-law perceptions of relational satisfaction and shared family identity. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 93-110. doi:10.1080/15267431.2010.537240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rittenour, C. E., & Soliz, J. (2009). Communicative and relational dimensions of shared family identity and relational intentions in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships: Developing a conceptual model for mother-in-law/daughter-in-law research. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 67-90. doi:10.1080/10570310802636334 64 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Serewicz, M. C. M., & Canary, D. J. (2008). Assessments of disclosure from the in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family privacy orientations, and relational quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 333-357. doi: 10.1177/0265407507087962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Serewicz, M. C. M., Hosmer, R., Ballard, R. L., & Griffin, R. A. (2008). Disclosure from In-laws and the quality of in-law and marital relationships. Communication Quarterly, 56, 427-444. doi:10.1080/01463370802453642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of communication accommodation theory. Annuals of the International Communication Association, 38, 107-143. doi:10.1080/23808985.2014.11679160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Soliz, J., & Harwood, J. (2006). Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Communication Monographs, 73, 87-107. doi:10.1080/03637750500534388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Soliz, J., & Rittenour, C. E. (2012). Family as an intergroup arena. In H. Giles (Ed.), The Handbook of Intergroup Communication (pp. 331-342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hung, C.-H. (2005). Women's postpartum stress, social support, and health status. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 27(2), 148–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kebaya, C. (2017). Inventing women: Female voice in Kenyan television drama. Eastern African Literary and Cultural Studies, 3(2–4), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/23277408.2017.1369735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Merrill, D. M. (2007). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Praeger Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shih, K. Y., & Pyke, K. D. (2010). Power, resistance, and emotional economies in women's relationships with mothers-in-law in Chinese immigrant families. Journal of Family Issues, 31(3), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09350875 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Turner, M. J., Young, C. R., & Black, K. I. (2006). Daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law seeking their place within the family: A qualitative study of differing viewpoints. Family Relations, 55(5), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00428.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vera-Sanso, P. (1999). Dominant daughters-in-law and submissive mothers-in-law? Cooperation and conflict in South India. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles