Factors Influencing the Oral Output of Foreign Language Learners: A Case Study in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language

Globalisation has created an urgent need for individuals to communicate across cultures, making oral communication a vital component of foreign language learning. This study investigates how Flipgrid, a video-based discussion platform, can enhance oral output and communicative competence among students learning Chinese as a foreign language. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through classroom observations, analysis of students’ oral outputs, and semi-structured interviews. The participants were purposively selected from among high-performing students enrolled in a Level 2 Mandarin course (TMC151). The findings revealed that Flipgrid provided learners with an interactive and flexible platform that fostered communication, collaboration, and reflection. Students expressed increased motivation, confidence, and willingness to communicate in Chinese, perceiving Flipgrid as a meaningful tool for practising oral skills beyond the traditional classroom. The study also found that the platform’s asynchronous nature enabled students to self-monitor their progress and engage in self-paced learning. However, while Flipgrid enhanced opportunities for peer interaction, limited contact with native speakers restricted the authenticity of the communicative experience. Overall, the integration of Flipgrid successfully bridged the gap between formal and informal learning environments, supporting constructivist and communicative language learning principles. The study concludes that incorporating digital platforms like Flipgrid can effectively promote intrinsic motivation, improve oral fluency, and provide learners with authentic opportunities for language use. Future research should explore how technology-mediated communication can be enriched through cross-cultural collaboration and longitudinal tracking of oral skill development.

flipgrid, oral communication

1. Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dao, P. (2020). Effect of interaction strategy instruction on learner engagement in peer interaction. System, 94, 102244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dao, P., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., & Chi, D. N. (2020). Reflective learning practice for promoting adolescent EFL learners’ attention to form. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1763180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Deshmukh, V., & Nirmala, S. J. (2019). Open domain conversational chatbot. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 1025, pp. 266–278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98113-9187-3_21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ghazali, N., Mohd Said, N. E., & Hua, T. K. (2020). Understanding second language anxiety: Feedback from ESL learners in TVET. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2057–2063. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hashim, H. U., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2018). Bitesize learning: WhatsApp status for English communication skills. Eduinnovation, 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hashim, H. U., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2019). Three-minute pitching with Flipgrid: An antidote of innovation for speaking anxiety. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(7), 1798–1801. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Janzen, K. J., Perry, B., & Edwards, M. (2017). Building blocks: Enmeshing technology and creativity with artistic pedagogical technologies. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 4–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1124955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Johnson, M., & Skarphol, M. (2018). The effects of digital portfolios and Flipgrid on student engagement and communication in a connected learning secondary visual arts classroom [Master’s thesis, St. Catherine University]. Sophia Repository. https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kim, D., Ruecker, D., & Kim, D. J. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning experiences. In Computer Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1059–1077). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7663-1.ch049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lancaster, K. (2018). Motivation in language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lancaster, K. N. (2018). Extramural exposure and language attainment: The examination of input-related variables in CLIL programmes. Porta Linguarum, 29, 91–114. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Loewen, S., & Wolff, D. (2016). Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163–184). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.08loe [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Postigo-Fuentes, A. Y., & Fernández-Navas, M. (2020). Factores que influyen el aprendizaje de lengua extranjera en los eSports: Un estudio de caso. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(2), 128–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.4997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Salomonsson, J. (2020). Modified output and learner uptake in casual online learner-learner conversation. System, 93, 102306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yeh, H.-C., & Lai, W.-Y. (2019). Speaking progress and meaning negotiation processes in synchronous online tutoring. System, 81, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study