Public Speaking Anxiety among University Students: A Systematic Literature Review of Contributing Factors, Causes, Pedagogical Interventions, and Innovative Reduction Strategies

Public speaking anxiety is a persistent challenge among university students and may negatively affect academic participation, oral performance, confidence, and willingness to communicate. This systematic literature review (SLR) synthesizes empirical evidence on the contributing factors, causes, pedagogical interventions, and innovative strategies associated with reducing public speaking anxiety among university and EFL students. Following the PRISMA framework, a systematic search was conducted using Scopus and Web of Science databases, generating 396 records. After screening and eligibility assessment, 23 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. The selected studies were evaluated using six quality-assessment criteria and demonstrated scores ranging from 75.0% to 100.0%. The findings were organized into four themes: (1) factors associated with public speaking anxiety, (2) causes of public speaking anxiety, (3) pedagogical interventions, and (4) innovative reduction strategies. The review identifies low self-esteem, limited confidence, linguistic difficulties, fear of negative evaluation, fear of failure, demographic characteristics, inadequate preparation, and audience or lecturer-related concerns as prominent contributors. Evidence further indicates that structured practice, peer feedback, instructor guidance, supervised presentations, self-reflection, and communication workshops can reduce anxiety and strengthen oral competence. Innovative approaches, particularly virtual reality, AI-supported feedback, and technology-enhanced learning, also demonstrate promising effects, although resilience enhancement alone may not specifically reduce public speaking apprehension. The review highlights the need for integrated, learner-centred, and context-sensitive approaches combining psychological, linguistic, pedagogical, and technological support.

Public speaking anxiety; University students; Communication apprehension; Pedagogical interventions; Virtual reality

1. Ab Abdullah, A. T. H., Netra, I. M., & Hassan, I. (2024). Difficulties faced by undergraduate students in English public speaking at a Malaysian university. Arab World English Journal, 15(1), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no1.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abed, L. G. (2022). Measuring the correlation that exists between communication apprehension and self-esteem among university students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies, 21(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7882/CGP/v21i01/77-90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Awaji, N. N., Mortada, E. M., & Alkahtani, R. (2025). Impact of resilience enhancement on communication apprehension among health communication sciences students during the COVID-19 pandemic: An experimental study. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1345. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07975-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al Hanake, N. (2024). Examining foreign language learners’ speaking anxiety: The case of English L2 learners. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al Samman, A. M. (2022). Exploring students' anxiety determinants in English-oriented educational programs. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 32(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2022.125030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alnaeem, L. A. (2025). The power of self-talk for speaking anxiety reduction among EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balachandran, A., Vohra, P., & Srivastava, A. (2024). A virtual reality approach to overcome glossophobia among university students. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1145/3698141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Balakrishnan, S., Abdullah, N. L., & Sui, L. K. M. (2022). Glossophobia among engineering learners: A case study at a technical university. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i1.17154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 349–373). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, Y.-C. (2024). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on reducing EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 789–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Garner, L. E., Steinberg, E. J., & McKay, D. (2021). Exposure therapy. In A. Wenzel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy: Overview and approaches (pp. 275–312). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000218-010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grieve, R., Woodley, J., Hunt, S. E., & McKay, A. (2021). Student fears of oral presentations and public speaking in higher education: A qualitative survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1948509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gürbüz, C., & Cabaroğlu, N. (2021). EFL students’ perceptions of oral presentations: Implications for motivation, language ability and speech anxiety. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kamata, A., Ariffin, K., Aziz, R. A., Abas, N., Ahmad, B. E., & Okada, H. (2025). Investigating Japanese EFL learners' communication apprehension and oral presentation strategies. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(6), 4231–4243. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.34246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Keane, C., Waldeck, D., Holliman, A., Goodman, S., & Choudhry, K. (2021). Exploring the experience of anxiety among final year students at university: A thematic analysis. Qualitative Report, 26(8), 2621–2630. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.3). EBSE Technical Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lintner, T., & Belovecová, B. (2024). Demographic predictors of public speaking anxiety among university students. Current Psychology, 43(30), 25215–25223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06216-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. López-Pérez, M., Retamar, G. D., & Méndez, M. J. R. (2023). Anxiety when developing oral skills in university students of English as a foreign language. Tejuelo: Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, 38, 201–230. https://doi.org/10.17398/1988-8430.38.201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Maldonado, M. A., Garcí, A. G., Crespo, J. M. A., Aló, F. J., & Osella, E. M. M. (2022). Oral skills and anxiety: Training and efficacy in undergraduate students. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 80, 401–434. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2022-1800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McCarthy, C., Mejía, O. L., & Liu, H.-T. T. (2000). Cognitive appraisal theory: A psychoeducational approach for understanding connections between cognition and emotion in group work. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933920008411455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence: Conceptualizations and perspectives. In J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Sonandre (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (2nd ed.). Hampton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mhuentoei, R. (2023). Public speaking anxiety of Thai undergraduates comparing online presentation and onsite presentation. New English Teacher, 17(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nyamekye, E., Mutawakil, A. R., & Slippe, D. P. (2025). The predictive impact of linguistic anxiety and 'fear of lecturers' on students' willingness to communicate in class. Discover Psychology, 5(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00348-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Quevedo-Bayona, I., Escolar-Llamazares, M. C., Martínez-Martín, M. A., & Carrasco, F. L. A. (2025). Descriptive study on state and trait anxiety levels in university students and their potential influencing factors. Societies, 15(10), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15100287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rahman, H., Mohammad, S., & Swarna, S. T. (2024). Voices in peril: Understanding English public speaking anxiety among university students in Bangladesh. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2355381. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2355381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Roslim, N., Nimehchisalem, V., Abdullah, M. H. T., & Razali, N. M. (2023). Students’ perceptions of personality traits, presentation skills, and audience factors in their online presentations. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.25542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tatlı, C., & Karadağ, M. (2024). Reducing public speaking anxiety through the use of virtual reality assisted distraction: A systematic pilot study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(13), 3061–3070. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2270633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar