Repairing the Psychological Contract after Mergers and Acquisitions: An Integrative Conceptual Framework of Organizational Justice, Trust Repair, and Employee Voice

Mergers and acquisitions alter more than formal structures: they also unsettle employees’ beliefs about what the organization has promised and what each party owes the other. Although post-merger research documents uncertainty, justice perceptions, trust loss, and psychological contract breach, these streams are often examined separately and usually emphasize negative reactions rather than repair. This conceptual paper develops an integrative framework of psychological-contract reconstruction during post-merger integration. Drawing on psychological contract theory, organizational justice, trust-repair research, and employee voice scholarship, the framework begins with an M&A-specific inherited-obligation discontinuity: employees may continue to hold pre-merger promises while responsibility shifts to a successor organization. This discontinuity increases breach risk without being equivalent to breach. Procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice are proposed to buffer the effect of breach on trust loss; organizational reparative actions are distinguished from the employee outcome of trust recovery; and breach–repair fit strengthens the credibility of those actions. The voice pathway is decomposed into voice opportunities, employee speaking behavior, and managerial responsiveness. Psychological-contract reconstruction is defined as a mutually intelligible and credible revision of reciprocal obligations rather than reluctant acceptance of reduced expectations. Seven propositions specify direct, mediating, and moderating relationships and a temporal process with feedback and failure conditions. The framework extends post-merger research by clarifying how successor organizations inherit and renegotiate legacy obligations and by separating justice appraisal, reparative action, trust recovery, voice, and contract reconstruction. For practice, it suggests diagnosing inherited and broken obligations, matching reparative actions to those obligations, making decision processes contestable and explainable, and ensuring that employee voice receives a substantive response. The model offers a testable agenda for longitudinal research on employee-centered post-merger integration.

psychological contract; post-merger integration; organizational justice; trust repair; employee voice

1. Afshan, G., Serrano-Archimi, C., & Lacroux, A. (2021). Raising voice: Effect of psychological contract breach on employee voice through organizational cynicism. Human Systems Management, 40(6), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-201108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Hosani, Y., Jabeen, F., Paul, J., & Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (2020). Antecedents of employee alienation and its impact on individual work performance during post-merger integration (PMI). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(6), 1085–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-03-2020-0085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., & Van der Velde, M. E. G. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 143–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bansal, A. (2020). Thinking of mergers and acquisitions? Think of justice: A people perspective. International Journal of Manpower, 41(4), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2019-0087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bird, A., Ikegami, J. J., & Mikami, K. (2022). Opportunism and trust in cross-national lateral collaboration: The Renault-Nissan Alliance and a theory of equity-trust. Journal of World Business, 57(3), 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Håkanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3), 395–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Botha, L., & Steyn, R. (2023). Psychological contracts and employee voice: Does breach matter? African Journal of Employee Relations. https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/11901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 68–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gillespie, N., & Dietz, G. (2009). Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 127–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gong, B., & Sims, R. L. (2023). Psychological contract breach during the pandemic: How an abrupt transition to a work from home schedule impacted the employment relationship. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Henderson, K. E., Welsh, E. T., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2020). ‘Oops, I did it’ or ‘It wasn’t me’: An examination of psychological contract breach repair tactics. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09624-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Holland, D., & Scullion, H. (2021). Towards a talent retention model: Mapping the building blocks of the psychological contract to the three stages of the acquisition process. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(13), 2683–2728. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1569546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kähkönen, T. (2021). Repairing trust within teams after organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(5), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2020-0348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kähkönen, T., Blomqvist, K., Gillespie, N., & Vanhala, M. (2021). Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 130, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lin, X., Wu, C.-H., Dong, Y., Chen, G. Z. X., Wei, W., & Duan, J. (2022). Psychological contract breach and destructive voice: The mediating effect of relative deprivation and the moderating effect of leader emotional support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 135, 103720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Manalsuren, S., Senior, C., Fearon, C., & McLaughlin, H. (2017). How might your staff react to news of an institutional merger? A psychological contract approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(3), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (2011). Merge ahead: A research agenda to increase merger and acquisition success. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Raeder, S. (2023). Sustaining psychological contracts during organizational change. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 54, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-023-00683-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sanders, J., & Florkowski, G. W. (2025). Sense and sensibility in psychological contracting: A multi-phasic perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 41(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2023-0694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schweiger, D. M., & DeNisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.5465/256304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Seo, M.-G., & Hill, N. S. (2005). Understanding the human side of merger and acquisition: An integrative framework. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 422–443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305281902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sverdrup, T. E., & Stensaker, I. G. (2018). Restoring trust in the context of strategic change. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being