Studying Inquiry-Based Science Learning Through Researcher-Supported Lesson Study in Malaysia: A Two-School Case Study

Authors

Toshinobu Hatanaka

Toho University, Japan (Japan)

Nur Jahan Ahmad

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang (Malaysia)

Marina Mokhtar

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang Branch, Penang (Malaysia)

Wan Mazlina Wan Mehammud

Penang Matriculation College, Penang (Malaysia)

Siti Nor Fazila Ramly

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang (Malaysia)

Fasya Abdull Hamid

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang (Malaysia)

Ahmad Adnan Mohd Shukri

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100801184

Subject Category: Social Studies

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 17300-17313

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-11

Accepted: 2026-09-16

Published: 2026-09-26

Abstract

Lesson Study, as part of professional learning communities, has gained attention in Malaysia as a strategy for examining and refining classroom practice. This two-school case study examined how inquiry-based science learning became visible and examinable within researcher-supported Lesson Study informed by Japanese practices. Across one primary and one lower-secondary school, teachers collaboratively planned and enacted two research lessons on the lever system in each setting. Data included direct lesson observations, video recordings, lesson plan, and post-lesson discussions. Four authors independently scored the lessons using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP), with consensus scores used descriptively rather than inferentially. A qualitative inquiry-structure analysis examined four dimensions: problem framing, experimentation and data collection, evidence-to-explanation reasoning, and material-inquiry alignment. RTOP scores ranged from 43 to 62, while lesson evidence showed that all four lessons contained inquiry-oriented elements but differed in coherence. Lesson Study discussions surfaced recurring problems in framing investigable questions, guiding data collection, supporting evidence-based reasoning, and aligning materials with scientific purposes. The documented revision from Lesson C to Lesson D further showed how identified pedagogical problems could inform subsequent redesign of the task and materials. The study does not establish longitudinal teacher growth or student learning effects; instead, it shows how Lesson Study can make the epistemic coherence of inquiry visible for collaborative professional examination. Contextual constraints included curriculum pacing, planning time, and students’ limited familiarity with sustained inquiry.

Keywords

Lesson Study, Science, Inquiry-based learning

Downloads

References

1. Arifin, Z., Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2592. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H. J., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E., Oosterheert, I., & Mulder, M. (2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609-2640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akita, K., & Sakamoto, A. (2017). Lesson study and teachers’ professional development in Japan. In K. Wood & S. Sithamparam (Eds.), Realising Learning: Teachers’ professional development through lesson and learning study (pp. 25–40). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alston, A. S., Pedrick, L., Morris, K. P., & Basu, R. (2011). Lesson study as a tool for developing teachers’ close attention to students’ mathematical thinking. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 135–151). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Doğan, S., Pringle, R. M., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: a review. Professional Development in Education, 42, 569 - 588. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171–185. doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)001026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fujii, T. (2014). Implementing Japanese lesson study in foreign countries: misconceptions revealed. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fujii, T. (2016). What can we learn from the Japanese model of professional growth from novice to expert? [Presentation]. Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hatanaka,T. (2017). Describing and analysing Inquiry-based science teaching in Japanese lesson study, Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 40(2), 122-141. http://www.recsam.edu.my/sub_JSMESEA/index.php/journal-collection/journals-2010-2019/2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kersting, M., Karlsen, S., Ødegaard, M., Olufsen, M., Kjærnsli, M., & Suhr Lunde, M. L. (2023). Studying the quality of inquiry-based teaching in science classrooms. A systematic video study of inquiry-based science teaching in primary and lower-secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1463-1484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kulpa, S. (2021). An investigation of success factors in a high school algebra I program. Lindenwood University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lapoule, P., & Lynch, R. (2018). The case study method: exploring the link between teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(5), 485-500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., Friedkin, S., & Roth, J. R. (2012). Improving teaching does improve teachers: Evidence from lesson study. Journal of teacher education, 63(5), 368-375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lewis, C. (2016). How does lesson study improve mathematics instruction?. ZDM, 48, 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0792-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinneman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lim, C. S., Teh, K. H., & Chiew, C. M. (2018). Promoting and implementing lesson study in Malaysia: Issue of sustainability. Mathematics Lesson Study Around the World: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 47-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mizwar, M., Setiawan, H., Rogahang, M. K., & Tikulembang, G. A. (2026). Implementation of the inquiry learning model to enhance junior high school students’ scientific literacy: A qualitative study. Priviet Social Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i3.1261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Piburn, M., & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual (ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3). Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED447205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rahim, S., Sulaiman, S., & Sulaiman, T. (2015). Teacher professional development through lesson study in secondary schools. Advanced Science Letters, 21, 2360-2364. doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Saito, E. (2012). Key issues of lesson study in Japan and the United States: a literature review. Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 777-789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R. & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: the reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245–253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Stigler, J. W., and Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Willems, I., & Van den Bossche, P. (2019). Lesson Study effectiveness for teachers’ professional learning: A best evidence synthesis. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2019-0031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles