Oral Reading Performance and Language Subject Achievement among Grade 3 Learners

Authors

Yoshiko Gen C. Pardo

Guihulngan City, Negros Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900032

Subject Category: Language Education

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 535-542

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-18

Accepted: 2026-09-23

Published: 2026-09-28

Abstract

Reading assessment provides a basis for identifying learners’ instructional needs and examining their achievement in language subjects. This study examined oral reading performance and language subject achievement among 32 Grade 3 learners at Hinakpan Elementary School, Guihulngan City, Negros Oriental, during school year 2024–2025. A descriptive correlational documentary design analyzed learner profiles, Philippine Informal Reading Inventory worksheets, and achievement summaries in English, Filipino, and Mother Tongue. Frequencies, percentages, means, and sample standard deviations described the cohort and its performance, while six Pearson coefficients from the study’s statistical summaries described reading–achievement associations. English word-recognition accuracy averaged 64.75% (SD = 25.63), and comprehension averaged 33.13% (SD = 28.56). Filipino word-recognition accuracy averaged 88.23% (SD = 11.05), and comprehension averaged 65.63% (SD = 31.18). Seven learners (21.88%) obtained English grades below 75; all learners obtained grades of at least 75 in Filipino and Mother Tongue. Positive correlations ranged from .449 to .541 for English oral reading and from .485 to .598 for Filipino oral reading. The findings indicate varied reading needs within the cohort and support integrating word recognition and comprehension instruction into language learning. A proposed eight-week intervention combines explicit word instruction, supported passage reading, vocabulary development, comprehension activities, and progress monitoring. The study provides a school-level basis for differentiated instruction and subsequent evaluation of the proposed intervention.

Keywords

oral reading, word recognition, reading comprehension

Downloads

References

1. Cabell, S. Q., & Hwang, H. (2020). Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S99–S107. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Denton, C. A., Hall, C., Cho, E., Cannon, G., Scammacca, N., & Wanzek, J. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of foundational skills and multicomponent reading interventions on reading comprehension for primary-grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, Article 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DO_s2015_08.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Education. (2018). Policy guidelines on the administration of the revised Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2018). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2018/03/26/do-14-s-2018-policy-guidelines-on-the-administration-of-the-revised-philippine-informal-reading-inventory/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hudson, A., Koh, P. W., Moore, K. A., & Binks-Cantrell, E. (2020). Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: A synthesis of research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences, 10(3), Article 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Newell, K. W., Codding, R. S., & Fortune, T. W. (2020). Oral reading fluency as a screening tool with English learners: A systematic review. Psychology in the Schools, 57(8), 1208–1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles