Stigma, Cultural Belief, and Family Decision-Making in Emergency Caesarean Section: A Qualitative Study of Women in Southeast Nigeria

Authors

Vitalis U. Ukoji

Department of Sociology, Federal University Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Ifeanyichukwu C. Eze

Department of Psychology, Dennis Osadebay University, Asaba, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Chiagolum E. Ayogu

Department of Political Science, Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil, Kano State, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Vitus N. Ukoji

Department of Transnational and Diaspora Studies, Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900002

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 8-20

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-11

Accepted: 2026-09-16

Published: 2026-09-28

Abstract

This study examined how stigma, cultural belief, and family decision-making authority shape women's acceptance of emergency CS in Southeast Nigeria. A qualitative, interpretivist design employing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was adopted. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 52 women aged 18 years and above who had undergone emergency CS in Enugu, Ebonyi, and Imo States, purposively sampled to achieve maximum variation in age, parity, education, and religious affiliation. Data were analysed through a case-by-case and then cross-case procedure, supported by a structured coding framework. Four inter-related patterns emerged. First, husbands, or in their absence other senior male relatives, held the formal authority to consent to CS, functioning as gatekeepers to care even when women themselves recognised the danger first, though mothers-in-law and sisters occupied a further, sometimes decisive, layer of influence. Second, CS was persistently framed as evidence of a failure of womanhood, most vividly through a “Hebrew woman” narrative idealising unaided vaginal delivery, producing post-operative stigma that some younger, urban, and more educated women actively resisted, while others, including women of high parity, described the stigma as compounding rather than easing with repeated childbearing. Third, traditional and spiritual explanatory frameworks, including ancestral and herbal interpretations of obstetric complications, at times delayed biomedical care before it was sought. Fourth, fear of death, distance from a capable facility, cost, and the woman's own health literacy shaped how the other three patterns played out in practice. Stigma, cultural belief, and family decision-making authority operate as an independent and, at times, decisive barrier to timely CS acceptance in Southeast Nigeria, concentrated chiefly at the point of family decision-making. Interventions to reduce emergency, as opposed to planned, CS in this setting should engage husbands and family decision-makers directly, rather than treating the pregnant woman as the sole locus of the decision.

Keywords

: caesarean section, stigma, family decision-making, Nigeria, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Downloads

References

1. Awoyinka, B. S., Ayinde, O. A., & Omigbodun, A. O. (2006). Acceptability of caesarean delivery to antenatal patients in southwest Nigeria. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 26(3), 208–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aziken, M., Omoaghoja, L., & Okonofua, F. (2007). Perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women towards caesarean section in urban Nigeria. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86(1), 42–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bawadi, H., Al-Hamdan, Z., Shaqra, N. A., Gharaibeh, A., Rawashdeh, H., & Basha, A. (2025). An interpretative phenomenological study about maternal perceptions of cesarean birth. PLOS ONE, 20(2), Article e0318525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Betrán, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A. B., Souza, J. P., & Zhang, J. (2021). Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6, Article e005671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boerma, T., Ronsmans, C., Melesse, D. Y., Barros, A. J. D., Barros, F. C., Juan, L., Moller, A. B., Say, L., Hosseinpoor, A. R., Yi, M., Neto, D. R., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 392, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chigbu, C. O., & Iloabachie, G. C. (2007). The burden of caesarean section refusal in a developing country setting. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114, 1261–1265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Elom, N. A., Nwimo, I. O., Ilo, C. I., Ngwakwe, P. C., Ezugwu, U. A., Alegu, D. N., Ojide, R. N., & Okpata, O. O. (2023). Belief towards caesarean section: A community-based study of male partners in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. SAGE Open Medicine, 11, Article 20503121221147810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Essén, B., Binder, P., & Johnsdotter, S. (2011). An anthropological analysis of the perspectives of Somali women in the West and their obstetric care providers on caesarean birth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 32(1), 10–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Geidam, A. D., Audu, B. M., Kawuwa, B. M., & Obed, J. Y. (2009). Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine, 8, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gyaase, D., Enuameh, Y. A., Adjei, B. N., Gyaase, S., Nakua, E. K., & Kabanunye, M. M. (2023). Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section deliveries in the Kintampo Districts of Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23, Article 286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture: An exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kpanake, L., Mullet-Muñoz, C., Pissa, M., & Adjiwanou, V. (2024). Why are pregnant women in Togo reluctant to undergo caesarean section? A systematic inventory of motives. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 45, Article 2423628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2), 228–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Larkin, M., Shaw, R., & Flowers, P. (2019). Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 182–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria], & ICF. (2019). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018: Key indicators report. NPC and ICF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nizza, I. E., Farr, J., & Smith, J. A. (2021). Achieving excellence in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): Four markers of high quality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 369–386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Onoh, R. C., Eze, J. N., Ezeonu, P. O., Lawani, L. O., Iyoke, C. A., & Nkwo, P. O. (2015). A 10-year appraisal of caesarean delivery and the associated fetal and maternal outcomes at a teaching hospital in southeast Nigeria. International Journal of Women's Health, 7, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Onwuka, K. S. (2024). Hebrew women delivery and child delivery among Nigerian Christian women. Theology and Science, 23(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Osayande, I., Ogunyemi, O., Gwacham-Anisiobi, U., Olaniran, A., Yaya, S., & Banke-Thomas, A. (2023). Prevalence, indications, and complications of caesarean section in health facilities across Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Health, 20, Article 81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rodriguez, J., Moro, M. R., & Radjack, R. (2023). Migrant mothers' experiences of caesarean section: A transcultural qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1152810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ryding, E. L., Wijma, K., & Wijma, B. (1998). Experiences of emergency cesarean section: A phenomenological study of 53 women. Birth, 25(4), 246–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sunday-Adeoye, I., & Kalu, C. A. (2011). Pregnant Nigerian women's view of caesarean section. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 14(3), 276–279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994). Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Social Science & Medicine, 38(8), 1091–1110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Treacy, L., & Sagbakken, M. (2015). Exploration of perceptions and decision-making processes related to childbirth in rural Sierra Leone. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, Article 87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ugwu, E., Obioha, K., Okezie, O., & Ugwu, A. (2011). A five-year survey of caesarean delivery at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 1, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ugwu, N. U., & de Kok, B. (2015). Socio-cultural factors, gender roles and religious ideologies contributing to caesarean-section refusal in Nigeria. Reproductive Health, 12, Article 70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. World Health Organization. (2015). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, & UNDESA/Population Division. (2023). Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles