Assessing the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act 2022: Progress, Pitfalls, and the Path toward Effective Enforcement

Sexual harassment remains a serious and pervasive issue in Malaysia, with victims frequently encountering obstacles in seeking justice and redress. Despite the introduction of the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act 2022 (ASHA 2022), numerous implementation challenges and legal gaps continue to hinder its effectiveness. This paper critically examines the extent to which ASHA 2022 addresses the existing shortcomings within Malaysia’s legal framework on sexual harassment. Employing a doctrinal research methodology, the analysis draws from statutory provisions, case law, policy documents, and academic commentaries to assess both the substantive and procedural aspects of the law. The findings reveal that while ASHA 2022 introduces significant legal reforms such as the establishment of a tribunal to adjudicate sexual harassment claims, it only partially resolves the existing lacunae. Persistent weaknesses remain in enforcement mechanisms, public awareness, victim protection, and coordination among relevant agencies. The study concludes that ASHA 2022 represents a progressive legislative milestone but that meaningful reform requires effective implementation, procedural refinement, and stronger institutional support. Policy recommendations are proposed to enhance enforcement, improve legal literacy, and strengthen protection for victims to ensure accessible and equitable justice.

Sexual Harassment, Victim’s Protection, Anti-Sexual Harassment Act, Access to Justice

1. Abd Latib, L. B., Ismail, N. Z. B., & Ilias, M. B. (2021). The Socio-Demographic Factors and Unspeakable Impacts of Street Harassment towards Young Malaysian Women’s Mental Health. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(19), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i19/11744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agardh, A., Priebe, G., Emmelin, M., Palmieri, J., Andersson, U., & Östergren, P. O. (2022). Sexual Harassment among Employees and Students at a Large Swedish University: who are Exposed, To What, By Whom and Where – A Cross-Sectional Prevalence study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14502-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. All Women’s Action Society (AWAM). (2020). Online Sexual Harassment on the Rise During MCO. https://www.awam.org.my/2020/05/25/online-sexual-harassment-on-the-rise-during-mco/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carroll, C. P. (2022). Accessing Rights and Mitigating Revictimization: The Role of the Victim’s Legal Counsel in the Swedish Criminal Justice System. Violence Against Women, 28(1), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205381.569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chow, S. (2016). Sexual Abuse Victims Share Their Stories With R.AGE. http://rage.com.my/talking-taboo/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Farid, A., Chung, I., & Agha, S. (2021). A Study on Malaysian Public Attitudes and Perceptions towards Violence Against Women (VAW) A Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hamin, Z., Hussain, F., Abd Rani, A. R., Kamaruddin, S., & Wan Rosli, W. R. (2022). Recent Development in Sexual Harassment Law in Malaysia: Whither the Victim’s Protection? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i11/15225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hamin, Z., Kamaruddin, S., & Wan Rosli, W. R. (2023). When The Law Is Half-Baked: A Critique Of The New Anti-Sexual Harassment Law In Malaysia. Journal of Administrative Science, 20(2), 256–267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ismawi, I. A. I. (2018). Sex Education in Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798765107348.ch-013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kaur, S. (2012). The Necessity for a Sexual Harassment Act in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal, 17(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v17i2.39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mawe, I. (2018). What does the law say about #MeToo? http://www.nikk.no/wp-content/uploads/metoo_eng_updated.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ram, S. (2020). A Group of Under 18s Are Demanding To Make Sex Ed Compulsory In Public Schools In Malaysia. Says.Com. https://says.com/my/news/education-ministry-make-sex-education-compulsory-in-malaysia-petition-the-noeo-project [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Today, F. M. (2022). Sexual assault victims stay silent for fear of derision, says expert. Free Malaysia Today, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wegerstad, L. (2022). Theorising Sexual Harassment and Criminalisation in a Swedish Context. Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 9(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v9i2.3525 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yusof, T. A. (2021). 57pc Young Women Experience Sexual Harassment on the Streets : Survey. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2021/09/729225/57pc-young-women-experience-sexual-harassment-streets-survey [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.