Social Cognitive Theory’s Role in Shaping Digital Resiliency

Recent research reveals significant gaps in digital resiliency among junior high students, despite increasing digital skills. Many learners exhibit proficiency in digital tools but lack the emotional coping strategies necessary to navigate online challenges such as cyberbullying and technology overuse, leading to anxiety and academic difficulties. Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) offers a valuable framework for addressing these gaps by emphasizing self-efficacy, observational learning, and social support as crucial factors in promoting responsible digital citizenship. Empirical studies confirm that enhancing self-efficacy and peer modelling through SCT-based interventions improves students’ motivation, coping mechanisms, and digital citizenship outcomes. This article discusses the theoretical foundations of SCT, the nature of digital resiliency, current gaps in learners’ digital citizenship skills, and how SCT can guide effective educational practices and governance policies to create balanced, resilient digital learners.

Social Cognitive Theory, Digital Resiliency, Digital Citizenship, Junior High School Students

1. Alvarez Ramos, F. (2021). Digital Skills and Technology Dependency Among Filipino Junior High School Students. Philippine Journal of Educational Studies, 39(2), 52-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ansari, S., Asif, S., & Khan, M. (2025). Association of stress and resilience in college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 219, 114994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balanga, U. R. D., & Cabuquin, J. C. (2024). Resilience in the Face of Adversity: Exploring Junior High Learners’ Perspectives and Experiences of Blended Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 5(1), e02402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, C.-C., & Tu, H.-Y. (2021). The Effect of Digital Game-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Performance Under Social Cognitive Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 750711. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, W., Li, Q., Yeo, G. (2020). Self-efficacy and digital citizenship in secondary education. Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Destination Knowledge. (2025). 10 Mental Health Trends Affecting K-12 Schools in 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eastern Visayas State University. (2025). The information technology resilience of bachelor's in elementary education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 121-132.Eastern Visayas State University. (2025). The information technology resilience of bachelor's in elementary education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 121-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Egele, S. S., & Stark, J. P. (2024). The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations in the Relationship Between Peer Context and Academic Engagement: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective. Children (Basel), 11(5), 629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. El Ouaddane, F., Benghabrit, O., & Chemsi, O. (2025). The Impact of Digital Skills on University Students' Motivation: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, J., & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. (2025). Fostering students’ motivation and self-efficacy in science, technology, engineering, and design through design thinking and making in project-based learning: a gender-perspective study in primary education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Frontiers in Psychiatry. (2022). Digital Resilience Among Individuals in School Education Settings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gannon, M. (2019). The Impact of Youths' Digital Citizenship Levels on Their Self-Efficacy. University of Central Florida. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kay, R., & Lauricella, S. (2019). Digital wellness in schools: Implications for educational policy and practice. Computers & Education, 135, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kim, Y. M., & Frick, T. W. (2023). Digital self-efficacy and digital citizenship: The relationship and the implications for education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kim, Y., & Choi, A. (2018). Developing a Youth Digital Citizenship Scale: A S.A.F.E. Model Approach. Journal of Digital Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Laakkonen, S., Suomi, A., & Kettunen, P. (2023). Systematic review of digital interventions to support refusal self-efficacy in child and adolescent health promotion. Health & Social Care in the Community, 31(6), e2866–e2878. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lee, K., & Wu, C. (2024). The role of self-efficacy, motivation, and perceived support of students' basic psychological needs in academic achievement. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1385442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lin, H., Chen, H., Liu, Q., Xu, J., & Li, S. (2024). A meta-analysis of the relationship between social support and physical activity in adolescents: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1305425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1305425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., et al. (2018). Observational learning and digital citizenship. European Journal of Education, 53, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sun, H., Yuan, C., Qian, Q., He, S., & Luo, Q. (2022). Digital resilience among individuals in school education settings: A concept analysis based on a scoping review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 858515. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.858515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Webster, J. (2025). Defining Digital Citizenship and Digital Citizenship Education. Journal of Educational Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zechner, M., & Gill, E. L. (2023). How Valid Is Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Physical Activity Behavior? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study