Can They Spot the Fake? AI Literacy and Synthetic Media Detection among Zimbabwean University Students
Authors
Senior Lecturer, National University of Science and Technology (Zimbabwe)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0603
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 8184-8197
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-16
Accepted: 2026-09-21
Published: 2026-10-01
Abstract
This study examined the extent to which AI literacy predicts Zimbabwean university students’ ability to detect synthetic media. A cross-sectional survey of 518 students at the National University of Science and Technology combined a self-report AI literacy scale adapted from Ng, Leung, Chu and Qiao (2021) with an objective six-item detection task. The central finding is a structural mismatch between confidence and competence. Students rated their literacy at moderate to high levels (overall M = 3.58 out of 5.00), yet correctly classified only 60.3% of stimuli, with accuracy on AI-generated items barely above chance. Multiple regression showed that critical literacy was the strongest predictor of detection accuracy (beta = 0.33, p < 0.001), while the frequency of AI tool use predicted nothing once evaluative skill was controlled for. The most consequential structural finding concerns learning channels. Social media taught detection skills to 62.0% of students, whereas formal education reached only 15.1%, meaning an unregulated informal ecology is doing the work universities have not taken up. The findings support critiques that self-report AI literacy frameworks overstate practical preparedness and indicate that detection is a trainable evaluative competency that should be embedded in curricula across disciplines rather than treated as a by-product of digital exposure.
Keywords
AI literacy, synthetic media, deepfakes, detection accuracy, Zimbabwe
Downloads
References
1. Biagini, G. (2024). Assessing the assessments: Toward a multidimensional approach to AI literacy. Media Education, 15(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.36253/me-15831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chesney, B. and Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753-1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Zimbabwe. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-zimbabwe [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Groh, M., Epstein, Z., Firestone, C. and Pierson, E. (2022). Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), e2110013119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110013119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M. and Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/jzz022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Köbis, N. and Mossink, L. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kruger, J. and Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J. and Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mare, A. (2020). State-ordered Internet shutdowns and digital authoritarianism in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Communication, 14, 4244-4263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mare, A., Mabweazara, H. M. and Moyo, D. (2019). “Fake news” and cyber-propaganda in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recentering the research agenda. African Journalism Studies, 40(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2020.1788295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Masunda, O. (2024). Peace Education 4.0: A Curriculum Framework for Africa. Academia Lasalliana Journal of Education and Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.55902/SJCE7127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Metzger, M. J. and Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Moyo, D. (2009). Citizen journalism and the parallel market of information in Zimbabwe’s 2008 election. Journalism Studies, 10(4), 551-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700902797291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W. and Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Pennycook, G. and Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Vaccari, C. and Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media and Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Wasserman, H. and Madrid-Morales, D. (2019). An exploratory study of “fake news” and media trust in Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. African Journalism Studies, 40(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2019.1627230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar