The Influence of Strategic Culture on the Malaysian Armed Forces’ Aspiration for Self-Reliant Capability Development

The strategic culture in Malaysia as a product of its sea-based geography, colonial and post-colonial experiences, and multi-national identity translates into a defence strategy that emphasises sovereignty, maritime security, and nuanced diplomacy. Experiences like the British military pullout and self-reliant measures within the country have strengthened the preference for multilateral engagement and risk-avertive, consensus-building policies aimed at minimising confrontation and protecting sea lines of communication. This is an issue to which a policy answer is sought: the policy of self-reliance in defence focuses on the production, maintenance and upgrading of military equipment, including selective foreign procurement, along with technology transfer and local sustainment and institutional capacity development. Capacity development focuses on dual-use industries, human capacity and doctrinal flexibility to apply new technologies and maintain operational autonomy. However, continuing difficulties have arisen, such as difficulties in achieving economies of scale, technological constraints, political-economic patronage that can negatively impact procurement processes, and disruptions in funding or policy guidance that can negatively affect the long-term maturation of industry. There are opportunities in legislative frameworks for putting local investment conditions upon foreign contracts, specialisation in niche products, research & development (R&D) in dual-use products, and enhancing methodological and institutional capabilities to ensure industry meets doctrinal needs. The relationship between strategic culture and self-reliance results in unique progress where strategic ends (autonomy, cohesion, maritime defence) are given by cultural imperatives and strategic means (industrial and managerial instruments) are used to build sustainable capabilities. To transform imports and partnerships into long-lasting domestic competence, which allows for an adaptive pathway of building capabilities that preserves national sovereignty, there is a need to overcome existing structural constraints and policy biases.

Keywords: Strategic Culture; Defence Self-Reliance; Capability Development; Defence Industrial Development; Malaysian Armed Forces

: Strategic Culture; Defence Self-Reliance; Capability Development; Defence Industrial Development; Malaysian Armed Forces

1. Asmanur, O., Saudi, N. S. M., Baker, R., & Saudi, M. H. M. (2025). From security to sustainability: Human capital development and the economic future of Malaysia’s defence industry. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 10(42), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.1042005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azmi, F. R., Sukri, N. M., Mahmud, N., Sundram, V. P. K., Hasbullah, N. N., & Musa, H. (2025). Resilient Supply Chains in Malaysia’s Manufacturing Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Priority Industries Affected by COVID-19. Paper Asia, 41(4), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v41i4b.557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bahari, M. Z., Abdul Batau, M. F., Pakeer Mohamed, A. S., Md Ladin, M. R., & Sulaiman, S. H. H. (2025). Achieving the defence self-reliance principle: Challenges and strategies for the defence industry in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(4), e003379. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i4.3379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balakrishnan, K., Badia, K., & Subramaniam, A. (2024). Strengthening Human Capability Through Defence Offset and Industrial Collaboration Resources. Defence S and T Technical Bulletin, 17(2), 217–235. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0 105021117987&partnerID=40&md5=2892b325bb801f93b6de42e435b7800c [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Balakrishnan, K., & Johar, T. N. (2023). The Role of Stakeholders in Managing Government Research and Development Funding for Defence Industrial Innovation: The Case of Malaysia. Defence and Peace Economics, 34(8), 1110–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2100588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bitzinger, R. A. (2015). Defence industries in Asia and the technonationalist impulse. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(3), 453-472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bitzinger, R. A., & Raska, M. (2023). The AI wave in defence innovation: Assessing military artificial intelligence strategies, capabilities, and trajectories. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International. Health Promotion International, 39(3), daae049. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2025). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: A values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(2), 399-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2382244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. CNA. (2026, January 23). ‘Kamikaze drones’, laser systems: Malaysia to boost defence industry amid ‘uncertain security realities’. The new National Defence Industry Policy aims to reduce Malaysia’s reliance on foreign security and defence technology and bolster long-term domestic industrial capacity. Channel NewsAsia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/kamikaze-drones-malaysia-boost-defence-industry-5878591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dwivedi, G. G. (2025). India’s quest for self-reliance in defence sector: Reality check, challenges and way ahead. Journal of Defence Studies, 19(3), 54–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fiott, D. (2024). Defence industrial readiness in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. European Union Institute for Security Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kania, E. B. (2024). Defence innovation ecosystems and military modernisation. Journal of Strategic Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kassim, Z., Suhaimi, Z. S., Subramaniam, S. A., Zahari, H. M., & Yahaya, M. N. (2024). Military spending and spillover effect on social welfare. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i2.1990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Koroshchupov, V. O. (2022). Some Aspects of European Defence Industry Development. World Economy and International Relations, 66(12), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-12-98-107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Malarvizhi, C. N. A., Manzoor, S. R., & Jayashree, S. (2021). Malaysia–Japan Defence Industry Collaboration Prospects: Rejuvenation of the Look East Policy (LEP). In Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics (Vol. 18, pp. 121–131). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71869-5_8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mbithi, E. W., Munyi, D. E., & Onyango, D. R. (2024). Influence of strategic culture on national security: The Kenya experience from 1963 to 2023. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(3). http://www.ijfmr.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mejino-Lpez, J., & Wolff, G. B. (2026). Europe’s dependence on U.S. foreign military sales: evidence for policymakers from a new database. Defence and Peace Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2026.2647243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mfodwo, E., Lanka, P., Aydogan, A. F., & Varol, C. (2026). Uncovering the Security Landscape of Maritime Software-Defined Radios: A Threat Modelling Perspective. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Min, I. J. (2026). Building indigenous defence industries in technologically third-tier countries: The cases of South Korea, Israel and Poland. University of St Andrews. https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ministry of Defence Malaysia. (2019). Defence white paper (DWP). MINDEF, Malaysia. Defence White Paper [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ministry of Defence Malaysia. (2026). National defence industry policy (NDIP). MINDEF, Malaysia. National Defence Industry Policy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mohamed, A. S. P., Batau, M. F. A., Ismail, S. E., & Ismail, M. F. (2024). Importance and significance of the self-reliance principle on the development of the Malaysian defence industry. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI22). https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5891 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Naguib, R. M. K. A. R. M., & Yusof, D. M. (2025). Malaysia’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy: A Top-Down Policy Analysis of Legislative, Rehabilitative, and Educational Approaches. Intellectual Discourse, 33, 229–253. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85217061089&partnerID=40&md5=a77204507bac575154ba1c0a59529280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Permal, S., & Moorthy, R. (2024). Nuancing maritime security governance in the Straits of Malacca: A comparative analysis of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategic Studies, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/jebat.2024.5103.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Radakrishnan, K. D. (2025). Malaysia’s defence industrial base journey builds self-reliance, enhances readiness. Indo-Pacific Defence Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Saravanamuttu, J., Mark, E., & Rayar, N. S. (2023). Malaysia’s National Role Conceptions and Transitions of Foreign Policy From Tunku To Mahathir. Kajian Malaysia, 41(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2023.41.1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Savitri, C. M. (2023). Go East or North? Recalibrating Defence Modernisation in a Post-Russia Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 45(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs45-2b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Setiawan, A., & Padilla, A. M. (2025). Addressing maritime security threats in the Malacca Strait: A Malaysian perspective. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.132021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhao, X. (2025). Navigating the U.S.–China Rivalry: ASEAN’s Position on Critical Mineral Resources. Pacific Focus, 40(3), 452–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.70006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zhou, H. (2023). State Capacity and Leadership: Why Did China Take Off? Chinese Economy, 56(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2022.2058183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]