A Scoping Review of Systemic Assessment for Clients Presenting in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injuries: Integrating Biopsychosocial and Family Systems Perspectives
Authors
Pan Africa Christian University (Kenya)
Pan Africa Christian University (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900136
Subject Category: psycology
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 1890-1908
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-10
Accepted: 2026-10-15
Published: 2026-10-03
Abstract
The complexity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires coordination across professional disciplines and across stages of recovery. Further, the multidimensional consequences of TBI demand an appraisal method that extends beyond neurological and physical impairment. In spite of the recognition that TBI affects interconnected biological, psychological, social, functional and family domains, it remains unclear how these domains are brought together during assessment. This scoping review maps and synthesises the existing evidence on assessment across biological, cognitive, psychological, social, functional, family, caregiver and relational domains; establishes the extent of family and inter-disciplinary involvement; and determines integration gaps. The review was conducted within the context of adult TBI care and rehabilitation. A total of 26 publications were included in the study. The inclusion criteria was articles based on primary research and published between January 2000 to September 2026 involving adults with TBI, The studies selected were published in English language. The search strategy involved a systematic, comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Europe PubMed Central, and Director of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Thematic analysis was then utilized to identify common categories and patterns across the extracted information, undertaking narrative content analysis to categorize the information. The results reveal a strong convergence toward viewing TBI as a condition with consequences extending beyond the injured individual to the family and wider social environment. A second point of convergence relates to the nexus between functional, social, psychological, and family outcomes. However, few studies provided evidence relevant to integrated or systemic assessment, particularly by demonstrating relationships among patient functioning, caregiver/family psychosocial characteristics, family functioning, community participation, and rehabilitation outcomes. The most salient gap identified in the present review is the fragmentation of assessment across individual, family, and social domains. The key integration gap for future research is the absence of a fully integrated biopsychosocial-family systems model. A coneptual integration of systemic TBI assesment is proposed
Keywords
Integration, Family Systems, Traumatic Brain Injury
Downloads
References
1. Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, pp. 19–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Broodryk, M., & Pretorius, C. (2015). Initial experiences of family caregivers of survivors of a traumatic brain injury. African Journal of Disability, 4(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bugri, M. K., & Ti-enkawol Nachinab, G. (2025). Experiences of family caregivers of patients with traumatic brain injury: a study in the Tamale metropolis. BMC Research Notes, 18(1), 417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L., & Taylor, G. (2011). Developing a framework for critiquing health research: an early evaluation. Nurse education today, 31(8), e1-e7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chan, V., Toccalino, D., Omar, S., Shah, R., & Colantonio, A. (2022). Integrated care for traumatic brain injury, mental health, and substance use: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 103(12), e212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chen, H. J., Ma, C. Y., Lin, L. F., Chang, C. C., Hueng, D. Y., Chang, Y. C., & Chiang, H. H. (2025). Can symptom-severity phenotypes identify depression risk after mild traumatic brain injury? A cluster-based approach. BMC psychiatry, 25(1), 1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Del Giovane, M., Trender, W. R., Bălăeţ, M., Mallas, E. J., Jolly, A. E., Bourke, N. J., ... & Hampshire, A. (2023). Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales. EClinicalMedicine, 59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dikmen, S., Machamer, J., Miller, B., Doctor, J., & Temkin, N. (2001). Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 18(2), 127-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dillahunt-Aspillaga, C., Jorgensen-Smith, T., Ehlke, S., Sosinski, M., Monroe, D., & Thor, J. (2013). Traumatic brain injury: unmet support needs of caregivers and families in Florida. PloS one, 8(12), e82896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Eady, K., Moreau, K. A., Marshall, S., & Egan, M. (2024). Patient, family, and health professional perspectives of how families are involved in adult inpatient traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Patient Experience Journal, 11(3), 29-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Faghihi, A., Zanjani, Z., Omidi, A., & Fakharian, E. (2022). A comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy received by patients with major depressive disorder following traumatic brain injury for emotional status and quality of life of their caregivers: a randomized controlled trial. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior, 5(1), 24-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ginsburg, J., & Smith, T. (2025, February 17). Traumatic brain injury. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557861/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hanks, R. A., Rapport, L. J., & Vangel, S. (2007). Caregiving appraisal after traumatic brain injury: The effects of functional status, coping style, social support and family functioning. NeuroRehabilitation, 22(1), 43-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hayes, K., Harding, S., Buckley, K., Blackwood, B., & Latour, J. M. (2023). Exploring the experiences of family members when a patient is admitted to the ICU with a severe traumatic brain injury: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(13), 4197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Johnson, L. W., & Hall, K. D. (2022). A scoping review of cognitive assessment in adults with acute traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(2), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kreutzer, J. S., Marwitz, J. H., Klyce, D. W., Schaaf, K. P. W., Sima, A. P., Welch, A. M., & Niemeier, J. P. (2018). Family needs on an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit: a quantitative assessment. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 33(4), 228-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Lindlöf, J., Turunen, H., Välimäki, T., Huhtakangas, J., Verhaeghe, S., & Coco, K. (2023). Empowering support for family members of brain injury patients in the acute phase of hospital care: A systematic review. Journal of Family Nursing, 30(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407231171933 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Liu, W., Zhu, J., Liu, J., & Guo, Q. (2015). Psychological state and needs of family member caregivers for victims of traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional descriptive study. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(3), 231-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Macauley, B. L. (2024). Interprofessional practice in the schools for students with traumatic brain injury. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-24-00022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mamman, R., Grewal, J., Garrone, J. N., & Schmidt, J. (2024). Biopsychosocial factors of quality of life in individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A scoping review. Quality of Life Research, 33(4), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03511-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Marino, A. N., Mui, M., Dobryakova, E., & Sandry, J. (2025). Classification systems for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: Review and recommendations. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-025-00504-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mathew, S. K., Aruna, S., Vasudevan, R. C., Visweswaran, V., Arjunan, P., Panachingal, B., & Jyothi, M. (2024). Integrating family involvement in neuro-intensive care: A pathway to enhanced family satisfaction in traumatic brain injury (TBI) management. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Matney, C., Bowman, K., & Berwick, D. (2022, February 1). Understanding patients with traumatic brain injury. Traumatic Brain Injury. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580077/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mbakile-Mahlanza, L., Manderson, L., Downing, M., & Ponsford, J. (2017). Family caregiving of individuals with traumatic brain injury in Botswana. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(6), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1152605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mortezaei, A., Safari, N., Gholamshahi, H., Kazemzadeh, K., & Tafakhori, A. (2025). Veterans traumatic brain injuries and neurosurgical challenges: A narrative review. Health Science Reports, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Muliira, J. K., Lazarus, E. R., Jacob, D., & Roslin, H. (2024). The needs of families caring for patients with traumatic brain injury: A scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 46(20), 4586–4594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2278178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C. McArthur, A. & Aromataris, A. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology. 18(143). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Nabors, N., Seacat, J., & Rosenthal, M. (2002). Predictors of caregiver burden following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16(12), 1039-1050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Nwosu, C., Spears, C. A., Pate, C., Gold, D. T., Bennett, G., Haglund, M., & Fuller, A. (2020). Influence of caretakers’ health literacy on delays to traumatic brain injury care in Uganda. Annals of global health, 86(1), 127-127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pacheco, B. M., Whitham, A., & Cahill, J. F. (2025). Traumatic brain injury – A neurologist’s approach. Medical Journal. http://www.rimed.org/rimedicaljournal/2025/08/2025-08-08-tbi-pacheco.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Page, T. A., Gordon, S., Balchin, R., & Tomlinson, M. (2021). Caregivers' perspectives of the challenges faced with survivors of traumatic brain injury: A scoping review. NeuroRehabilitation, 49(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-210099. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Perlesz, A., Kinsella, G., & Crowe, S. (2000). Psychological distress and family satisfaction following traumatic brain injury: Injured individuals and their primary, secondary, and tertiary carers. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(3), 909-929. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Peters, M.D.J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A.C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M. & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping Reviews. Ann Intern Med, 18(10), 2119 -2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Rasmussen, M. S., Andelic, N., Nordenmark, T. H., Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., & Soberg, H. L. (2019). The family as a resource for improving patient and family functioning after traumatic brain injury: A descriptive nonrandomized feasibility study of a family-centered intervention. Cogent Medicine, 6(1), 1607433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000072.pub3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Rotondi, A. J., Sinkule, J., Balzer, K., Harris, J., & Moldovan, R. (2007). A qualitative needs assessment of persons who have experienced traumatic brain injury and their primary family caregivers. Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 22(1), 14-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Sady, M. D., Sander, A. M., Clark, A. N., Sherer, M., Nakase-Richardson, R., & Malec, J. F. (2010). Relationship of preinjury caregiver and family functioning to community integration in adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 91(10), 1542-1550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Shelley-Tremblay, J. F., & Lawton, T. (2025). Interprofessional approaches to the treatment of mild traumatic brain injury: A literature review and conceptual framework informed by 94 professional interviews. Medical Sciences, 13(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Simpson, G., Hyzak, K. A., Hawley, L., Vunkhanching, M., & Mantell, A. (2023). Psychosocial assessment in brain injury: An international social work survey. Brain Injury, 37(6), 517-524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Singh, M., Firman-Sadler, L., Guarnera, J., Simpson-Kent, I. L., Imms, P., Irimia, A., ... & TRACK-TBI Investigators. (2026). Bridging mental health, cognition and the brain in mild traumatic brain injury: A multilayer network analysis of the TRACK-TBI study. NeuroImage: Clinical, 103957. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Tate, R. L., Godbee, K., & Sigmundsdottir, L. (2013). A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(4), 729-750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Theadom, A., Rowland, V., Levack, W., Starkey, N., Wilkinson-Meyers, L., McPherson, K., & TBI Experiences Group. (2016). Exploring the experience of sleep and fatigue in male and female adults over the 2 years following traumatic brain injury: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ open, 6(4), e010453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O`Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E.A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A.,Wilson, M.G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., Godfrey, C. M., Macdonald, M.T., Langlois, E.V., Soares-Weiser, K., Moriarty, J., Clifford, T., Tuncalp, Ö. & Straus. S.E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med, 2, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Tsen, J., Finn, J. A., Klocksieben, F. A., O’Neil-Pirozzi, T. M., Sander, A. M., Agtarap, S. D., ... & Nakase-Richardson, R. (2025). Long-Term Family Needs After a Traumatic Brain Injury: A VA TBI Model Systems Study. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 40(4), 258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Vangel Jr, S. J., Rapport, L. J., & Hanks, R. A. (2011). Effects of family and caregiver psychosocial functioning on outcomes in persons with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 26(1), 20-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Von Steinbüchel, N., Real, R. G., Sasse, N., Wilson, L., Otto, C., Mullins, R., ... & Gibbons, H. (2017). German validation of Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) assessment and associated factors. PLoS One, 12(5), e0176668. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Walsh, F. (2021). Family resilience. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 255–270). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.003.0015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Watanabe, T., Suzuki, M., Yamada, K., Aizu, N., & Ota, K. (2025). The relationship between social participation and quality of life in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Fujita Medical Journal, 11(3), 111-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Whiffin, C. J., Gracey, F., & Ellis-Hill, C. (2021). The experience of families following traumatic brain injury in adult populations: A meta-synthesis of narrative structures. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 123, 104043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Winstanley, J., Simpson, G., Tate, R., & Myles, B. (2006). Early indicators and contributors to psychological distress in relatives during rehabilitation following severe traumatic brain injury: Findings from the brain injury outcomes study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 21(6), 453-466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Healing the soul of the World: Towards Co-Evolutionary Psychotherapy in the Ecological Collapse Era
- Sa Likod ng Screen: Mental Health Challenges and Coping Strategies of Content Moderators in Cebu City
- Inside the Gambler's Mind: Experiences of Punters in Harare CBD
- The Influence of Organic Interior Geometry on Psychological Comfort and Spatial Experience