Environmental Cost Disclosure and Quality Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Agricultural Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya

Authors

Musina Ochieng Bonface

Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, School of Business and Economics, Kibabii University (Kenya)

Arnety Nangila

Department of Finance, Accounting and Economics, Alupe University (Kenya)

Rashid Simuyu Fwamba

Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, School of Business and Economics, Kibabii University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900162

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 2294-2305

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-13

Accepted: 2026-07-18

Published: 2026-10-05

Abstract

Sustainability reporting quality among agricultural firms listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) remains inconsistent. This persists despite growing stakeholder expectations for verifiable environmental accountability. Environmental costs, including pollution control, waste management, and remediation expenditure, are often disclosed voluntarily and without a standard classification framework. This study examined the influence of environmental cost disclosure (ECD) on quality sustainability reporting (QSR) among listed agricultural firms in Kenya. It also assessed whether environmental management accounting (EMA) conditions this relationship. The study used an explanatory research design and a ten-year panel covering 2015-2024. All seven NSE-listed agricultural firms were included through a census, giving a maximum of 70 firm-year observations. ECD was measured as total environmental costs divided by total revenue. QSR was measured using a validated eleven-dimension index. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and pooled panel ordinary least squares models were applied. ECD had a positive but statistically non-significant direct association with QSR in the direct-effects model. In the full interaction model, the ECD by EMA term was positive and marginally significant at the 10% level. These results suggest that internal environmental accounting capacity may strengthen the association between cost disclosure and reporting quality. The estimates should be interpreted cautiously because the effective regression sample was 48 firm-year observations and the models showed positive serial correlation. The study recommends clearer environmental cost classification guidance, stronger EMA systems, and further research using larger panels and robust panel estimators.

Keywords

Environmental Cost Disclosure, Environmental Management Accounting, Quality Sustainability Reporting, Agricultural Firms, Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya

Downloads

References

1. Abdullahi, M., & Abubakar, A. (2023). Sustainability reporting and corporate governance in emerging markets: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of African Business, 24(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2022.2054321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adams, C., Almeida, S., & Ferreira, A. (2005). Environmental management accounting: Principles and practice for business and environmental accountability. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Christopoulos, D. K., & Tsionas, E. G. (2004). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 55-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ferreira, A., Moulang, C., & Hendro, B. (2010). Environmental management accounting and innovation: An exploratory analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 920-948. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Habek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2016). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S1 general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information and IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. International Sustainability Standards Board. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kamila, N., & Wulandari, D. (2024). Environmental cost, performance and carbon emission disclosure on financial performance in Indonesian mining firms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Business, 21(4), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khalid, K. (2006). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited. Journal of Applied Economics, 12(2), 34-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2021). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Manini, M. (2023). NSE ESG reporting review: A survey of listed companies. Nairobi Securities Exchange Research Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mion, G., & Adaui, C. R. L. (2020). Mandatory non-financial disclosure and its consequences on the sustainability reporting quality of Italian and German companies. Sustainability, 12(12), 4832. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nwaiwu, G., & Oluka, N. (2018). Environmental cost disclosure and financial performance measures of quoted oil and gas companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 4(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Otieno, C., & Wanjare, J. (2024). Environmental accounting and sustainable business in Turkana County, Kenya. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 13(2), 148-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pfeffer, J., & Dowling, J. B. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Greenleaf Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Schneider, T., Michelon, G., & Paananen, M. (2017). Environmental and social disclosure in mandatory reporting: Evidence from the EU non-financial reporting directive. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(2), 187-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Shiett, L. O., & Eshiet, D. O. (2024). Environmental information disclosure and market value of listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 10(1), 61-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vogt, W. P., & Johnson, R. B. (2011). Dictionary of statistics and methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles