Leadership Strategies and Food Safety Control Performance: Evidence from a Malaysian Public Regulatory Agency
Authors
Food Safety and Quality Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900182
Subject Category: Food safety
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 2549-2559
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-16
Accepted: 2026-09-21
Published: 2026-10-05
Abstract
Food safety remains a major public health and economic concern, requiring regulatory authorities to maintain effective and consistent food safety control throughout the supply chain. Although Malaysia has established comprehensive food safety legislation and regulatory systems, variations in enforcement performance indicate that organizational factors may influence regulatory effectiveness. This study examined the association between leadership strategies and perceived food safety control performance within the Food Safety and Quality Division (FSQD), Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH). A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 211 permanent Food Technology Officers. Leadership strategies were measured using five dimensions: idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, and empowering leadership, while food safety control performance was assessed using officers’ perceptions of organizational performance. Data were analyzed using regression analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The PLS-SEM results demonstrated a significant positive relationship between leadership strategies and food safety control performance (β = 0.581, t = 9.00, p < .001; 95% CI [0.454, 0.707]). Supplementary regression analysis also showed a positive relationship (unstandardized b = 0.768, t = 21.094, p < .001), with leadership strategies accounting for 68.0% of the variance in perceived food safety control performance in the supplementary regression (R² = 0.680). These findings indicate a positive association between leadership strategies and officers’ assessments of organizational performance. Leadership development may be relevant to regulatory coordination and implementation of food safety policies. The study applies Transformational Leadership Theory in a public food safety regulatory setting and identifies leadership development as an area for further consideration.
Keywords
Leadership strategies; transformational leadership; food safety control performance
Downloads
References
1. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. (2023). Baldrige excellence framework (Leadership and management practices). National Institute of Standards and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2023). General principles of food hygiene (CXC 1-1969). FAO/WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. EFQM. (2020). The EFQM Model. European Foundation for Quality Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & World Health Organization. (2022). Food safety aspects of sustainable food systems. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Food Safety and Quality Division. (2024). Annual report 2024. Ministry of Health Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19(4), 299–319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ishak, N. A., Kamsani, N. A., & Salleh, M. M. (2019). Food hygiene knowledge and practices among food handlers in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 29(5), 567–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kamsani, N. A., Salleh, M. M., & Ishak, N. A. (2022). Compliance behaviour among food premises operators in Malaysia. Journal of Food Safety, 42(3), e12979. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ministry of Health Malaysia. (1983). Food Act 1983 (Act 281). Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ministry of Health Malaysia. (1985). Food Regulations 1985. Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ministry of Health Malaysia. (2009). Food Hygiene Regulations 2009. Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total quality management and operational excellence: Text with cases (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. OECD. (2017). Government at a Glance 2017. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. OECD. (2023). Government at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. United Nations. (2023). World Public Sector Report 2023. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Unnevehr, L. (2015). Food safety in developing countries: Moving beyond exports. Global Food Security, 4, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Van Wart, M. (2017). Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. World Health Organization. (2022). WHO global strategy for food safety 2022–2030: Towards stronger food safety systems and global cooperation. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Investigating Heavy Metals Contamination Level in Poultry Feed and Layer Chicken Eggs and Its Associated Health Risk in Bangladesh
- Green Innovation Strategies for Food Waste Reduction in Casual Dining Restaurants: Evidence from Naga City, Philippines
- Urban Food Security in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review of Challenges, Determinants, and Future Research Directions
- Levels of Awareness, Understanding, and Practices of Street Food Vendors on Food Safety in Ormoc City