Inclusive Growth and Organizational Resilience of Selected Organizations in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria

Authors

Oyor Godspower (Ph.D)

Department of Business Administration, Benson Idahosa University, Benin City, Edo State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0198

Subject Category: Human Resource Management

Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 2653-2663

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-23

Accepted: 2026-09-28

Published: 2026-10-15

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between organizationally inclusive growth and organizational resilience among selected organizations in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria, using Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) as the guiding framework. In this study, inclusive growth is conceptually translated to the organizational level as practices that broaden employees’ access to meaningful participation and human-capital development, thereby expanding the capability base available for value creation and adaptation. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. The target population comprised 5,005 employees of Benson Idahosa University, Zenith Bank and the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. A minimum sample size of 370 was obtained using Yamane’s (1967) formula and increased by 20% to 444 to accommodate possible non-response and unusable questionnaires. Of the 444 questionnaires administered, 427 were returned and 421 were valid and usable. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression. The results showed that inclusive participation significantly and positively predicted organizational resilience (β = 0.301, t = 6.085, p < 0.001), while inclusive human capital development also significantly and positively predicted organizational resilience (β = 0.405, t = 8.244, p < 0.001). Together, the two predictors explained 38.9% of the variance in organizational resilience (R² = 0.389, adjusted R² = 0.386, F = 133.02, p < 0.001). Inclusive human capital development had the stronger standardized coefficient, suggesting that broad-based learning, reskilling and capability development may be particularly important for organizational adaptability in the sampled organizations. The findings support the argument that inclusion can function as a strategic capability rather than solely as an ethical or employee-relations concern. The study contributes to the resilience literature by linking distributed employee participation and broad-based capability development to the sensing, seizing and reconfiguring processes emphasized by DCT.

Keywords

Inclusive Growth, Inclusive Participation, Inclusive Human Capital Development, Organizational Resilience, Emerging Markets.

Downloads

References

1. Conz, E., & Magnani, G. (2020). A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13, 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). OECD skills outlook 2021: Learning for life. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0ae365b4-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Roberson, Q. (2020). Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shepherd, D. A., & Williams, T. A. (2022). Different response paths to organizational resilience. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 299–329. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2021). Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 733–769. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. World Bank. (2020). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles